Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 22:40 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 22:40

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 09 May 2012
Affiliations: UWC
Posts: 314
Own Kudos [?]: 8799 [62]
Given Kudos: 100
Location: Canada
GMAT 1: 620 Q42 V33
GMAT 2: 680 Q44 V38
GPA: 3.43
WE:Engineering (Entertainment and Sports)
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 4346
Own Kudos [?]: 30786 [19]
Given Kudos: 635
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Send PM
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Status: enjoying
Posts: 5265
Own Kudos [?]: 42103 [5]
Given Kudos: 422
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Send PM
General Discussion
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 05 Jun 2012
Status:Rising GMAT Star
Posts: 106
Own Kudos [?]: 270 [0]
Given Kudos: 16
Location: Philippines
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GPA: 3.22
WE:Corporate Finance (Consulting)
Send PM
Re: Citing increasing worker mobility between companies, poor financial [#permalink]
Ahh these are the types of questions that ask for the intended meaning of the author. With that I go with E. I love simple sentences and, generally, the simpler the sentence the better. I mean come to think of it, why prolong your sentences when you could cut them up into smaller pieces. :)
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2012
Posts: 77
Own Kudos [?]: 104 [0]
Given Kudos: 17
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GMAT Date: 07-23-2012
WE:Programming (Telecommunications)
Send PM
Re: Citing increasing worker mobility between companies, poor financial [#permalink]
Lengthy question but easy one. Got E.

Btw E is keeping the meaning intact as it is the study made by author himself.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 May 2011
Posts: 110
Own Kudos [?]: 152 [0]
Given Kudos: 7
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, International Business
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V38
GPA: 3.6
WE:Project Management (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: Citing increasing worker mobility between companies, poor financial [#permalink]
Why I am odd one out who thinks D is better than E?

E is not even covering all the aspects (one of them mentioned above by daagh) of the original sentence.

So my question is why D is so bad? is it because of placing of multiple commas OR it is because of placing of "Citing" and "Finding"?

Please enlighten me....
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 09 May 2012
Affiliations: UWC
Posts: 314
Own Kudos [?]: 8799 [0]
Given Kudos: 100
Location: Canada
GMAT 1: 620 Q42 V33
GMAT 2: 680 Q44 V38
GPA: 3.43
WE:Engineering (Entertainment and Sports)
Send PM
Re: Citing increasing worker mobility between companies, poor financial [#permalink]
Seems like a lot of you find this one easy; then please do explain why E is the best choice? That way we can have a more productive thread! :panel
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2012
Posts: 77
Own Kudos [?]: 104 [0]
Given Kudos: 17
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GMAT Date: 07-23-2012
WE:Programming (Telecommunications)
Send PM
Re: Citing increasing worker mobility between companies, poor financial [#permalink]
macjas wrote:
Seems like a lot of you find this one easy; then please do explain why E is the best choice? That way we can have a more productive thread! :panel



..., citing increasing worker mobility between companies, poor financial planning by workers, and finding that the plans themselves are excessively complex [as in D]

...increasing worker mobility between companies, poor financial planning on the workers' part, and excess complexity in the plans themselves. [As in E]

Clearly in D the three parts are not parallel but that is not the case with E.
This is one of the reason to avoid D.
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 05 Jun 2012
Posts: 12
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 3
Send PM
Re: Citing increasing worker mobility between companies, poor financial [#permalink]
A: I can't warrant the use of the past perfect
B: the study found the majority of Americans - the wrong meaning
C: again, past and present perfect
Now the difference between D and E is different subjects. "The authors of a study have found" vs "A recent study has found". I got this one wrong. I guess "the authors of a study" is redundant: we shouldn't care about the people behind the study, only results matter. Also, the semicolon makes the better structure of a sentence (but that's just my feeling)
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 27 Apr 2012
Posts: 55
Own Kudos [?]: 224 [0]
Given Kudos: 21
Location: United States
GMAT Date: 06-11-2013
GPA: 3.5
WE:Marketing (Consumer Products)
Send PM
Re: Citing increasing worker mobility between companies, poor financial [#permalink]
My 2 cents...

A is wrong because of this - "and finding that the plans themselves are excessively complex" : This part is not parallel to the
2 earlier portions of the list

and because the order of the sentence is awkward thereby it is a writing style error."The study" which is the main point of the sentence should logically be the subject and the list should be mentioned thereafter with all 3 points being parallel.

