vishalsinghvs08 wrote:
how is population considered an uncountable noun?
I guess, the word "population" can be both a countable and uncountable noun, depending on the context.
When used as a countable noun, "population" refers to a specific group of people or animals within a particular area, such as "the population of New York City" or "the population of elephants in Africa."
When used as an uncountable noun, "population" generally refers to the entire group of people or animals in a particular area, without specifying a specific number or amount. For example, "the population of the world" or "the population of endangered species."
Here are some examples of using "population" as a countable noun and as an uncountable noun:
Countable noun:- The population of the town is 10,000 people.
- The populations of Canada, the United States, and Mexico are all over 100 million.
- The world population has grown by several billion people in the last century.
In these examples, "population" is countable because it refers to a specific number of people in a particular place or group. It can be pluralized, and you can use numbers to quantify it.
Uncountable noun:- The growth of population in the city is a major concern for urban planners.
- Overpopulation is a serious problem in many developing countries.
- The population of the world is expected to reach 9 billion by 2050.
In these examples, "population" is uncountable because it refers to a general concept, an abstract idea or a whole group that cannot be counted. You cannot pluralize it, and you cannot use a number to quantify it. Instead, you can use words like "growth," "density," or "size" to describe it.
In our case, you would use "as much as 15 percent of the population."
"Much" is used with uncountable nouns, and in this context, "population" refers to a single, unified group of people, so it should be treated as an uncountable noun.
Does this make sense?