Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 14:39 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 14:39

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Difficulty: Sub 505 Levelx   Idioms/Diction/Redundancyx                        
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 14 Jul 2004
Posts: 360
Own Kudos [?]: 579 [74]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
CR Moderator
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2413
Own Kudos [?]: 15266 [35]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Send PM
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 14 May 2006
Posts: 709
Own Kudos [?]: 783 [22]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
General Discussion
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 14 Jul 2004
Posts: 360
Own Kudos [?]: 579 [3]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: If Dr. Wade was right, any apparent connection of the eating of highly [#permalink]
3
Kudos
After answering the aforementioned question could you please answer the following:

1) What is the tense of "be" - past tense, present tense or ?? I recognize that it is passive voice....

2) Why would this not be a "hypothetical" situation and hence the usage of "was" would automatically be wrong, no? I guess i'm confused as to what you'd call a hypothetical situation [which requires the need for If i were (Vs using was) you....] and why isnt the hypothetical case applicable here.
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Mar 2005
Posts: 252
Own Kudos [?]: 200 [8]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: If Dr. Wade was right, any apparent connection of the eating of highly [#permalink]
3
Kudos
5
Bookmarks
shoot is not in present tense. It is accompanied by would (model verb).

It is simple.

2 forms, sunjunctive and indictive

indictive means, the possibility is very high.

Indictive - why and reason... cause and effect...
If you score high in GMAT, you will be selected in a business school.

subjuctive, possibility is low or rare...hypotheical....

If I had scored high in GMAT, I would had been selected in a business school.
If you were a king, youwould have ruled the whole world.

Meaning, some condition that is hypothical.

But if the whole sentence is in present tense, it need to maintain the tense.

be is present
was is past
been is future...

in this present question, we are saying that if Dr. wade is right, the situation will happen or will not happen...
Dr. Wade has already proven it...

If you want to convert it to sunjunctive then

If Dr. Wade were right, any apperent connection between X and Y would be purely coincidental.
OR
Had Dr. Wade been right, any apperent connection between X and Y would had been purely coincidental.

Hope it helps.
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 800
Own Kudos [?]: 255 [1]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: If Dr. Wade was right, any apparent connection of the eating of highly [#permalink]
1
Kudos
this purely a conditional but not a subjunctive (hypothetical or contrary to fact) one. e.g.

if it were a subjunctive, it would have "were" as verb in the first clause.
it is not a subjunctive, it is perfectly ok with is as verb in the first clause. :wink:

So, D is correct.
Retired Thread Master
Joined: 06 May 2013
Posts: 75
Own Kudos [?]: 69 [0]
Given Kudos: 25
Location: Malawi
Concentration: Marketing, Technology
Schools: Tuck '20 (S)
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V40
GMAT 2: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3
WE:Consulting (Non-Profit and Government)
Send PM
Re: If Dr. Wade was right, any apparent connection of the eating of highly [#permalink]
Hi all, my doubt is,
1) Isn't excelling at sports a complex gerund? For example, drinking of the water.
2) Are complex gerunds always in the from of an Of-phrase?
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Posts: 587
Own Kudos [?]: 3156 [5]
Given Kudos: 322
Concentration: General Management, General Management
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.7
WE:Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Send PM
Re: If Dr. Wade was right, any apparent connection of the eating of highly [#permalink]
1
Kudos
4
Bookmarks
nikhil.jones.s wrote:
Hi all, my doubt is,
1) Isn't excelling at sports a complex gerund? For example, drinking of the water.
2) Are complex gerunds always in the from of an Of-phrase?


Hi there,


(1). Complex gerund is "The excelling at sports" and not "excelling at sports". Furthermore,

Often the construction of CG is "Article -Ing Preposition", but you cannot generalize it( This answers your second doubt)\

Excelling at sports is a simple gerund because we can use it as:

I am excelling at sports

Simple gerunds are Verb-like as shown above.

Complex gerunds are noun-like that is why when we want to adhere to parallelism , we make Complex Gerund parallel to action nouns not the simple gerunds parallel to action nouns.


