sadovskiya wrote:
I was settling on E, but I found the ",and ____, and ____" to be redundant. Someone please refresh my memory. Thanks.
Dear
sadovskiya,
I'm happy to respond.
What's very tricky about this problem is the
nested parallelism, that is,
one parallel structure inside another. It's perfectly true that with a single parallel structure, we absolutely would not repeat the word "
and."
I want to do W and X and Y and Z.
Colloquially, one might say that for dramatic effect, but it would never be correct in the formalism demanded of the GMAT. It's unnecessarily wordy & redundant. That's perfectly clear.
It becomes very tricky when we
nest parallelism, that is to say, when we put
one parallel structure inside another. Let's start with this sentence:
He likes to read books and to take long walks at twilight.
That has simple parallelism --- the two infinitives in parallel, the two things this person likes to do. So far so good. Now, consider this sentence:
He likes to read mystery, Gothic novels, and books about the paranormal..
Again, perfectly fine simple parallelism --- here, the three things the person likes to read. Now, consider what happens when we combine all this information:
He likes to read mystery, Gothic novels, and books about the paranormal, and to take long walks at twilight..
That sentence is 100% grammatically correct. The subject matter is a bit to storybook for the GMAT, but the grammatical structure is typical of what could appear on the GMAT. Here, the parallelism of the different book types is the "inner parallelism", and the first "
and" is for this list; the parallelism of the two infinitive phrases, what he likes to do, is the outer parallelism, and the second "
and" is for that list. After the simple subject & verb, "
he likes", we have two infinitive phrases in parallel, and inside the first of those infinitive phrases is a second parallel structure, the kinds of books. The two "
and's" in this sentence have very different jobs are very different from doubling up "
and's" in the same list.
One of the trickiest things about the GMAT SC is the way that almost any grammatical structure can be nested inside almost any other structure. GMAT SC sentences can be like "Russian dolls", with shorter structures nested inside larger structures, and the hardest thing to do with each conjunction & adverb & etc. it to figure out to which level of the sentence it applies.
Does all this make sense?
Mike