E - is concise,logically written and takes care of the above 2 points
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 09 May 2012
Affiliations: UWC
Posts: 314
Own Kudos [?]: 8799 [1]
Given Kudos: 100
Location: Canada
GMAT 1: 620 Q42 V33
GMAT 2: 680 Q44 V38
GPA: 3.43
WE:Engineering (Entertainment and Sports)
Send PM
Re: Citing increasing worker mobility between companies, poor financial [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Here is daagh's excellent explanation:

This is a complex question involving modification and meaning

A Citing increasing worker mobility between companies, poor financial planning by workers, and finding that the plans themselves are excessively complex, the authors of a recent study have found that most eligible American workers had not made the maximum allowed contribution to their employer-offered retirement plan ---Modification is ok. However, the use of past perfect had not made is erroneous. The setting is present tense. So present perfect have not made will be most ideal

B Increasing worker mobility between companies, poor financial planning on the part of workers, and excess complexity in the plans themselves have been explained by a recent study finding the majority of eligible American workers who do not make the maximum allowed contribution to their employer-offered retirement plans----Meaning change. The study cites and not explains

C Citing increasing worker mobility between companies, poor worker financial planning, and excessively complex plans themselves as possible explanations, a majority of American workers had failed to make the maximum allowed contribution to their employer-offered retirement plans, a recent study has found --- who are citing? Not the majority of the workers but the authors of the study; so misplaced modification. After explanations, the authors should come. Another problem is the majority of the workers. The original says the most eligible American workers. Drop it

D The authors of a recent study, citing increasing worker mobility between companies, poor financial planning by workers, and finding that the plans themselves are excessively complex, have found that most eligible American workers do not make the maximum allowed contribution to their employer-offered retirement plans.--- Modification is ok but the modifier phrase has serious problem. citing increasing worker mobility between companies, poor financial planning by workers is an adverbial modifier while finding ( a gerund here) that the plans themselves are excessively complex, is a noun phrase. They are not parallel.

E A recent study has found that most eligible American workers fail to make the maximum allowed contribution to their employer-offered retirement plans; among the explanations cited are increasing worker mobility between companies, poor financial planning on the workers' part, and excess complexity in the plans themselves. – E is perhaps an escape route from this complex topic. Finding it too hot to handle the topic in a single sentence, the authors have split it into two and somehow got out of it. Still I am not happy because, the choice does not even mention the authors.

I need to brush up on identifying noun forms of verbs!
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4452
Own Kudos [?]: 28571 [2]
Given Kudos: 130
Re: Citing increasing worker mobility between companies, poor financial [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
A good challenging SC.

Citing increasing worker mobility between companies, poor financial planning by workers, and finding that the plans themselves are excessively complex, the authors of a recent study have found that most eligible American workers had not made the maximum allowed contribution to their employer-offered retirement plans.

Notice, this has a failed parallel structure:
/Citing
//increasing worker mobility between companies
//poor financial planning by workers
and
/finding

That's a variant of parallelism that the GMAT does not accept. We don't simply have three element in parallel, but some bizarre 2 vs. 1 split. No good.

A) Citing increasing worker mobility between companies, poor financial planning by workers, and finding that the plans themselves are excessively complex, the authors of a recent study have found that most eligible American workers had not made the maximum allowed contribution to their employer-offered retirement plans.
Wrong for the failure in parallelism.

B) Increasing worker mobility between companies, poor financial planning on the part of workers, and excess complexity in the plans themselves have been explained by a recent study finding the majority of eligible American workers who do not make the maximum allowed contribution to their employer-offered retirement plans.
The awkward wordy passive construction "have been explained by a recent study finding" is anathema on GMAT SC.

C) Citing increasing worker mobility between companies, poor worker financial planning, and excessively complex plans themselves as possible explanations, a majority of American workers had failed to make the maximum allowed contribution to their employer-offered retirement plans, a recent study has found.
Misplaced modifier. "Citing blah blah ...., a majority of American workers ...." The American workers were not doing the citing. The American works are experiencing the problems, but the majority is not writing about the problem. It is the study, or the authors of the study, that did the citing --- they have to be the target of this modifier.

D)The authors of a recent study, citing increasing worker mobility between companies, poor financial planning by workers, and finding that the plans themselves are excessively complex, have found that most eligible American workers do not make the maximum allowed contribution to their employer-offered retirement plans.
This answer choice repeats the faulty parallelism construction of the prompt.

