Show Tags

13 Jan 2013, 22:16
Would go with the client on this one (as with a lot of other things).

too much money to be turned down and yes, as far as I've read, the scholarship/fellowship definitely builds your case for recruitment.
Manager
Joined: 25 Oct 2012
Posts: 166
Concentration: Strategy, Organizational Behavior
Schools: London Business School (LBS) - Class of 2002
WE: Management Consulting (Consulting)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 57 [0], given: 2

Re: Tuck vs Darden ($$+chance at prestigious fellowship) [#permalink] Show Tags 13 Jan 2013, 22:54 Congratulations! As others have suggested, try visiting both schools if possible. If not, try to talk to as many current students at both schools to see where you fit in better and ask specific questsions about career opportunities. They are both really great institutions. You will get what you put into the business school experience, and I'm sure you will end up with a great job either way if you focus and work hard. So I would lean toward Darden w the full tuition, and wish you luck in getting the Jefferson Fellowship! Christine Lin If you like this post, please give it KUDOS! joy4ol wrote: If you are not already sick of such questions, please help me here with a dilemma. First the complete application season status: Wharton, Booth (ding w/ interview), Sloan (ding w/o interview) Tuck (Admit) Darden (Admit w/$$$+ chance to interview for Jefferson fellowship which would also cover living expenses +$3,000/yr stipend)
LBS, Haas (WLed)
Kellogg (Applied R2, no result out yet, of course)

I will admit Tuck was one of my first loves and till a few days back (before the Darden scholarship info) I didn't even consider not going to Tuck. But now I feel I am in a massive dilemma regarding the situation - Darden is really keen on having me and $110k+ over two years is nothing to sneeze at while Tuck refused my request for any $$. My background is: Indian/M/CFA/Engineer with 5+ years in third-party research services (mainly fixed income). I am a bit uncertain about the direction of my career. Off the bat, I would try to get an summer internship with GS/JPM/UBS etc. and try to get a full-time offer (FTO). I plan to meet the full cost of education through loans and a FTO would be really important to get over the sinking-in-debt feeling. Assuming the said FTO materializes, I would like to explore opportunities beyond ibanking in my second year such as with IFC, WB or just plain ol' corp. finance. Investment banking is a close plan B if these options do not play out well. I would ideally like to get back to India/HK/Singapore in 7-10 years post-MBA. Making lifelong friends and quality of life are very important considerations while at both during MBA and beyond that. Much more important than slight differences in salary. That being said, I am sensitive to career opportunities (does it open doors?) and quality of network (will people bat for me if I want to move into PE in Asia 3-4 years down the line?). So here is how my analysis breaks down to: Tuck + Ivy league, top-10, bigger brand (just my perception?) + Highly regarded alum network + Relatively strong connections to PE (and many students with prior IB/PE exp; I know I wouldn't get in but the network is important I suppose given my ambivalent career goals) - No ; a longer debt repayment period - Very cold winters (but then I dont mind the idea of skiing ) Darden + Top-15 (though not THAT below Tuck in US News rankings) + Full tuition + chance at Jefferson Fellowship (Full cost of attendance + up to 3000/yr stipend) (My client, who is in sell-side research, says if you are getting full ride and fellowship, the school will cater special attention to see you get placed and the fellowship will help me distinguish my resume better, any idea on the validity of that opinion?) - Top-15 is lower than top-10 - I somehow like the sound of Boston/NY better than GA (note that I have never been to the states) #Not sure about either school's standing with IFC et al. Would I be really foolish to give up on greater long-term benefits with Tuck for short-term benefits? Or is Darden here a "no-brainer" (as my client says)? _________________ Christine Lin | Marvel Admissions Marvel Admissions Website | Marvel Admissions Blog Senior Manager Joined: 24 Mar 2010 Posts: 347 Followers: 7 Kudos [?]: 104 [0], given: 4 Re: Tuck vs Darden ($$$+chance at prestigious fellowship) [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 Jan 2013, 23:33

Show Tags

14 Jan 2013, 12:16
I wouldnt even think twice about this. I actually visited and interviewed at both schools. Both programs great and very simmilar (I like Tuck´s more) - both are small programs, have a strong alumni network, focused on general managent, rely heavily in the case method (moreso Darden). C-Ville is a million times nicer than Hanover. Tuck does place more stuednts in the north east but it can surely be done from Darden too.

I dont think there is a massive difference in brand name recognition between both schools abroad. At least in Latin American neither school is well known.

Even if you look inot rankings its a top 10 vs a top 15 school.

I think this is pretty straight forward, go to Darden.
Senior Manager
Joined: 24 Mar 2010
Posts: 347
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 104 [0], given: 4

Show Tags

14 Jan 2013, 13:54
Shawshank wrote:

Show Tags

14 Jan 2013, 18:01
joy4ol wrote:

jumsumtak wrote:
too much money to be turned down and yes, as far as I've read, the scholarship/fellowship definitely builds your case for recruitment.

Thanks for input jumsumtak. Fellowship aside, what if its just a full ride? how do you include that in your resume? Does that still matter to recruiters?

A full ride should be on your resume as well.

merit-scholarship-for-mba-on-resume-117044.html
Senior Manager
Joined: 31 Oct 2011
Posts: 484
Schools: Johnson '16 (M)
GMAT 1: 690 Q45 V40
WE: Asset Management (Mutual Funds and Brokerage)
Followers: 38

Kudos [?]: 217 [0], given: 57

Show Tags

16 Jan 2013, 17:34
hamm0 wrote:
joy4ol wrote:
Maybe its an omen or something, I read this in the morning (http://news.efinancialcareers.com/uk-en/131760/how-banking-can-ruin-your-body-and-mind/) and was immediately reminded why I had second thoughts about ibanking in the first place. Still can't get "moobs" out of my head. And lets not even go near ED.

So if you would like to indulge me again, any idea which of these schools would allow me to better explore a career in international/developmental finance? Read IFC, WB etc. Is distance to NY/Washington a factor here?

For non-traditional paths like that.. I think your best bet is talking to current students/alumni. I have to imagine, though, that both schools will do equally as well in that forum.

Indeed. I am definitely gonna talk to their "emerging market clubs" again (which from my pre-mba research I have found to be mostly dysfunctional at most lower ranked schools; Sloan with its SEID was an exception, and Wharton and Booth are of course at the top of the game with their specialized Lauder/IMBA programs)
Senior Manager
Joined: 24 Mar 2010
Posts: 347
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 104 [0], given: 4

Show Tags

16 Jan 2013, 17:43
joy4ol wrote:
Shawshank wrote:
Given your career goals, Tuck is definitely better. Darden is fine for regular bulge bracket banking, but it's weak in other areas of finance; its bread and butter has always been consulting. Although Tuck is also a general management focused school, it's remarkably strong in finance, and its network is amazing despite the small size. If you're VERY confident that those are your career goals, go to Tuck.

Also, Tuck has formal joint degree programs with harvard kennedy and johns hopkins sais. Given your goals, you should look into applying to those schools during your first year at Tuck.

I have never seriously considered the JD/MBA thing but let me explore this as well. Extra costs as well I imagine :\

Harvard kennedy and johns hopkins are policy programs, NOT law schools. You would get a master's, NOT a JD.
Intern
Joined: 12 Jun 2010
Posts: 32
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 31