NEW HERE? LEARN MORE
closeclose
Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 12:53 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 12:54
Decision Tracker
My Rewards
New posts
New comers' posts

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel

Although the number of large artificial satellites orbiting the Earth

SORT BY:
Date
Kudos
Tags:
Difficulty: Sub 505 Levelx   Complete the Passagex                  
Find Similar Topics 
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
prasannar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 354
Own Kudos [?]: 3664 [32]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Although the number of large artificial satellites orbiting the Earth [#permalink] New post   19 Apr 2008, 03:51
11
Kudos
21
Bookmarks
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

5% (low)

Question Stats:

89% (01:29) correct 11% (01:57) wrong based on 3603 sessions
Hide Show timer Statistics
Which of the following most logically completes the argument below?

Although the number of large artificial satellites orbiting the Earth is small compared to the number of small pieces of debris in orbit, the large satellites interfere more seriously with telescope observations because of the strong reflections they produce. Because many of those large satellites have ceased to function, the proposal has recently been made to eliminate interference from nonfunctioning satellites by exploding them in space. This proposal, however, is ill conceived, since _______.

(A) many nonfunctioning satellites remain in orbit for years

(B) for satellites that have ceased to function, repairing them while they are in orbit would be prohibitively expensive

(C) there are no known previous instances of satellites’ having been exploded on purpose

(D) the only way to make telescope observations without any interference from debris in orbit is to use telescopes launched into extremely high orbits around the Earth

(E) a greatly increased number of small particles in Earth’s orbit would result in a blanket of reflections that would make certain valuable telescope observations impossible

Show Spoiler
Artificial Satellites

Step 1: Identify the Question

This is a Fill in the Blank question. Typically, Fill in the Blank questions are actually Strengthen the Argument questions, although you’ll need to read the argument fully to be certain.

Step 2: Deconstruct the Argument

Sats vs small debris: fewer sats, but interfere more with telescopes

Proposal: explode sats to stop interference

© proposal is bad

The conclusion of this argument is that the proposal is ill conceived. The word proposal refers to the proposal that satellites be exploded in space. The blank in the argument is connected to the conclusion with the word since, indicating that the blank will provide support for the conclusion. Treat this as a Strengthen problem.

Step 3: Pause and State the Goal

On Strengthen problems, the right answer will make the conclusion more likely to be correct. In this case, the conclusion is that the proposal (exploding the satellites) is ill conceived. The right answer will support the idea that the proposal is ill conceived. That is, it will work against the proposal.

Step 4: Work from Wrong to Right

(A) This answer choice does not clarify whether exploding the satellites is a good idea. If nonfunctioning satellites remain in orbit for years, exploding them could either be good (because it will reduce strong reflections without consequences) or bad (because it will have unintended negative consequences).

(B) This answer choice actually works in favor of the proposal, not against it. If the satellites cannot be repaired, then exploding them makes more sense.

(C) This answer choice suggests that because the plan has not been tried before, it is a bad idea. However, the argument does not show this, and it isn’t necessarily true. With the information provided, it’s equally likely that exploding the satellites will be unexpectedly bad, or unexpectedly successful.

(D) This answer choice seems to imply that because the proposal will not eliminate all interference, it will not be successful. However, the argument does not state that the purpose of the proposal is to eliminate all interference. Instead, the purpose is to eliminate interference from nonfunctioning satellites. If the proposal eliminates this specific source of interference, it will be successful, even if there is still some interference affecting ground telescope observations.

(E) CORRECT. The argument does not state that the leftover debris from exploding the satellites will be removed. Presumably, it will remain in orbit, and there will therefore be a larger amount of small debris in orbit. This answer choice states that an increased amount of small debris would prevent certain telescope observations. Preventing these observations is a potential drawback of the plan.
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
E
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
L
KarishmaB
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14823
Own Kudos [?]: 64920 [17]
Given Kudos: 426
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
Re: Although the number of large artificial satellites orbiting the Earth [#permalink] New post   04 Jul 2012, 00:06
13
Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
prasannar wrote:
Although the number of large artificial satellites orbiting the Earth is small compared to
the number of small pieces of debris in orbit, the large satellites interfere more seriously
with telescope observations because of the strong reflections they produce. Because
many of those large satellites have ceased to function, the proposal has recently been
made to eliminate interference from nonfunctioning satellites by exploding them in space.
This proposal, however, is ill conceived, since _______.
A. many nonfunctioning satellites remain in orbit for years
B. for satellites that have ceased to function, repairing them while they are in orbit
would be prohibitively expensive
C. there are no known previous instances of satellites’ having been exploded on
purpose
D. the only way to make telescope observations without any interference from debris
in orbit is to use telescopes launched into extremely high orbits around the Earth
E. a greatly increased number of small particles in Earth’s orbit would result in a
blanket of reflections that would make certain valuable telescope observations
impossible


Responding to a pm:

Problem: Debris interferes with telescope observations but a few large satellites interfere more seriously because of strong reflections.
Solution: Explode the satellites. Since large satellites interfere more seriously, convert them to debris. The interference will be reduced since debris causes less interference.

Question: What is the problem with the solution?
(E) A large increases in the number of small particles will create a blanket of reflections. This will cause serious interference with telescope observations. Makes sense. Correct answer.
(D) Doesn't tell us why it is a bad idea to convert satellites to debris. Just says what you should do if you want to get rid of interference completely. Our plan is to decrease interference and this option doesn't tell us why it will not work. We have to focus on the option that tells us exactly why our plan will not work. Our plan is not to completely get rid of interference but to reduce it. We want to improve the observations. It tells us what we can do to make them perfect. But it doesn't say that we will not be able to improve our observations using our solution.
General Discussion
User avatar
bsd_lover
SVP
SVP
Joined: 17 May 2007
Posts: 2437
Own Kudos [?]: 1682 [1]
Given Kudos: 210
Send PM
Re: Although the number of large artificial satellites orbiting the Earth [#permalink] New post   19 Apr 2008, 04:30
1
Kudos
Its a close one between D and E - I go for E but very reluctantly. I'd be interested to see the OE for this.

prasannar wrote:
Although the number of large artificial satellites orbiting the Earth is small compared to
the number of small pieces of debris in orbit, the large satellites interfere more seriously
with telescope observations because of the strong reflections they produce. Because
many of those large satellites have ceased to function, the proposal has recently been
made to eliminate interference from nonfunctioning satellites by exploding them in space.
This proposal, however, is ill conceived, since _______.
A. many nonfunctioning satellites remain in orbit for years [Irrelevant]
B. for satellites that have ceased to function, repairing them while they are in orbit
would be prohibitively expensive [supports]
C. there are no known previous instances of satellites’ having been exploded on
purpose [out of scope]
D. the only way to make telescope observations without any interference from debris
in orbit is to use telescopes launched into extremely high orbits around the Earth [this attacks the plan by finding a potential use for the satellites]
E. a greatly increased number of small particles in Earth’s orbit would result in a
blanket of reflections that would make certain valuable telescope observations
impossible [this attacks the plan by finding dangerous repercussions of the plan]
avatar
pmenon
Director
Director
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 697
Own Kudos [?]: 535 [1]
Given Kudos: 2
Send PM
Re: Although the number of large artificial satellites orbiting the Earth [#permalink] New post   19 Apr 2008, 05:53
1
Kudos
im almost certain that this one is E.
User avatar
bkk145
Director
Director
Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Posts: 654
Own Kudos [?]: 1575 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Although the number of large artificial satellites orbiting the Earth [#permalink] New post   19 Apr 2008, 07:15
prasannar wrote:
Although the number of large artificial satellites orbiting the Earth is small compared to
the number of small pieces of debris in orbit, the large satellites interfere more seriously
with telescope observations because of the strong reflections they produce. Because
many of those large satellites have ceased to function, the proposal has recently been
made to eliminate interference from nonfunctioning satellites by exploding them in space.
This proposal, however, is ill conceived, since _______.
A. many nonfunctioning satellites remain in orbit for years
B. for satellites that have ceased to function, repairing them while they are in orbit
would be prohibitively expensive
C. there are no known previous instances of satellites’ having been exploded on
purpose
D. the only way to make telescope observations without any interference from debris
in orbit is to use telescopes launched into extremely high orbits around the Earth
E. a greatly increased number of small particles in Earth’s orbit would result in a
blanket of reflections that would make certain valuable telescope observations
impossible


E. exploding satellite makes more interferences; hence, ill conceived.
User avatar
gmat blows
Manager
Manager
Joined: 19 Aug 2007
Posts: 113
Own Kudos [?]: 587 [1]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Although the number of large artificial satellites orbiting the Earth [#permalink] New post   20 Apr 2008, 16:57
1
Kudos
prasannar wrote:
Although the number of large artificial satellites orbiting the Earth is small compared to
the number of small pieces of debris in orbit, the large satellites interfere more seriously
with telescope observations because of the strong reflections they produce. Because
many of those large satellites have ceased to function, the proposal has recently been
made to eliminate interference from nonfunctioning satellites by exploding them in space.
This proposal, however, is ill conceived, since _______.
A. many nonfunctioning satellites remain in orbit for years
B. for satellites that have ceased to function, repairing them while they are in orbit
would be prohibitively expensive
C. there are no known previous instances of satellites’ having been exploded on
purpose
D. the only way to make telescope observations without any interference from debris
in orbit is to use telescopes launched into extremely high orbits around the Earth
E. a greatly increased number of small particles in Earth’s orbit would result in a
blanket of reflections that would make certain valuable telescope observations
impossible


I was stuck between D and E but chose D.

For E to work, we have to assume that exploding them will indeed increase number of small particles IN THE ORBIT that interferes with the telescope observations (what if exploding it allows the particles to be shoot out so far out into space that it may increase the number of small particles but is now in an orbit that wont interfere with the telescope observations so it doesnt matter that the number increased)
where as with D, we can try to modify all the other factors (i.e. remove debris or explode large satellites) but if the problem remains with the telescope itself, doing all of that is not going to make a difference.
User avatar
kyatin
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Jan 2007
Posts: 250
Own Kudos [?]: 145 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: Earth
 Q50  V40
Send PM
Re: Although the number of large artificial satellites orbiting the Earth [#permalink] New post   20 Apr 2008, 23:42
This one is close but I pick E.

because questions is why the idea of exploding is ill conceived..this idea will make problem qouted in D worse but that problem will exist even without this explosion solution.
E is more direct I believe.
User avatar
dushver
Manager
Manager
Joined: 16 Aug 2004
Posts: 191
Own Kudos [?]: 143 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: India
Send PM
Re: Although the number of large artificial satellites orbiting the Earth [#permalink] New post   21 Apr 2008, 03:28
One more for E, best choice among the available options.
User avatar
mourinhogmat1
Manager
Manager
Joined: 08 Jun 2010
Posts: 216
Own Kudos [?]: 196 [0]
Given Kudos: 13
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Finance
Schools: Darden '15 (D) Wharton '15 (D) Johnson '15 (S)
GMAT 1: 680 Q50 V32
Send PM
Re: Although the number of large artificial satellites orbiting the Earth [#permalink] New post   04 Jul 2012, 00:17
I agree E is the only solution which points out the problem with the proposal. The argument is awfully wordy. You need to cut the fluff to really get to the crux.
avatar
Achu
Intern
Intern
Joined: 22 Oct 2012
Posts: 15
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [1]
Given Kudos: 32
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Marketing
Send PM
Re: Although the number of large artificial satellites orbiting the Earth [#permalink] New post   14 Jun 2013, 09:52
1
Kudos
Debris causes little interference, while satellites causes more.

Little interference is not the problem.....so we can live with debris that goes round merrily.

Hence, D is a good solution, but doesn't help with the main issue....kaput satellites!....so D doesn't address the main issue.

They suggest exploding the satellites....which may cause 'more' debris......'less' debris is ok..more debris may cause more interference....hence ill conceived....E says it all.

Hope this helps
User avatar
B
LogicGuru1
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 04 Jun 2016
Posts: 484
Own Kudos [?]: 2335 [0]
Given Kudos: 36
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V43
Send PM
Re: Although the number of large artificial satellites orbiting the Earth [#permalink] New post   09 Jul 2016, 05:57
D is incorrect because, if the only way to make good observations without interference is to launch the telescope into the space itself, then there is no need to explode the satellites in the first place.
E is also a third rate option because "Explode" can mean many things, - a blast that creates small pieces (if this is the case then E is correct), or a blast that generates so much heat that completely vaporises the material (then E is wrong), a blast that creates so much of the momentum that the resulting fragments are thrown away into outer space away from the field of view of the telescope (then this is again wrong)... Also the use of phrase in E "certain valuable telescope observations impossible" restricts it as a good option..

Well, so much for a concise and clear answer.
I will still chose E if i encounter such a silly question in GMAT

prasannar wrote:
Although the number of large artificial satellites orbiting the Earth is small compared to the number of small pieces of debris in orbit, the large satellites interfere more seriously with telescope observations because of the strong reflections they produce. Because many of those large satellites have ceased to function, the proposal has recently been made to eliminate interference from nonfunctioning satellites by exploding them in space.
This proposal, however, is ill conceived, since _______.

A. many nonfunctioning satellites remain in orbit for years
B. for satellites that have ceased to function, repairing them while they are in orbit would be prohibitively expensive
C. there are no known previous instances of satellites’ having been exploded on purpose
D. the only way to make telescope observations without any interference from debris in orbit is to use telescopes launched into extremely high orbits around the Earth
E. a greatly increased number of small particles in Earth’s orbit would result in a blanket of reflections that would make certain valuable telescope observations impossible
User avatar
S
Nunuboy1994
Director
Director
Joined: 12 Nov 2016
Posts: 569
Own Kudos [?]: 118 [0]
Given Kudos: 167
Location: United States
Schools: Yale '18
GMAT 1: 650 Q43 V37
GRE 1: Q157 V158
GPA: 2.66
Send PM
Re: Although the number of large artificial satellites orbiting the Earth [#permalink] New post   19 Aug 2017, 17:15
prasannar wrote:
Although the number of large artificial satellites orbiting the Earth is small compared to the number of small pieces of debris in orbit, the large satellites interfere more seriously with telescope observations because of the strong reflections they produce. Because many of those large satellites have ceased to function, the proposal has recently been made to eliminate interference from nonfunctioning satellites by exploding them in space.
This proposal, however, is ill conceived, since _______.

A. many nonfunctioning satellites remain in orbit for years
B. for satellites that have ceased to function, repairing them while they are in orbit would be prohibitively expensive
C. there are no known previous instances of satellites’ having been exploded on purpose
D. the only way to make telescope observations without any interference from debris in orbit is to use telescopes launched into extremely high orbits around the Earth
E. a greatly increased number of small particles in Earth’s orbit would result in a blanket of reflections that would make certain valuable telescope observations impossible


E basically states blowing up these satellites would defeat the purpose of blowing them up because it would just make telescope observations harder- don't swat a fly on your face with a butcher's knife
avatar
B
JAIN09
Intern
Intern
Joined: 18 Feb 2017
Posts: 44
Own Kudos [?]: 8 [0]
Given Kudos: 509
Location: India
Schools: ISB '20 IIMA PGPX"20 IIMC PGPEX"20
GMAT 1: 650 Q45 V30
GPA: 3.35
Send PM
Re: Although the number of large artificial satellites orbiting the Earth [#permalink] New post   05 Apr 2018, 07:17
gmat blows wrote:
prasannar wrote:
Although the number of large artificial satellites orbiting the Earth is small compared to
the number of small pieces of debris in orbit, the large satellites interfere more seriously
with telescope observations because of the strong reflections they produce. Because
many of those large satellites have ceased to function, the proposal has recently been
made to eliminate interference from nonfunctioning satellites by exploding them in space.
This proposal, however, is ill conceived, since _______.
A. many nonfunctioning satellites remain in orbit for years
B. for satellites that have ceased to function, repairing them while they are in orbit
would be prohibitively expensive
C. there are no known previous instances of satellites’ having been exploded on
purpose
D. the only way to make telescope observations without any interference from debris
in orbit is to use telescopes launched into extremely high orbits around the Earth
E. a greatly increased number of small particles in Earth’s orbit would result in a
blanket of reflections that would make certain valuable telescope observations
impossible


I was stuck between D and E but chose D.

For E to work, we have to assume that exploding them will indeed increase number of small particles IN THE ORBIT that interferes with the telescope observations (what if exploding it allows the particles to be shoot out so far out into space that it may increase the number of small particles but is now in an orbit that wont interfere with the telescope observations so it doesnt matter that the number increased)
where as with D, we can try to modify all the other factors (i.e. remove debris or explode large satellites) but if the problem remains with the telescope itself, doing all of that is not going to make a difference.



option D:may be true.but it does not address the plan/conclusion that exploding non functional satellite will decrease the interference
avatar
B
manishk30
Intern
Intern
Joined: 10 Jul 2016
Posts: 32
Own Kudos [?]: 17 [0]
Given Kudos: 34
Send PM
Re: Although the number of large artificial satellites orbiting the Earth [#permalink] New post   15 Jun 2018, 23:29
gmat blows wrote:
prasannar wrote:
Although the number of large artificial satellites orbiting the Earth is small compared to
the number of small pieces of debris in orbit, the large satellites interfere more seriously
with telescope observations because of the strong reflections they produce. Because
many of those large satellites have ceased to function, the proposal has recently been
made to eliminate interference from nonfunctioning satellites by exploding them in space.
This proposal, however, is ill conceived, since _______.
A. many nonfunctioning satellites remain in orbit for years
B. for satellites that have ceased to function, repairing them while they are in orbit
would be prohibitively expensive
C. there are no known previous instances of satellites’ having been exploded on
purpose
D. the only way to make telescope observations without any interference from debris
in orbit is to use telescopes launched into extremely high orbits around the Earth
E. a greatly increased number of small particles in Earth’s orbit would result in a
blanket of reflections that would make certain valuable telescope observations
impossible


I was stuck between D and E but chose D.

For E to work, we have to assume that exploding them will indeed increase number of small particles IN THE ORBIT that interferes with the telescope observations (what if exploding it allows the particles to be shoot out so far out into space that it may increase the number of small particles but is now in an orbit that wont interfere with the telescope observations so it doesnt matter that the number increased)
where as with D, we can try to modify all the other factors (i.e. remove debris or explode large satellites) but if the problem remains with the telescope itself, doing all of that is not going to make a difference.




That is why you should remember the conclusion always. Conclusion is the idea of explosion is ill conceived. We have to provide the reason of why it is so. Option D does not say anything about why we should not explode the useless satellites.
avatar
S
HimanshuW11
Manager
Manager
Joined: 14 Jul 2014
Posts: 62
Own Kudos [?]: 107 [1]
Given Kudos: 71
Location: India
Concentration: Social Entrepreneurship, Strategy
GMAT 1: 620 Q41 V34
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: Although the number of large artificial satellites orbiting the Earth [#permalink] New post   04 Sep 2018, 11:23
1
Kudos
Quote:
Although the number of large artificial satellites orbiting the Earth is small compared to the number of small pieces of debris in orbit, the large satellites interfere more seriously with telescope observations because of the strong reflections they produce. Because many of those large satellites have ceased to function, the proposal has recently been made to eliminate interference from nonfunctioning satellites by exploding them in space. This proposal, however, is ill conceived, since _______.

Argument Analysis:
Premises: Although the number of large artificial satellites orbiting the Earth is small compared to the number of small pieces of debris in orbit, the large satellites interfere more seriously with telescope observations because of the strong reflections they produce.
2. Because many of those large satellites have ceased to function,
Conclusion: the proposal has recently been made to eliminate interference from nonfunctioning satellites by exploding them in space.
How do I know, what to do in the fill in the blank: This proposal, however, is ill conceived, since _______
Which clearly shows that we need to weaken the proposal/conclusion

(A) many nonfunctioning satellites remain in orbit for years

(B) for satellites that have ceased to function, repairing them while they are in orbit would be prohibitively expensive

(C) there are no known previous instances of satellites’ having been exploded on purpose

(D) the only way to make telescope observations without any interference from debris in orbit is to use telescopes launched into extremely high orbits around the Earth

Quote:
(E) a greatly increased number of small particles in Earth’s orbit would result in a blanket of reflections that would make certain valuable telescope observations impossible

Only option that does what's required. Observation would be impossible if the number of small particles in earth's orbit increase, then we have no reason to explode the useless satellites as exploding would convert them into the small particles.
User avatar
G
CEdward
VP
VP
Joined: 11 Aug 2020
Posts: 1262
Own Kudos [?]: 201 [0]
Given Kudos: 332
Send PM
Re: Although the number of large artificial satellites orbiting the Earth [#permalink] New post   03 Feb 2021, 20:21
Which of the following most logically completes the argument below?

Although the number of large artificial satellites orbiting the Earth is small compared to the number of small pieces of debris in orbit, the large satellites interfere more seriously with telescope observations because of the strong reflections they produce. Because many of those large satellites have ceased to function, the proposal has recently been made to eliminate interference from nonfunctioning satellites by exploding them in space. This proposal, however, is ill conceived, since _______.

(A) many nonfunctioning satellites remain in orbit for years X
What we are looking for is a reason why it would be a bad idea to explode the non-functioning satellites. Knowing that nonfunctioning satellites remain in orbit for years is not a reason at all.

(B) for satellites that have ceased to function, repairing them while they are in orbit would be prohibitively expensive X
This could arguably give us more reason to explode them in space, but that’s not the direction we want to go in

(C) there are no known previous instances of satellites’ having been exploded on purpose X
Well why not now? The fact that hasn’t happened in the past is not (at least for this argument) a strong support for why it shouldn’t happen now

(D) the only way to make telescope observations without any interference from debris in orbit is to use telescopes launched into extremely high orbits around the Earth
Does not serve as the reason we need.

(E) a greatly increased number of small particles in Earth’s orbit would result in a blanket of reflections that would make certain valuable telescope observations impossible
Correct – there goes the observations…the whole point is to be able to make such observations…blowing up the satellites would just compound the problem
User avatar
VerbalBot
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17220
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Although the number of large artificial satellites orbiting the Earth [#permalink] New post   10 Sep 2023, 11:26
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
gmatclubot
Re: Although the number of large artificial satellites orbiting the Earth [#permalink]
10 Sep 2023, 11:26
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
mysterymanrog
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne
Main navigation
GMAT Resources
Partners
MBA Resources
www.gmac.com|www.mba.com | | GMAT Club Rules | Terms and Conditions