E) A recent study has found that most eligible American workers fail to make the maximum allowed contribution to their employer-offered retirement plans; among the explanations cited are increasing worker mobility between companies, poor financial planning on the workers' part, and excess complexity in the plans themselves.
Clear, direct, active, and the parallelism is handled correctly. This one is flawless.

Let me know if anyone reading this has any questions.

Mike :-)
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 07 May 2011
Posts: 15
Own Kudos [?]: 47 [0]
Given Kudos: 11
Send PM
Re: Citing increasing worker mobility between companies, poor financial [#permalink]
mikemcgarry wrote:
A good challenging SC.

Citing increasing worker mobility between companies, poor financial planning by workers, and finding that the plans themselves are excessively complex, the authors of a recent study have found that most eligible American workers had not made the maximum allowed contribution to their employer-offered retirement plans.

Notice, this has a failed parallel structure:
/Citing
//increasing worker mobility between companies
//poor financial planning by workers
and
/finding

That's a variant of parallelism that the GMAT does not accept. We don't simply have three element in parallel, but some bizarre 2 vs. 1 split. No good.

A) Citing increasing worker mobility between companies, poor financial planning by workers, and finding that the plans themselves are excessively complex, the authors of a recent study have found that most eligible American workers had not made the maximum allowed contribution to their employer-offered retirement plans.
Wrong for the failure in parallelism.

B) Increasing worker mobility between companies, poor financial planning on the part of workers, and excess complexity in the plans themselves have been explained by a recent study finding the majority of eligible American workers who do not make the maximum allowed contribution to their employer-offered retirement plans.
The awkward wordy passive construction "have been explained by a recent study finding" is anathema on GMAT SC.

C) Citing increasing worker mobility between companies, poor worker financial planning, and excessively complex plans themselves as possible explanations, a majority of American workers had failed to make the maximum allowed contribution to their employer-offered retirement plans, a recent study has found.
Misplaced modifier. "Citing blah blah ...., a majority of American workers ...." The American workers were not doing the citing. The American works are experiencing the problems, but the majority is not writing about the problem. It is the study, or the authors of the study, that did the citing --- they have to be the target of this modifier.

D)The authors of a recent study, citing increasing worker mobility between companies, poor financial planning by workers, and finding that the plans themselves are excessively complex, have found that most eligible American workers do not make the maximum allowed contribution to their employer-offered retirement plans.
This answer choice repeats the faulty parallelism construction of the prompt.

E) A recent study has found that most eligible American workers fail to make the maximum allowed contribution to their employer-offered retirement plans; among the explanations cited are increasing worker mobility between companies, poor financial planning on the workers' part, and excess complexity in the plans themselves.
Clear, direct, active, and the parallelism is handled correctly. This one is flawless.

Let me know if anyone reading this has any questions.

Mike :-)


E sounded and read flawless, indeed. Proper usage of ; and "workers' part" were especially of note.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 13 Sep 2012
Posts: 7
Own Kudos [?]: [0]
Given Kudos: 4
Send PM
Re: Citing increasing worker mobility between companies, poor financial [#permalink]
Hi Mike,
There are no parallel markers between citing and increasing. So where is the question of parallelism? They don't seem to be in a list.
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4452
Own Kudos [?]: 28571 [0]
Given Kudos: 130
Re: Citing increasing worker mobility between companies, poor financial [#permalink]
Expert Reply
vsprakash2003 wrote:
Hi Mike,
There are no parallel markers between citing and increasing. So where is the question of parallelism? They don't seem to be in a list.

I'm sorry --- I really don't understand what you are asking. Please make extremely clear what you are asking, and I will be happy to help.
Mike :-)
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 20 Aug 2012
Posts: 41
Own Kudos [?]: 55 [0]
Given Kudos: 5
Schools: Jones '15
Send PM
Re: Citing increasing worker mobility between companies, poor financial [#permalink]
mikemcgarry wrote:
vsprakash2003 wrote:
Hi Mike,
There are no parallel markers between citing and increasing. So where is the question of parallelism? They don't seem to be in a list.

I'm sorry --- I really don't understand what you are asking. Please make extremely clear what you are asking, and I will be happy to help.
Mike :-)


He has pointed out the parallelism between nouns versus all the items in -ing form but one of them is actually a verb. But I got to say, that was easy to miss.
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4452
Own Kudos [?]: 28571 [1]
Given Kudos: 130
Re: Citing increasing worker mobility between companies, poor financial [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
nanishora wrote:
mikemcgarry wrote:
vsprakash2003 wrote:
Hi Mike,
There are no parallel markers between citing and increasing. So where is the question of parallelism? They don't seem to be in a list.

I'm sorry --- I really don't understand what you are asking. Please make extremely clear what you are asking, and I will be happy to help.
Mike :-)

He has pointed out the parallelism between nouns versus all the items in -ing form but one of them is actually a verb. But I got to say, that was easy to miss.


Yes, this is a tricky sentence to sort out. I will try to explain.

Citing increasing worker mobility between companies, poor financial planning by workers, and finding that the plans themselves are excessively complex, the authors of a recent study have found that most eligible American workers had not made the maximum allowed contribution to their employer-offered retirement plans.

The participles "citing" and "finding" modify "the authors" (i.e. the main subject of the sentence). These both describe actions of the authors. Those two, by themselves, properly could be in parallel with each other.

The participle "increasing" merely modifies the noun "mobility" --- it's not part of any parallelism in and of itself. The noun "mobility" and the gerund "planning" are in parallel --- these are the two objects of the participle "citing" --- they are the things that the authors cited.

Then problem is ----- we have three terms joined by "and" ---- "...[A] mobility ..., ... [B] planning ...., and [C]finding ....." Term [C] is supposed to be in parallel with "citing", whereas terms [A] & [B] are objects of the participle "citing" in parallel with each other. This is a gross violation of parallelism.

Does all this make sense?

Mike :-)
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 13 Oct 2012
Posts: 28
Own Kudos [?]: -4 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Concentration: General Management, Leadership
Schools: IE '15 (A)
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V46
Send PM
Re: Citing increasing worker mobility between companies, poor financial [#permalink]
very nice question!! nouns such as worker mobility cannot be parallal to verbs such as finding.
Option E eliminates this issue
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 07 Sep 2010
Posts: 222
Own Kudos [?]: 5228 [0]
Given Kudos: 136
Send PM
Re: Citing increasing worker mobility between companies, poor financial [#permalink]
Dear Mike,

Would you please help in understanding the usage of the verb "Had not made". Is it correct.
I have seen instances where it is not used as a Past Perfect but simple a past tense of Have+ ed verb tense.

example:
In an attempt to attract more tourists,the Swiss government commissioned several life-size fiberglass cow statues, had
them decorated by local artists, and set them up on the streets of Zurich.


Can you please post your reasoning.

Thanks
Himanshu
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4452
Own Kudos [?]: 28571 [3]
Given Kudos: 130
Re: Citing increasing worker mobility between companies, poor financial [#permalink]
1
Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
imhimanshu wrote:
Dear Mike,

Would you please help in understanding the usage of the verb "Had not made". Is it correct.
I have seen instances where it is not used as a Past Perfect but simple a past tense of Have+ ed verb tense.

example:
In an attempt to attract more tourists,the Swiss government commissioned several life-size fiberglass cow statues, had them decorated by local artists, and set them up on the streets of Zurich.

Can you please post your reasoning.

Thanks
Himanshu

Dear Himanshu,
Yes, I'm happy to help. :-)

Let's distinguish precisely between two very closely related things

(1) "had" + "past participle of verb" = ALWAYS is the past perfect tense; for more on the perfect tenses, see:
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/gmat-verb- ... ct-tenses/
had bought
had sold
had carried
had decorated

All past perfect

(2) "had" + [noun] + "past participle of verb" = NEVER the perfect tense; this is an idiomatic construction for a command being carried out.
had the items bought
had the old car sold
had the books carried
had the fiberglass cow decorated

None of these are past perfect. In each case, the subject of the verb is someone who gave the command or the instructions for the action, and someone else entirely is actually carrying out the action. The person who performs the action could be the subject of a "by" preposition.
The Swiss government had several life-size fiberglass cow statues decorated by local artists.
The main subject = The Swiss government = the folks who gave the order, provided the conditions to allow the action to occur (probably paid money to make things happen)
The main verb = "had"
The direct object = "several life-size fiberglass cow statues"
participial phrase = decorated by local artists --- the local artist are the one who actually perform the action of decorating the cows, following the command or incentive of the Swiss government.

You see, in construction #1, the "had" and the past participle together form a single verb, which can be the main verb of a sentence or the verb of any subordinate clause. In construction #2, "had" is the whole verb all by itself, followed by a direct object, followed by a participial phrase. Here, the past participle opens the participial phrase, the noun modifier, and plays absolutely no part in the main verb of the sentence.

Does this distinction make sense?
Mike :-)
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Citing increasing worker mobility between companies, poor financial [#permalink]
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6920 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne