Mark To convey an understanding of past events, a historian

Mark: To convey an understanding of past events, a historian should try to capture what it was like to experience those events. For instance, a foot soldier in the Battle of Waterloo knew through direct experience what the battle was like, and it is this kind of knowledge that the historian must capture.

Carla: But how do you go about choosing whose perspective is the valid one? Is the foot soldier's perspective more valid than that of a general? Should it be a French or an English soldier? Your approach would generate a biased version of history and to avoid that, historians must stick to general and objective characterizations of the past.

Mark's and Carla's positions indicate that they disagree about the truth of which one of the following?

(A) The purpose of writing history is to convey an understanding of past events.
(B) The participants in a battle are capable of having an objective understandilg of the ramifications of the events in which they are participating.
(C) Historians can succeed in conveying a sense of the way events in the distant past seemed to someone who lived in a past time.
(D) Historians should aim to convey past events from the perspective of participants in those events.
(E) Historians shouid use fictional episodes to supplement their accounts of past events if the documented record of those events is incomplete.