Hope that helps!
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2010
Posts: 219
Own Kudos [?]: 1215 [2]
Given Kudos: 86
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
Send PM
Re: If Dr. Wade was right, any apparent connection of the eating of highly [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
A. 'eating of' is wrong
B. 'connection of' is wrong
C. 'eating of' is wrong
D. sounds fine; uses the idiom (between... and...) and parallelism (eating... excelling..) correctly
E. perfect tense is wrong as the main clause uses simple present 'is coincidental'
Intern
Intern
Joined: 05 Sep 2012
Posts: 5
Own Kudos [?]: 7 [2]
Given Kudos: 66
Send PM
Re: If Dr. Wade was right, any apparent connection of the eating of highly [#permalink]
2
Kudos
can any one explain why c is wrong. it corrects the Dr wade WAS to IS. secondly use proper idiom between thirdly the parallelism is ok "eating of" and "excelling at". and fourth "connection this is apparent" is also fine and is equal to "apparent connection"
Manager
Manager
Joined: 09 May 2016
Posts: 54
Own Kudos [?]: 52 [0]
Given Kudos: 12
Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Send PM
Re: If Dr. Wade was right, any apparent connection of the eating of highly [#permalink]
In official guide they have given below reason why E is incorrect:

Should Dr. Wade have been right should not be followed by the present
indicative verb is.

Can you pls explain this more
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 2642
Own Kudos [?]: 7775 [2]
Given Kudos: 55
GMAT 2: 780  Q50  V50
Send PM
Re: If Dr. Wade was right, any apparent connection of the eating of highly [#permalink]
2
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
KARISHMA315, the idea is that the clauses should match. "Should Dr. Wade have been right" introduces a conditional that should be followed by "any connection . . would have been coincidental" (if we're talking about a past connection) or "would be coincidental" (if we're talking about a current/future connection).
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 31 Jan 2019
Posts: 368
Own Kudos [?]: 43 [0]
Given Kudos: 530
Send PM
Re: If Dr. Wade was right, any apparent connection of the eating of highly [#permalink]
Got it correct but still thinking about why "eating" which is a verb is parallel to a gerund "excelling"?

Or maybe I am a doing a mistake of thinking "eating" as a verb instead of a "modifier"?

AndrewN
Intern
Intern
Joined: 24 Jun 2021
Posts: 20
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [0]
Given Kudos: 302
Send PM
Re: If Dr. Wade was right, any apparent connection of the eating of highly [#permalink]
If Dr. Wade was right, any apparent connection of the eating of highly processed foods and excelling at sports is purely coincidental.

The scentence intended to convey the meaning that if Dr.wade was right, the connection between eating highly processed foods and excelling at sports is coincidental)

(A) If Dr. Wade was right, any apparent connection of the eating of

(1."of the eating" does not make sense; 2. "of the eating... and excelling at sports" does not comply with parallelism; 3."between" should be the right word in the context. Eliminate)

(B) Should Dr. Wade be right, any apparent connection of eating (This expresssion is awkward and not idiomatic, eliminate)

(C) If Dr. Wade is right, any connection that is apparent between eating of (as an adjective, "apparent" should refer to connection, so it needs to be placed before connection. eliminate)

(D) If Dr. Wade is right, any apparent connection between eating

(E) Should Dr.Wade have been right, any connection apparent between eating (Same reason as choice C. Also, the use of perfect tense is awkward)
Manager
Manager
Joined: 31 Jan 2020
Posts: 233
Own Kudos [?]: 14 [1]
Given Kudos: 139
Send PM
If Dr. Wade was right, any apparent connection of the eating of highly [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
gmataquaguy wrote:
If Dr. Wade was right, any apparent connection of the eating of highly processed foods and excelling at sports is purely coincidental.


(A) If Dr. Wade was right, any apparent connection of the eating of

(B) Should Dr. Wade be right, any apparent connection of eating

(C) If Dr. Wade is right, any connection that is apparent between eating of

(D) If Dr. Wade is right, any apparent connection between eating

(E) Should Dr.Wade have been right, any connection apparent between eating


Dear Experts,

Apart from wordier in (C), the main reason to eliminate is “eating of”, right? : eating highly processed foods conveyed the meaning “eat processed food” but eating of highly processed foods conveyed the meaning “processed foods is a subject that perform action of “eat”” Then, (C) is wrong. Am I correct?

Posted from my mobile device
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Posts: 5123
Own Kudos [?]: 4683 [0]
Given Kudos: 38
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Send PM
Re: If Dr. Wade was right, any apparent connection of the eating of highly [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Tanchat wrote:
gmataquaguy wrote:
If Dr. Wade was right, any apparent connection of the eating of highly processed foods and excelling at sports is purely coincidental.


(A) If Dr. Wade was right, any apparent connection of the eating of

(B) Should Dr. Wade be right, any apparent connection of eating

(C) If Dr. Wade is right, any connection that is apparent between eating of

(D) If Dr. Wade is right, any apparent connection between eating

(E) Should Dr.Wade have been right, any connection apparent between eating


Dear Experts,

Apart from wordier in (C), the main reason to eliminate is “eating of”, right? : eating highly processed foods conveyed the meaning “eat processed food” but eating of highly processed foods conveyed the meaning “processed foods is a subject that perform action of “eat”” Then, (C) is wrong. Am I correct?

Posted from my mobile device


Hello Tanchat,

We hope this finds you well.

To answer your query, no; your reasoning is not exactly correct here; Option C actually leads to an incoherent meaning, as it uses the simple gerund "eating"; to convey the intended meaning, a complex gerund - one preceded by a preposition - is needed.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
Manager
Manager
Joined: 31 Jan 2020
Posts: 233
Own Kudos [?]: 14 [0]
Given Kudos: 139
Send PM
If Dr. Wade was right, any apparent connection of the eating of highly [#permalink]
ExpertsGlobal5 wrote:
Tanchat wrote:
gmataquaguy wrote:
If Dr. Wade was right, any apparent connection of the eating of highly processed foods and excelling at sports is purely coincidental.


(A) If Dr. Wade was right, any apparent connection of the eating of

(B) Should Dr. Wade be right, any apparent connection of eating

(C) If Dr. Wade is right, any connection that is apparent between eating of

(D) If Dr. Wade is right, any apparent connection between eating

(E) Should Dr.Wade have been right, any connection apparent between eating


Dear Experts,

Apart from wordier in (C), the main reason to eliminate is “eating of”, right? : eating highly processed foods conveyed the meaning “eat processed food” but eating of highly processed foods conveyed the meaning “processed foods is a subject that perform action of “eat”” Then, (C) is wrong. Am I correct?

Posted from my mobile device


Hello Tanchat,

We hope this finds you well.

To answer your query, no; your reasoning is not exactly correct here; Option C actually leads to an incoherent meaning, as it uses the simple gerund "eating"; to convey the intended meaning, a complex gerund - one preceded by a preposition - is needed.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team


ExpertsGlobal5

Thank you for the response. But I do still not understand. What is difference between the meaning of (C) and the meaning of (D)?

Also, what is difference between “eat” and “eating of”?
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Posts: 5123
Own Kudos [?]: 4683 [0]
Given Kudos: 38
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Send PM
Re: If Dr. Wade was right, any apparent connection of the eating of highly [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Tanchat wrote:

Thank you for the response. But I do still not understand. What is difference between the meaning of (C) and the meaning of (D)?

Also, what is difference between “eat” and “eating of”?


Hello Tanchat,

We hope this finds you well.

To answer your query, due to the construction of the phrase "between eating of", Option C actually produces an incoherent meaning.

Further, "eat" is an active verb, and "eating of" is a present participle ("verb+ing") phrase that acts as a gerund.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17213
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: If Dr. Wade was right, any apparent connection of the eating of highly [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: If Dr. Wade was right, any apparent connection of the eating of highly [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6920 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne