Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 10:23 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 10:23

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Retired Moderator
Joined: 27 Aug 2012
Posts: 1015
Own Kudos [?]: 4054 [77]
Given Kudos: 156
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
CR Moderator
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2413
Own Kudos [?]: 15266 [17]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Send PM
Director
Director
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Status:Retaking after 7 years
Posts: 860
Own Kudos [?]: 4468 [14]
Given Kudos: 221
Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
GPA: 3.75
Send PM
General Discussion
Retired Moderator
Joined: 27 Aug 2012
Posts: 1015
Own Kudos [?]: 4054 [1]
Given Kudos: 156
Send PM
Re: Archaeologist Donald Johanson wrote of his team's discovery of a 3.2 [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
Hi Verbal Experts,
Please share you analysis on this question...!
Retired Moderator
Joined: 27 Aug 2012
Posts: 1015
Own Kudos [?]: 4054 [0]
Given Kudos: 156
Send PM
Re: Archaeologist Donald Johanson wrote of his team's discovery of a 3.2 [#permalink]
Thanks marcab but I'm not able to understand why A is wrong as it is in the form of X of Y - 'wrote of discovery of a skeleton..in the book...'!! Heence it basically means wrote of his team's discovery in the book I guess...!

@ e-GMAT - Could you please explain this question and you've a PM on this..!
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 14 Dec 2012
Posts: 580
Own Kudos [?]: 4324 [0]
Given Kudos: 197
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.6
Send PM
Re: Archaeologist Donald Johanson wrote of his team's discovery of a 3.2 [#permalink]
bagdbmba wrote:
Thanks marcab but I'm not able to understand why A is wrong as it is in the form of X of Y - 'wrote of discovery of a skeleton..in the book...'!! Heence it basically means wrote of his team's discovery in the book I guess...!



IMO option A is wrong because of modifier placement error(as said by MARCAB)

Archaeologist Donald Johanson wrote of his team's discovery of a 3.2 million-year-old skeleton in his award-winning book Lucy: The Beginnings of Humankind.

IT SEEMS THAT SKELETON was in his award winning book=>this is illogical.
moreover i can say that in the absence of option E this could be the best choice.
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 08 Apr 2013
Posts: 100
Own Kudos [?]: 70 [1]
Given Kudos: 27
Send PM
Re: Archaeologist Donald Johanson wrote of his team's discovery of a 3.2 [#permalink]
1
Kudos
It is clear that the pattern in E is better than that in A.

but remember, this pattern in A is inferior, not incorrect. This means the pattern in A can appear in the official answer in other sc problems when there is no better choice.

this situation is called correct but not prefered
Director
Director
Joined: 03 Feb 2013
Posts: 797
Own Kudos [?]: 2588 [1]
Given Kudos: 567
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.88
WE:Engineering (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: Archaeologist Donald Johanson wrote of his team's discovery of a 3.2 [#permalink]
1
Kudos
A similar Official question is : the-nephew-of-pliny-the-elder-wrote-the-only-eyewitness-85872.html

Verbal 2nd Edition Question # 109.

The rule which I am following is "in his award-winning book Lucy: The Beginnings of Humankind." should modify the verb - "wrote " so it should be an adverbial modifier and should come before and should make sense with the verb wrote.

Archaeologist Donald Johanson wrote of his team's discovery of a 3.2 million-year-old skeleton in his award-winning book Lucy: The Beginnings of Humankind.

A.Archaeologist Donald Johanson wrote of his team's discovery of a 3.2 million-year-old skeleton in his award-winning book Lucy: The Beginnings of Humankind. - It is incorrect because of the above reason

B.In his award-winning book Lucy: The Beginnings of Humankind, archaeologist Donald Johanson wrote of the discovery by his team of a 3.2 million-year-old skeleton.
Not concise

C.Writing the award-winning book Lucy: The Beginnings of Humankind, archaeologist Donald Johanson chronicled the discovery of a 3.2 million-year-old skeleton by his team.
Writing sounds as if DJ is writing the book now.

D.The discovery of a 3.2 million-year-old skeleton was chronicled in the award-winning book Lucy: The Beginnings of Humankind, being written by the archaeologist Donald Johanson.
DJ is not writing the book as we speak.

E.In his award-winning book Lucy: The Beginnings of Humankind, archaeologist Donald Johanson wrote of his team's discovery of a 3.2 million-year-old skeleton - Correct.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 12 Jul 2014
Posts: 22
Own Kudos [?]: 11 [0]
Given Kudos: 65
Send PM
Re: Archaeologist Donald Johanson wrote of his team's discovery of a 3.2 [#permalink]
A looks good.
Archaeologist DJ wrote of X in his Y
B seems wordy. Writing the Y, archaeologist DJ "chronicled" the discovery of X.
C changes the meaning I think. DJ is writing the book and chronicled the discovery? As opposed to "wrote" that is used in other choices.
Eliminate D because there are better ways to send meaning without using "being"
Looking at E, I notice B is wordy because it uses "of the discovery by his team of..." as opposed to "of his team's discovery..." in E.

So A and E left.
I guess E is preferable for the reasons you guys stated.
Board of Directors
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2163
Own Kudos [?]: 1180 [0]
Given Kudos: 236
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE:General Management (Transportation)
Send PM
Re: Archaeologist Donald Johanson wrote of his team's discovery of a 3.2 [#permalink]
but isn't E ambiguous?

In his (whose) award-winning book Lucy: The Beginnings of Humankind, archaeologist Donald Johanson (this might be something from the book, and Donald Johanson is a character who is an archaeologist) wrote of his team's discovery of a 3.2 million-year-old skeleton
Intern
Intern
Joined: 09 Nov 2015
Posts: 24
Own Kudos [?]: 14 [0]
Given Kudos: 130
GMAT 1: 640 Q49 V29
GMAT 2: 720 Q50 V38
Send PM
Re: Archaeologist Donald Johanson wrote of his team's discovery of a 3.2 [#permalink]
He wrote X in Y. Why is (A) wrong?
Intern
Intern
Joined: 09 Nov 2015
Posts: 24
Own Kudos [?]: 14 [0]
Given Kudos: 130
GMAT 1: 640 Q49 V29
GMAT 2: 720 Q50 V38
Send PM
Re: Archaeologist Donald Johanson wrote of his team's discovery of a 3.2 [#permalink]
sayantanc2k wrote:
ravi19012015 wrote:
He wrote X in Y. Why is (A) wrong?


A prepositional phrase may be used as a noun modifier or a verb modifier. As a noun modifier, it refers to the noun it touches, and as a verb modifier, it refers to the verb of the associated clause (placement of a verb modifier is flexible - it may be placed at the beginning, at the end or in the middle of the clause). In order to avoid ambiguity, when such a prepositional phrase is used a verb modifier, it is preferable to shift the modifier away from any noun that it may refer to.

In option A the prepositional phrase modifier "in his award-winning book Lucy: The Beginnings of Humankind" is used as verb modifier to refer to the verb "wrote". So it is preferable to shift it away from the noun "skeleton". Otherwise an ambiguity may arise whether it refers to the verb " wrote" or to the noun " skeleton" (the latter wrongly implying that the skeleton is in the book).


This one is important. Can result into silly mistakes. I learnt it earlier, but while hastily solving the questions, I miss this point.
Important to focus on Meaning of the sentence.
Thanks
Manager
Manager
Joined: 12 Oct 2015
Posts: 238
Own Kudos [?]: 360 [0]
Given Kudos: 144
Location: Canada
Concentration: Leadership, Accounting
GMAT 1: 700 Q47 V39
GPA: 3
WE:Accounting (Accounting)
Send PM
Re: Archaeologist Donald Johanson wrote of his team's discovery of a 3.2 [#permalink]
sayantanc2k wrote:
ravi19012015 wrote:
He wrote X in Y. Why is (A) wrong?


A prepositional phrase may be used as a noun modifier or a verb modifier. As a noun modifier, it refers to the noun it touches, and as a verb modifier, it refers to the verb of the associated clause (placement of a verb modifier is flexible - it may be placed at the beginning, at the end or in the middle of the clause). In order to avoid ambiguity, when such a prepositional phrase is used a verb modifier, it is preferable to shift the modifier away from any noun that it may refer to.

In option A the prepositional phrase modifier "in his award-winning book Lucy: The Beginnings of Humankind" is used as verb modifier to refer to the verb "wrote". So it is preferable to shift it away from the noun "skeleton". Otherwise an ambiguity may arise whether it refers to the verb " wrote" or to the noun " skeleton" (the latter wrongly implying that the skeleton is in the book).


Hi Sayant,
May I ask, what is the best way to perform an error analysis when reading a sentence while fatigued. Often the brain doesn't pick up on these subtle clues since we're accustomed to making sense of whatever we are told. Are there are signals for noun vs verb modifiers.

For instance parallelism markers are: And, or, either or etc... Are there words that help us spot these modifiers quickly and help differentiate between verb vs noun modifiers. Sorry brain very tired! :) Would appreciate some insight :) :)
CR Moderator
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2413
Own Kudos [?]: 15266 [1]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Send PM
Re: Archaeologist Donald Johanson wrote of his team's discovery of a 3.2 [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
jkolachi wrote:
sayantanc2k wrote:
ravi19012015 wrote:
He wrote X in Y. Why is (A) wrong?


A prepositional phrase may be used as a noun modifier or a verb modifier. As a noun modifier, it refers to the noun it touches, and as a verb modifier, it refers to the verb of the associated clause (placement of a verb modifier is flexible - it may be placed at the beginning, at the end or in the middle of the clause). In order to avoid ambiguity, when such a prepositional phrase is used a verb modifier, it is preferable to shift the modifier away from any noun that it may refer to.

In option A the prepositional phrase modifier "in his award-winning book Lucy: The Beginnings of Humankind" is used as verb modifier to refer to the verb "wrote". So it is preferable to shift it away from the noun "skeleton". Otherwise an ambiguity may arise whether it refers to the verb " wrote" or to the noun " skeleton" (the latter wrongly implying that the skeleton is in the book).


Hi Sayant,
May I ask, what is the best way to perform an error analysis when reading a sentence while fatigued. Often the brain doesn't pick up on these subtle clues since we're accustomed to making sense of whatever we are told. Are there are signals for noun vs verb modifiers.

For instance parallelism markers are: And, or, either or etc... Are there words that help us spot these modifiers quickly and help differentiate between verb vs noun modifiers. Sorry brain very tired! :) Would appreciate some insight :) :)


First let me tell you my understanding: Unlike the muscles of our body, the brain does not get fatigued (though the eyes may). Actually the resistance of the mind to continue with the work gives us the illusion of brain-tiredness. Training the mind may help overcome this issue to some extent. (Consider a teenager playing hours of computer games (requiring very high levels of brain work) without feeling tired, but when asked to do maths, he gets tired quite early.)

Coming to your query, all verb modifiers act as adverbs (i.e. they say something more about the action), and all noun modifiers act as adjectives (i.e. they say something more about the person or thing). If you can identify an adverb and an adjective, you should be able identify a verb modifier and a noun modifier as well - the concept is the same.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Status: enjoying
Posts: 5265
Own Kudos [?]: 42104 [1]
Given Kudos: 422
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Send PM
Re: Archaeologist Donald Johanson wrote of his team's discovery of a 3.2 [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
Top Contributor
Archaeologist Donald Johanson wrote of his team's discovery of a 3.2 million-year-old skeleton in his award-winning book Lucy: The Beginnings of Humankind.

A. Archaeologist Donald Johanson wrote of his team's discovery of a 3.2 million-year-old skeleton in his award-winning book Lucy: The Beginnings of Humankind. ….. The misplaced word order leads to the absurd meaning that the discovery happened just in the said book.

B. In his award-winning book Lucy: The Beginnings of Humankind, archaeologist Donald Johanson wrote of the discovery by his team of a 3.2 million-year-old skeleton. -- The team is described as something of a skeleton.

C. Writing the award-winning book Lucy: The Beginnings of Humankind, archaeologist Donald Johanson chronicled the discovery of a 3.2 million-year-old skeleton by his team… The word 'chronicled' implies a sequential timeline, but the text talks about only dating the discovery. This is a gross altered intent.

D. The discovery of a 3.2 million-year-old skeleton was chronicled in the award-winning book Lucy: The Beginnings of Humankind, being written by the archaeologist Donald Johanson. ---- Same error as in C.

E. In his award-winning, book Lucy: The Beginnings of Humankind, archaeologist Donald Johanson wrote of his team's discovery of a 3.2 million-year-old skeleton.--- The correct answer. The introductory adverbial modifier correctly modifies the following clause in its entirety namely -- the archeologist's action of writing -- as Sayantan has abundantly made clear.
VP
VP
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1030
Own Kudos [?]: 1779 [0]
Given Kudos: 2562
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
Send PM
Re: Archaeologist Donald Johanson wrote of his team's discovery of a 3.2 [#permalink]
B is an important pattern in gmat b/c in B, the long phrase distorts the original meaning of the sentence.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Status: enjoying
Posts: 5265
Own Kudos [?]: 42104 [0]
Given Kudos: 422
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Send PM
Re: Archaeologist Donald Johanson wrote of his team's discovery of a 3.2 [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Top Contributor
Archaeologist Donald Johanson wrote of his team's discovery of a 3.2 million-year-old skeleton in his award-winning book Lucy: The Beginnings of Humankind.
1. Archaeologist Donald Johanson wrote of his team's discovery of a 3.2 million-year-old skeleton in his award-winning book Lucy: The Beginnings of Humankind.

A. Archaeologist Donald Johanson wrote of his team's discovery of a 3.2 million-year-old skeleton in his award-winning book Lucy: The Beginnings of Humankind.

B.In his award-winning book Lucy: The Beginnings of Humankind, archaeologist Donald Johanson wrote of the discovery by his team of a 3.2 million-year-old skeleton.

C.Writing the award-winning book Lucy: The Beginnings of Humankind, archaeologist Donald Johanson chronicled the discovery of a 3.2 million-year-old skeleton by his team.

D.The discovery of a 3.2 million-year-old skeleton was chronicled in the award-winning book Lucy: The Beginnings of Humankind, being written by the archaeologist Donald Johanson.

E.In his award-winning book Lucy: The Beginnings of Humankind, archaeologist Donald Johanson wrote of his team's discovery of a 3.2 million-year-old skeleton.
I wish to withdraw my comment about this post a little above; this topic is debatable, I feel.

1. The thumb rule for the use of a colon is that there is should be an independent clause that is complete in its meaning before the use of a colon. However, in choices B, C, and E (E is the official answer), there are only phrases.
2. A is wrong because of the misplacement of the skeleton before the award-winning book, giving a twist that the skeleton was discovered in his book.
3. D is wrong for using the participle 'being written' as if the book is just being written now and is yet to be published.

Any clarifications?
Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Status:Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Posts: 2101
Own Kudos [?]: 8809 [0]
Given Kudos: 171
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.2
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Send PM
Archaeologist Donald Johanson wrote of his team's discovery of a 3.2 [#permalink]
daagh wrote:
Archaeologist Donald Johanson wrote of his team's discovery of a 3.2 million-year-old skeleton in his award-winning book Lucy: The Beginnings of Humankind.
1. Archaeologist Donald Johanson wrote of his team's discovery of a 3.2 million-year-old skeleton in his award-winning book Lucy: The Beginnings of Humankind.

A. Archaeologist Donald Johanson wrote of his team's discovery of a 3.2 million-year-old skeleton in his award-winning book Lucy: The Beginnings of Humankind.

B.In his award-winning book Lucy: The Beginnings of Humankind, archaeologist Donald Johanson wrote of the discovery by his team of a 3.2 million-year-old skeleton.

C.Writing the award-winning book Lucy: The Beginnings of Humankind, archaeologist Donald Johanson chronicled the discovery of a 3.2 million-year-old skeleton by his team.

D.The discovery of a 3.2 million-year-old skeleton was chronicled in the award-winning book Lucy: The Beginnings of Humankind, being written by the archaeologist Donald Johanson.

E.In his award-winning book Lucy: The Beginnings of Humankind, archaeologist Donald Johanson wrote of his team's discovery of a 3.2 million-year-old skeleton.
I wish to withdraw my comment about this post a little above; this topic is debatable, I feel.

1. The thumb rule for the use of a colon is that there is should be an independent clause that is complete in its meaning before the use of a colon. However, in choices B, C, and E (E is the official answer), there are only phrases.
2. A is wrong because of the misplacement of the skeleton before the award-winning book, giving a twist that the skeleton was discovered in his book.
3. D is wrong for using the participle 'being written' as if the book is just being written now and is yet to be published.

Any clarifications?


As stated by daagh in the above post, the part of the sentence before a colon(:) should be a complete sentence. However, the OA - E violates this rule.

AjiteshArun , GMATNinja , MagooshExpert , GMATGuruNY , VeritasPrepBrian , MartyMurray , DmitryFarber , egmat , ccooley , generis , RonPurewal , other experts - please enlighten
Senior SC Moderator
Joined: 22 May 2016
Posts: 5330
Own Kudos [?]: 35490 [1]
Given Kudos: 9464
Send PM
Archaeologist Donald Johanson wrote of his team's discovery of a 3.2 [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
Skywalker18 wrote:
daagh wrote:
Archaeologist Donald Johanson wrote of his team's discovery of a 3.2 million-year-old skeleton in his award-winning book Lucy: The Beginnings of Humankind.
1. Archaeologist Donald Johanson wrote of his team's discovery of a 3.2 million-year-old skeleton in his award-winning book Lucy: The Beginnings of Humankind.

A. Archaeologist Donald Johanson wrote of his team's discovery of a 3.2 million-year-old skeleton in his award-winning book Lucy: The Beginnings of Humankind.

B.In his award-winning book Lucy: The Beginnings of Humankind, archaeologist Donald Johanson wrote of the discovery by his team of a 3.2 million-year-old skeleton.

C.Writing the award-winning book Lucy: The Beginnings of Humankind, archaeologist Donald Johanson chronicled the discovery of a 3.2 million-year-old skeleton by his team.

D.The discovery of a 3.2 million-year-old skeleton was chronicled in the award-winning book Lucy: The Beginnings of Humankind, being written by the archaeologist Donald Johanson.

E.In his award-winning book Lucy: The Beginnings of Humankind, archaeologist Donald Johanson wrote of his team's discovery of a 3.2 million-year-old skeleton.
I wish to withdraw my comment about this post a little above; this topic is debatable, I feel.

1. The thumb rule for the use of a colon is that there is should be an independent clause that is complete in its meaning before the use of a colon. However, in choices B, C, and E (E is the official answer), there are only phrases.
2. A is wrong because of the misplacement of the skeleton before the award-winning book, giving a twist that the skeleton was discovered in his book.
3. D is wrong for using the participle 'being written' as if the book is just being written now and is yet to be published.

Any clarifications?


As stated by daagh in the above post, the part of the sentence before a colon(:) should be a complete sentence. However, the OA - E violates this rule.

AjiteshArun , GMATNinja , MagooshExpert , GMATGuruNY , VeritasPrepBrian , MartyMurray , DmitryFarber , egmat , ccooley , generis , RonPurewal , other experts - please enlighten

skywalker18 , I am beginning to believe that you might be an editor in disguise. :) You have very keen eyes.

In English, the rule about colons is suspended for titles.

The GMAT will replicate a title faithfully, such as S. Sandberg's Lean In: Women, Work, and the Will to Lead. Do not worry about the title. Just be concerned about whether the titled work (book, article, music piece) is positioned or modified correctly.

On the GMAT and in formal writing, with the exception of titles and newspaper captions, whatever precedes the colon must be an independent clause.

Again, the rule is suspended for titles.

The situation is similar to that in journalism, in which catchy headlines do not have to be grammatically correct. Even in the very best of publications, headline writers often use colons incorrectly. This usage is accepted. Titles and headlines are ways to grab attention.

Hope that helps.


If you would like additional sources,
1) Ron Purewal says HERE that there are two instances in which a colon may be used, and that in both, what precedes the colon must be an independent clause.

2) Former Grockit expert Jordan Schonig concurs HERE.
VP
VP
Joined: 15 Dec 2016
Posts: 1374
Own Kudos [?]: 207 [0]
Given Kudos: 189
Send PM
Archaeologist Donald Johanson wrote of his team's discovery of a 3.2 [#permalink]
avigutman - focussing on the core meaning - is that how you knock out (b) and (c) ?

regarding (c) - people keep saying -- writing and chronicled are wrong but i dont see why

I believe this question is based off of this Official quesiton :

https://gmatclub.com/forum/the-nephew-o ... 85872.html

Originally posted by jabhatta2 on 20 Nov 2022, 21:52.
Last edited by jabhatta2 on 21 Nov 2022, 05:41, edited 1 time in total.
GMAT Club Bot
Archaeologist Donald Johanson wrote of his team's discovery of a 3.2 [#permalink]
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne