Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 04:33 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 04:33

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 12 Jul 2006
Posts: 6
Own Kudos [?]: 154 [154]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92901
Own Kudos [?]: 618704 [53]
Given Kudos: 81586
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 26 Jan 2008
Posts: 160
Own Kudos [?]: 253 [46]
Given Kudos: 16
Send PM
General Discussion
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 09 Oct 2008
Posts: 48
Own Kudos [?]: 64 [1]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Simple but still having trouble :( [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
I am not sure but i tried in following way:

150+ 40 =190 is divistible by 60 ..no..
150+ 60 =210 is divistible by 60 ..no..
150+ 80 =230 is divistible by 60 ..no..
150+ 90 =240 is divistible by 60 ..YES..
150+ 100 =250 is divistible by 60 ..no..


why division by 60? (10-40 =60%)

what is OA?

Thanks
Director
Director
Joined: 14 Jul 2010
Status:No dream is too large, no dreamer is too small
Posts: 972
Own Kudos [?]: 4927 [4]
Given Kudos: 690
Concentration: Accounting
Send PM
Re: Simple but still having trouble :( [#permalink]
2
Kudos
2
Bookmarks
x-0.40=150
x=250
gross profit 250-150=100.
Alum
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 4341
Own Kudos [?]: 51447 [2]
Given Kudos: 2326
Location: United States (WA)
Concentration: Leadership, General Management
Schools: Ross '20 (M)
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GMAT 2: 740 Q49 V42 (Online)
GMAT 3: 760 Q50 V42 (Online)
GPA: 3.8
WE:Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
Send PM
Re: Problem Solving [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
let my selling price be 100x
then according to the prompt
150+40x=100x
this means 100x=SP=250
So profit is 100
Option E is correct
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 22 Jun 2012
Posts: 43
Own Kudos [?]: 31 [5]
Given Kudos: 6
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V40
Send PM
Re: Problem Solving [#permalink]
4
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Here's how I did it mentally:
the markup is 40% of the total price, the cost of 150 is 60 percent of the cost
hence the markup is two thirds of 150 = 50*2 =100

That's probably more like a 600-700 question I think

Hope it helps
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 28 Sep 2011
Posts: 47
Own Kudos [?]: 85 [2]
Given Kudos: 10
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 520 Q34 V27
GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V38
GPA: 3.01
WE:Information Technology (Commercial Banking)
Send PM
Re: A furniture dealer purchased a desk for $150 and then set [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Selling Price = S

S = 150 + .40S

S = 250

Profit = 250 - 150 = 100
Re: A furniture dealer purchased a desk for $150 and then set th [#permalink]
1
Kudos
hi all.

I love math but hate GMAT math.
Anyway, I'm getting confused with the terminology in this question. If the markup is 40% is that not the same thing as the profit? ie. isn't the markup the difference between the selling price and the cost?

I might be missing something basic here. With this thinking, I just had selling price = to 140% of cost and got the answer wrong. I've seen how people solve it but I just don't understand the business or visual part of it.... HELP!

PS - Why am I asking these types of questions 2 weeks before my exam :(
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14817
Own Kudos [?]: 64890 [10]
Given Kudos: 426
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
A furniture dealer purchased a desk for $150 and then set th [#permalink]
6
Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
angelfire213 wrote:
hi all.

I love math but hate GMAT math.
Anyway, I'm getting confused with the terminology in this question. If the markup is 40% is that not the same thing as the profit? ie. isn't the markup the difference between the selling price and the cost?

I might be missing something basic here. With this thinking, I just had selling price = to 140% of cost and got the answer wrong. I've seen how people solve it but I just don't understand the business or visual part of it.... HELP!

PS - Why am I asking these types of questions 2 weeks before my exam :(


No, mark up is the difference between cost price and list price (or tag price or marked price). The list price may be different from selling price if the store offers a discount.

Look at it from the store's perspective. It buys a shirt at $100 and marks it up by 50% i.e. writes $150 as the list price on the shirt. The shirt doesn't sell for a month after which the store has a sale of 10% on everything. Someone buys the shirt during the sale at this 10% discount i.e. 150 - 10% of 150 = $135. So the selling price of the shirt is $135. So here, mark up was 50% but profit was 35%.

Anyway, in this question, there is no discount but the mark up is given as 40% of the selling price. So it is not 40% of $150 but instead, 40% of Selling price which is obtained by adding mark up to $150.

So if selling price is S,
150 + 40% of S = S
S = 250

Profit = 100 which is calculated on cost price in % terms. So 100/150 * 100 = 66.67% is profit.
Note that usually mark up is also calculated on cost price and hence mark up percentage would be 100/150 = 66.7% - i.e. same as profit% since there is no discount in this case. This question just gives you mark up on selling price and hence you need to do suitable modifications.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 09 Jan 2014
Posts: 5
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [1]
Given Kudos: 12
Send PM
Re: A furniture dealer purchased a desk for $150 and then set th [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
angelfire213 wrote:
hi all.

I love math but hate GMAT math.
Anyway, I'm getting confused with the terminology in this question. If the markup is 40% is that not the same thing as the profit? ie. isn't the markup the difference between the selling price and the cost?

I might be missing something basic here. With this thinking, I just had selling price = to 140% of cost and got the answer wrong. I've seen how people solve it but I just don't understand the business or visual part of it.... HELP!

PS - Why am I asking these types of questions 2 weeks before my exam :(


No, mark up is the difference between cost price and list price (or tag price or marked price). The list price may be different from selling price if the store offers a discount.

Look at it from the store's perspective. It buys a shirt at $100 and marks it up by 50% i.e. writes $150 as the list price on the shirt. The shirt doesn't sell for a month after which the store has a sale of 10% on everything. Someone buys the shirt during the sale at this 10% discount i.e. 150 - 10% of 150 = $135. So the selling price of the shirt is $135. So here, mark up was 50% but profit was 35%.

Anyway, in this question, there is no discount but the mark up is given as 40% of the selling price. So it is not 40% of $150 but instead, 40% of Selling price which is obtained by adding mark up to $150.

So if selling price is S,
150 + 40% of S = S
S = 250

Profit = 100 which is calculated on cost price in % terms. So 100/150 * 100 = 66.67% is profit.
Note that usually mark up is also calculated on cost price and hence mark up percentage would be 100/150 = 66.7% - i.e. same as profit% since there is no discount in this case. This question just gives you mark up on selling price and hence you need to do suitable modifications.


wow, thanks for the explanation on the list price bit. i guess that was the missing link, i too was having a hard time trying to understand why there's a gap in the understanding. the list price part fill in the void nicely!
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 28 Jun 2015
Posts: 250
Own Kudos [?]: 293 [1]
Given Kudos: 47
Concentration: Finance
GPA: 3.5
Send PM
Re: A furniture dealer purchased a desk for $150 and then set th [#permalink]
1
Kudos
CP = $150.
SP = $150 + 40%(SP)

So, (0.6) (SP) = $150

SP = $150/0.6 = $250.

So, GP = SP-CP = $250-$150 = $100. Ans (E).
Manager
Manager
Joined: 23 Feb 2015
Posts: 161
Own Kudos [?]: 107 [0]
Given Kudos: 5
Schools: Duke '19 (M)
Send PM
Re: A furniture dealer purchased a desk for $150 and then set th [#permalink]
Purchase price = $150
Selling Price = SP

SP = 150 + 0.4SP
0.6SP = 150
SP = 250

GP = 250-150

GP = $100

Answer: E
Board of Directors
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Status:QA & VA Forum Moderator
Posts: 6072
Own Kudos [?]: 4689 [0]
Given Kudos: 463
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
WE:Business Development (Commercial Banking)
Send PM
Re: A furniture dealer purchased a desk for $150 and then set th [#permalink]
Bunuel wrote:
Abhishek009 wrote:
Dondarrion wrote:
Abhishek009,

Can you repost the image? I am getting the red x.

Thanks!


Here you go sir -



Images you post are not visible at all.


Very sorry for the issue :oops: :oops: :oops: , reposting as attachment -
Attachments

Untitled.png
Untitled.png [ 3.71 KiB | Viewed 71223 times ]

Intern
Intern
Joined: 14 Jul 2016
Posts: 38
Own Kudos [?]: 38 [0]
Given Kudos: 17
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
Schools: AGSM '20 (A)
GMAT 1: 650 Q48 V31
GPA: 3.5
WE:Analyst (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: A furniture dealer purchased a desk for $150 and then set th [#permalink]
udribat wrote:
A furniture dealer purchased a desk for $150 and then set the selling price equal to the purchase price plus a markup that was 40% of the selling price. If the dealer sold the desk at the selling price, what was the amount of the dealer's gross profit from the purchase and the sale of the desk?

A. $40
B. $60
C. $80
D. $90
E. $100

PP + 40%SP = SP
PP + 4/10 * SP = SP
6SP = 1500
SP =25o
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Dec 2015
Posts: 258
Own Kudos [?]: 117 [0]
Given Kudos: 36
GMAT 1: 600 Q44 V27
Send PM
I am getting crazy with this. please help... [#permalink]
A furniture dealer purchased a desk for $150 and then set the selling price equal to the purchase price plus a markup that was 40% of the selling price. If the dealer sold the desk at the selling price, what was the amount of the dealer's gross profit from the purchase and the sale of the desk?

A. $40
B. $60
C. $80
D. $90
E. $100

my solution:

\(150(1+\frac{x}{100})=S\) S is selling price. X is the markup.

also \(x=\frac{4}{10}S\)

substitute: \(150(1+\frac{4s}{10/100})=S\)
\(150+\frac{6s}{10}=S\)
\(1500+6S=10S\)

Selling price = 375.

WHY is this wrong????? The logic seems perfect, yet its wrong, omg what is going on here.....
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 04 Dec 2015
Posts: 935
Own Kudos [?]: 1541 [2]
Given Kudos: 115
GMAT 1: 790 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: A furniture dealer purchased a desk for $150 and then set th [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
iliavko wrote:
A furniture dealer purchased a desk for $150 and then set the selling price equal to the purchase price plus a markup that was 40% of the selling price. If the dealer sold the desk at the selling price, what was the amount of the dealer's gross profit from the purchase and the sale of the desk?

A. $40
B. $60
C. $80
D. $90
E. $100

my solution:

\(150(1+\frac{x}{100})=S\) S is selling price. X is the markup.

also \(x=\frac{4}{10}S\)

substitute: \(150(1+\frac{4s}{10/100})=S\)
\(150+\frac{6s}{10}=S\)
\(1500+6S=10S\)

Selling price = 375.

WHY is this wrong????? The logic seems perfect, yet its wrong, omg what is going on here.....


Your solution would be correct if the 'markup' were given as a percentage markup (i.e. if it said something like 'a markup of 40%' or 'a 40% markup'.) However, in this problem, you're given the dollar amount of the markup. Sure, they describe it to you in terms of percents, but '40 percent of the selling price' refers to a dollar amount, not a percentage value. In your equation, you're dividing it by 100, which indicates that you thought of it as a percentage markup.

What you actually want to start with is:

selling price = 150 + 4/10(selling price)

That is, the selling price starts at 150, and then is increased by a dollar amount equal to 40 percent of the selling price.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 24 Sep 2016
Posts: 28
Own Kudos [?]: 26 [0]
Given Kudos: 81
Location: United States (CT)
Concentration: Finance, International Business
GPA: 3.81
WE:Analyst (Venture Capital)
Send PM
Re: A furniture dealer purchased a desk for $150 and then set th [#permalink]
Very simple to understand forget about the algebra it will only confuse you. The desk cost !50 dollars, and the dealer wanted to set the selling price equal to an an amount. Now that amount included a markup that was 40% of the selling price. So 40% of 150 is 60 however he needs to make a profit. So he has to increase the price to a higher amount to obtain the 40% markup. In this case the markup would be $90 dollars so the dealer must raise the price to a certain amount in this case to $240 because 60% of the original 150 cost would add the amount equivalent to the markup and gross profit!
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 25 Dec 2017
Posts: 4
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: A furniture dealer purchased a desk for $150 and then set th [#permalink]
Here is how I do it.
Selling Price = S

S = 150 + .40S

S = 250

Profit = 250 - 150 = 100

I hope it's right.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Posts: 6821
Own Kudos [?]: 29902 [0]
Given Kudos: 799
Location: Canada
Send PM
Re: A furniture dealer purchased a desk for $150 and then set th [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Top Contributor
udribat wrote:
A furniture dealer purchased a desk for $150 and then set the selling price equal to the purchase price plus a markup that was 40% of the selling price. If the dealer sold the desk at the selling price, what was the amount of the dealer's gross profit from the purchase and the sale of the desk?

A. $40
B. $60
C. $80
D. $90
E. $100


Let S = the selling price

The dealer ... set the selling price equal to purchasing price ($150) plus a markup that was 40% of selling price.
So, the markup = 0.4S
In other words: S = 150 + 0.4S
Subtract 0.4S from both sides to get: 0.6S = 150
Solve: S = 250
In other words, the selling price was $250

What was the dealer's gross profit from the purchase and the sale of the desk?
The profit = $250 - $150 = $100

Answer: E

Cheers,
Brent
GMAT Club Bot
Re: A furniture dealer purchased a desk for $150 and then set th [#permalink]
 1   2   
Moderators:
Math Expert
92901 posts
Senior Moderator - Masters Forum
3137 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne