Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 00:49 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 00:49

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 25 Jan 2010
Posts: 91
Own Kudos [?]: 622 [18]
Given Kudos: 40
Location: Calicut, India
Concentration: Finance
Send PM
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 30 Sep 2010
Posts: 36
Own Kudos [?]: 158 [3]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 03 Jun 2010
Posts: 98
Own Kudos [?]: 508 [0]
Given Kudos: 40
Location: United States (MI)
Concentration: Marketing, General Management
WE:Business Development (Consumer Products)
Send PM
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 02 Sep 2010
Posts: 615
Own Kudos [?]: 2929 [11]
Given Kudos: 25
Location: London
 Q51  V41
Send PM
Re: P works 25% more efficiently than Q and Q works 50% more eff [#permalink]
10
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
cleetus wrote:
P works 25% more efficiently than Q and Q works 50% more efficiently than R. To complete a certain project, P alone takes 50 days less than Q alone. If, in this project P alone works for 60 days and then Q alone works for 125 days, in how many days can R alone complete the remaining work?
A) 50 days
B) 75 days
C) 100 days
D) 150 days
E) 80 days


P works 25% more efficiently than Q : Something that takes Q 5 days, takes P 4 days
Q works 50% more efficiently than R : Something that takes R 7.5 days, takes Q 5 days

P alone takes 50 days less than Q : For every 4 days P works, Q has to work an extra day. Hence P alone can do it in 200 days and Q alone in 250 days and hence R alone in 375 days

P works for 60 days --> 60/200 work done => 30%
Q works for 125 days --> 125/250 work done => 50%
20% work left ... R alone will take 20% * 375 = 75 days

Answer is (B)
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 24 Feb 2011
Posts: 23
Own Kudos [?]: 120 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Send PM
Re: P works 25% more efficiently than Q and Q works 50% more eff [#permalink]
I don't understand the explanation.
"P is 25% more efficient..hence he will take 100/125 * time taken by Q"
why is the rate 100/125?
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 25 Jan 2010
Posts: 91
Own Kudos [?]: 622 [2]
Given Kudos: 40
Location: Calicut, India
Concentration: Finance
Send PM
Re: P works 25% more efficiently than Q and Q works 50% more eff [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
olivite wrote:
I don't understand the explanation.
"P is 25% more efficient..hence he will take 100/125 * time taken by Q"
why is the rate 100/125?


Rate and time is inversely proportional.
Question says P is 25% more efficient than Q. This means P is 5/4 of Q's rate.
Work rate of P is 5/4 of Q.
Since time is inversely proportional to workrate,Time by P is 4/5 of time taken by Q=100/125 of Time taken by Q.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 13 Nov 2011
Status:Princess of Economics
Posts: 5
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: Canada
Concentration: Economics
Send PM
Re: P works 25% more efficiently than Q and Q works 50% more eff [#permalink]
ulm wrote:
How to solve it under 2 min?
It took me about 7 mins, because of calculations :( ...

It's a question from a math book. I don't think you should worry too much about it.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 25 Jan 2010
Posts: 91
Own Kudos [?]: 622 [0]
Given Kudos: 40
Location: Calicut, India
Concentration: Finance
Send PM
Re: P works 25% more efficiently than Q and Q works 50% more eff [#permalink]
MariaBez wrote:
ulm wrote:
How to solve it under 2 min?
It took me about 7 mins, because of calculations :( ...

It's a question from a math book. I don't think you should worry too much about it.

True MariaBez, its a question from Indian Study material. But similar question that demands same approach can be seen in real GMAT.
Iits always better to know the approach. This can be solved easily in 1.25 mins if u are good in multiplication and division. wat takes u more time is the approach. do more practice questions and once u ace the approach and techniques, u are through.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 13 Nov 2011
Status:Princess of Economics
Posts: 5
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: Canada
Concentration: Economics
Send PM
Re: P works 25% more efficiently than Q and Q works 50% more eff [#permalink]
Cleetus, good point! I decided to return to this question and try to solve it one more time. You're absolutely right. The more you practice, the quicker you will come up with solutions on real gmat.
Thank you!!
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 25 Jan 2010
Posts: 91
Own Kudos [?]: 622 [0]
Given Kudos: 40
Location: Calicut, India
Concentration: Finance
Send PM
Re: P works 25% more efficiently than Q and Q works 50% more eff [#permalink]
MariaBez wrote:
Cleetus, good point! I decided to return to this question and try to solve it one more time. You're absolutely right. The more you practice, the quicker you will come up with solutions on real gmat.
Thank you!!


Good to know that.
Most of the questions posted in here are really worth solving and the solution explained here by GMAT Wizards here gives u different approach to a single question. Also do come up with as many good questions u can and see how those questions are dealt by many club members.

I have posted only selected questions which really need different approach that could help u in real GMAT.

Cleetus
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 12 Oct 2011
Posts: 114
Own Kudos [?]: 171 [0]
Given Kudos: 110
Send PM
Re: P works 25% more efficiently than Q and Q works 50% more eff [#permalink]
Nice question. Yea the calculations take up a lot of time but the efficiency will increase with practice I guess. The concept of increased efficiency and the inverse relationship between time and work rate confused me.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 26 Feb 2012
Posts: 79
Own Kudos [?]: 109 [0]
Given Kudos: 56
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Finance
WE:Engineering (Telecommunications)
Send PM
Re: P works 25% more efficiently than Q and Q works 50% more eff [#permalink]
Hi shrouded1

Please explain the following part of your explanation

P alone takes 50 days less than Q : For every 4 days P works, Q has to work an extra day. Hence P alone can do it in 200 days and Q alone in 250 days and hence R alone in 375 days

Rgds
Prasannajeet
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 13 May 2013
Posts: 314
Own Kudos [?]: 565 [1]
Given Kudos: 134
Send PM
Re: P works 25% more efficiently than Q and Q works 50% more eff [#permalink]
1
Kudos
P works 25% more efficiently than Q and Q works 50% more efficiently than R. To complete a certain project, P alone takes 50 days less than Q alone. If, in this project P alone works for 60 days and then Q alone works for 125 days, in how many days can R alone complete the remaining work?

I am lost...start to finish I am totally lost. Could someone help me out on this? I have been staring at it for 30 minutes to no avail!!!
MBA Section Director
Joined: 22 Feb 2012
Affiliations: GMAT Club
Posts: 8701
Own Kudos [?]: 10010 [1]
Given Kudos: 4542
Test: Test
Send PM
Re: P works 25% more efficiently than Q and Q works 50% more eff [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
WholeLottaLove wrote:
P works 25% more efficiently than Q and Q works 50% more efficiently than R. To complete a certain project, P alone takes 50 days less than Q alone. If, in this project P alone works for 60 days and then Q alone works for 125 days, in how many days can R alone complete the remaining work?

I am lost...start to finish I am totally lost. Could someone help me out on this? I have been staring at it for 30 minutes to no avail!!!


Don't bother buddy, This problem is perhaps from Indian CAT or XAT. I have never seen such problems in GMAT quant - There is lot of calculation involved.

However, for the curiosity, below is the solution.

Statement 1 :- P works 25% more efficiently than Q ---------> P takes 20 % less time than Q takes.
Statement 2 :- Q works 50% more efficiently than R ---------> Q takes 33.33% less time than R Takes.

Note 1 :- These are standard ratios and need to remember.
For Reference :-
If A is 10% greater than B, then B is 9.09% lesser than A
If A is 15% greater than B, then B is 13% lesser than A
If A is 20% greater than B, then B is 16.67% lesser than A
If A is 25% greater than B, then B is 20% lesser than A
If A is 30% greater than B, then B is 23% lesser than A
If A is 40% greater than B, then B is 28% lesser than A
If A is 50% greater than B, then B is 33.33% lesser than A
If A is 60% greater than B, then B is 37.50% lesser than A

Note 2 :- These are extremely useful in Time, Speed, and Distance. e.g. If you increase the speed by 10%, then time will be reduced by 9.09% (When the distance is constant)

Back to the Question........

let's Assume that R takes 100% time, So Q will take 66.67% time, and P will take 53.35% time.

Statement 3 :- P alone takes 50 days less than Q alone. ---------> We already know that Q's time is 66.67% and P's time is 53.35%, So P is taking (66.67 - 53.35) = 13.35 less time, which is equivalent to 50 days.

So if 13.35% time is equivalent to 50 days then 100% time (Which is R's) will be equivalent to 374 days -----------------------------{This can be derived using Unitary Method.

Remember this as if 13.35% belongs to 50 then 100% belongs to what? In equation it will be \(\frac{50}{13.35%} \frac{100}{?}\) -------- Direct multiplication will give the answer as 374 days.}

So We have the following
R takes 374 days to finish work alone.
Q takes 250 days to finish work alone.
P takes 200 days to finish work alone.

Now we can derive that
R finishes \(\frac{100}{374} = 0.26%\) work in a day working alone. ------[ We know, Total work always equals 100%]
Q finishes \(\frac{100}{250} = 0.40%\) work in a day working alone. ------[ We know, Total work always equals 100%]
P finishes \(\frac{100}{200} = 0.50%\) work in a day working alone. ------[ We know, Total work always equals 100%]

Statement 4 :- If, in this project P alone works for 60 days
P is completing 0.50% work in a day and he worked for 60 days, So he must have completed 30% of the work.

Statement 5 :- and then Q alone works for 125 days,
Q is completing 0.40% work in a day and he worked for 125 days, So he must have completed 50% of the work.

Now P and Q completed 50 + 30 = 80% work and we are left with only 20% work, which is to be completed by R

Question :- in how many days can R alone complete the remaining work? -------> \(\frac{20%}{0.26%} = 75 days\) approximately. Choice B

Hope That Helps. :)
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 10 Jul 2013
Posts: 229
Own Kudos [?]: 1036 [1]
Given Kudos: 102
Send PM
Re: P works 25% more efficiently than Q and Q works 50% more eff [#permalink]
1
Kudos
WholeLottaLove wrote:
P works 25% more efficiently than Q and Q works 50% more efficiently than R. To complete a certain project, P alone takes 50 days less than Q alone. If, in this project P alone works for 60 days and then Q alone works for 125 days, in how many days can R alone complete the remaining work?

I am lost...start to finish I am totally lost. Could someone help me out on this? I have been staring at it for 30 minutes to no avail!!!



solution:
Ratio of efficiency, P:Q:R = (125/100) × 150 : 150 : 100
Or, P:Q:R = 15:12:8

The more you effective the less time you need to work.
So working days is just reverse of the efficiency.

Here, For number of days, P:Q = 12:15 = 4:5 =8:10
And, Q:R= 8:12 = 2:3 = 10:15
So the ratio of working days for P:Q:R = 8:10:15

We can imagine now that to do 1 work P and Q need respectively 8x and 10x days.

According to the question, 10x – 8x = 50
Or, x = 25 days

Finally, the ratio of working days for 1 full work , P:Q:R = 8x:10x:15x
Or, 8 × 25 : 10 × 25 : 15 × 25
Or, 200 : 250 : 375

P can do in 60days = 60/200 = 3/10 part of work
Q can do in 125days = 125/250 = ½ part of work

So, P and Q did = 3/10 + ½ = 4/5 parts of work
Remaining = 1 – 4/5 = 1/5 part of works have to be done by R .

R can do 1 work in 375 days
So R can do 1/5 part of work = 1/5 × 375 = 75 days (Answer)
…………….

I elaborate all the things I did just to make it clear, but the problem is not so huge.
Just do these parts:
1. Evaluate efficiency ratio
2. Convert it by reversing into time ratio
3. Use the 50days information with the ratio
4. Then you can use normal work and rate formulas ,which I elaborately did here.
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Posts: 587
Own Kudos [?]: 3155 [1]
Given Kudos: 322
Concentration: General Management, General Management
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.7
WE:Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Send PM
Re: P works 25% more efficiently than Q and Q works 50% more eff [#permalink]
1
Kudos
P = (15/8R)
Q= (3/2R)
R= 1/R ...............These are the rates of work given in the stimulus

let Q takes 't' days to complete a work
Hence, P takes 't-50'

(15/8R) * (t-50) = (3/2R) * t

=> t=250 days

Total work required is = (15/8R) * (250-50) = 375/R

P completes work = 375/2R in 60 days
Q completes work = 225/2R in 125 days

Hence R will complete

375/R - [275/2R + 375/2R]

Hence 75
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 12 Sep 2013
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: [0]
Given Kudos: 42
Send PM
Re: P works 25% more efficiently than Q and Q works 50% more eff [#permalink]
TGC: IT seemed you swap the work for P and Q

Total work required is = (15/8R) * (250-50) = 375/R

P completes work = (15/8R)*60=225/2R in 60 days
Q completes work = (3/2R)*125=375/2R in 125 days

Hence R will complete

375/R - [275/2R + 375/2R]

Hence 75
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 32637
Own Kudos [?]: 821 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: P works 25% more efficiently than Q and Q works 50% more eff [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Problem Solving (PS) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
GMAT Club Bot
Re: P works 25% more efficiently than Q and Q works 50% more eff [#permalink]
Moderators:
Math Expert
92888 posts
Senior Moderator - Masters Forum
3137 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne