Last visit was: 23 Apr 2024, 19:16 It is currently 23 Apr 2024, 19:16

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 07 Nov 2009
Posts: 187
Own Kudos [?]: 2803 [737]
Given Kudos: 20
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92883
Own Kudos [?]: 618607 [346]
Given Kudos: 81563
Send PM
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14816
Own Kudos [?]: 64883 [112]
Given Kudos: 426
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 1114
Own Kudos [?]: 4702 [43]
Given Kudos: 376
Send PM
Re: Train A leaves New York for Boston at 3 PM and travels at [#permalink]
32
Kudos
11
Bookmarks
Phew!!! Difficult one for me; took me more than 3 minutes just to formulate the equation and more than 3 minutes to solve and arrive at conclusion.

Sol:
The total time is 2 hours

"A" traveled 100 miles in 1 hour when it met train B, which by then would have traveled 10 mins or 1/6 hours.

Let's take distance traveled by B in 10 minutes or 1/6 hours to be "x" miles. So; train A travels 100 miles + x miles and B travels x miles+ 100 miles

Now; let's just talk about time

A traveled 100 miles in 1 hour
A would have traveled x miles in x/100 hour

B traveled x miles in 1/6 hour
B would have traveled 100 miles in 100/(6x) hour

Total time combined is 2; Thus;

1+ x/100 + 1/6 + 100/(6x) = 2 ---> This is the equation

Solving the above; we get
\(3x^2-100x-150x+5000=0\)
\((x-50)(3x-100)=0\)

x could be 50 miles
or
x could be 100/3 miles approx 33 miles

1.
It says B arrived at NY before A arrived at Boston.

Say x=50
B spent 10 minutes to travel x miles or 50 miles
B will spend 20 minutes to travel remaining 100 miles

A spent x/100 hour to travel x miles means; 1/2 hour

As we can see after A and B met; B traveled 20 minutes and A 30 minutes.
This satisfies the statement 1 for x=50

Let's check x=33 as well
B spent 10 minutes to travel x miles or 33 miles
B will spend approx 30 minutes to travel 3 times the distance (100=3*33), which is remaining 100 miles.

A spent x/100 hour to travel x miles means; 33/100 hour approx 1/3 hours; 20 minutes approx

As we can see after A and B met; B traveled 30 minutes and A 20 minutes.
This will make statement 1 false. Thus x can't be 33.

We found unique solution for x=50.
Thus we know; train B arrived New York 30 minutes after it started. i.e. at 4:20PM

Sufficient.

2.
This one is easy;
It says the distance > 140 miles
if x=33
Distance = 100+x = 133 <140
x=33 can't be true

if x=50
Distance = 100+x = 150 >140
x=50 is true

Sufficient.

Ans: "D"
General Discussion
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 07 Nov 2009
Posts: 187
Own Kudos [?]: 2803 [5]
Given Kudos: 20
Send PM
Re: Train A leaves New York for Boston at 3 PM and travels at [#permalink]
5
Kudos
Nice explanation. Thanks Bunuel!
User avatar
VP
VP
Joined: 02 Jul 2009
Status:mission completed!
Posts: 1139
Own Kudos [?]: 2129 [6]
Given Kudos: 622
GPA: 3.77
Send PM
Re: Train A leaves New York for Boston at 3 PM and travels at [#permalink]
5
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
very good problem,

thank you Bunuel!
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Status:Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Posts: 472
Own Kudos [?]: 892 [4]
Given Kudos: 123
Send PM
Re: Train A leaves New York for Boston at 3 PM and travels at [#permalink]
4
Kudos
Is there a intuitive way to solve this rather than with equations, quadratics. I guesses for a sec that A is very sufficient information. Since only two variables are unknown - distance covered by B before it intersects A and the speed of train B. Two variables and two equations will be fine.

But then I looked at B and suddenly the difficulty jumped up. A or D appear likely. I thought train B is super fast so increasing the distance will make even more likely that train B arrives before A. This is the same as stem 1)

hence I guessed D.

VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
Interesting question. I would like to share my thoughts on it. The first thing I notice is that the statements do not provide any concrete data. I cannot solve anything using them so most probably I will be able to get an answer from the data in the question stem but I will get multiple possible answers. The statements will probably help me choose one of them. (all a speculation based on the statements. The answer may be E) I know a quadratic gives me multiple answers.

Attachment:
Ques2.jpg

The diagram above incorporates the data given in the question stem. Let x be the distance from meeting point to Boston.

Speed of train A = 100 mph
Speed of train B = x/(10 min) = 6x mph (converted min to hr)
Total time taken by both is 2 hrs. Already accounted for is 1hr + (1/6) hr
The remaining (5/6) hrs is the time needed by both together to reach their respective destinations.

Time taken by train A to reach B + time taken by train B to reach NY = 5/6
x/100 + 100/6x = 5/6
3x^2 - 250x + 5000 = 0 (Painful part of the question)
x = 50, 33.33

(1) Train B arrived in New York before Train A arrived in Boston.
If x = 50, time taken by train A to reach B = 1/2 hr, time taken by train B to reach NY = 1/3 hr
If x = 33.33, time taken by train A to reach B = 1/3 hr, time taken by train B to reach NY = 1/2 hr
Since train B arrived first, x must be 50 and B must have arrived at 4:20. Sufficient.

(2) The distance between New York and Boston is greater than 140 miles.
x must be 50 to make total distance more than 140. Time taken by train B must be 1/3 hr and it must have arrived at 4:20. Sufficient.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 03 Oct 2010
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [1]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Train A leaves New York for Boston at 3 PM and travels at [#permalink]
1
Kudos
I have one question to all of you ! Why havent you taken into consideration relative speed concept ????

if you take that the equations will be completely different
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Status:Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Posts: 472
Own Kudos [?]: 892 [2]
Given Kudos: 123
Send PM
Re: Train A leaves New York for Boston at 3 PM and travels at [#permalink]
1
Kudos
This is not true. Well relative speed is not an elixir. Its derivative and based on usual speed distance formula. It niether changes the variables not the relationships between the variables - so equations cant be different.

Am I am missing something?
lastattack wrote:
I have one question to all of you ! Why havent you taken into consideration relative speed concept ????

if you take that the equations will be completely different
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14816
Own Kudos [?]: 64883 [1]
Given Kudos: 426
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
Re: Train A leaves New York for Boston at 3 PM and travels at [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
lastattack wrote:
I have one question to all of you ! Why havent you taken into consideration relative speed concept ????

if you take that the equations will be completely different


Relative speed concept has its uses. This question is not one of them. We use it when 2 people cover some distance together in the same time... Here we already know that they meet at 4:00 when A has traveled 100 miles. After that we know that they take a total of 50 mins to reach their respective destinations independently.

Give the equations you have in mind... we can tell you what works and what doesn't and why...
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 27 Feb 2011
Posts: 22
Own Kudos [?]: 9 [1]
Given Kudos: 9
Send PM
Re: Train A leaves New York for Boston at 3 PM and travels at [#permalink]
1
Kudos
folks one thing.. wht are the chances that this might turn up in the real GMAT? chances of solving this in less than 2 mins are next to none..
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14816
Own Kudos [?]: 64883 [1]
Given Kudos: 426
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
Train A leaves New York for Boston at 3 PM and travels at [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
gmat1220 wrote:
This is not true. Well relative speed is not an elixir. Its derivative and based on usual speed distance formula. It niether changes the variables not the relationships between the variables - so equations cant be different.

Am I am missing something?


That's right. Relative speed is just speed of one relative to the other... It doesn't matter from whose perspective you see, the answer would never be different. It does not change the relation between the variables.

Check this video for when to use relative speed: https://youtu.be/wrYxeZ2WsEM

Originally posted by KarishmaB on 07 Mar 2011, 19:40.
Last edited by KarishmaB on 14 Aug 2023, 00:00, edited 1 time in total.
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14816
Own Kudos [?]: 64883 [7]
Given Kudos: 426
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
Re: Train A leaves New York for Boston at 3 PM and travels at [#permalink]
6
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
gladvijay wrote:
folks one thing.. wht are the chances that this might turn up in the real GMAT? chances of solving this in less than 2 mins are next to none..


such a question is not unfathomable... it is based on logic and sound interpretation... it is a higher level question for sure but the questions at this level are challenging... I would expect a more straight forward quadratic to save time but otherwise the question is fine... also remember, if you reach a level where you get such a question, you would have solved the really easy ones fairly quickly.. so you would actually have 3-4 mins to invest in such a question which is more than sufficient time... try using diagrams.. they help you grasp the concepts quickly...
Manager
Manager
Joined: 16 May 2011
Posts: 240
Own Kudos [?]: 308 [2]
Given Kudos: 64
Concentration: Finance, Real Estate
GMAT Date: 12-27-2011
WE:Law (Law)
Send PM
Re: Train A leaves New York for Boston at 3 PM and travels at [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
CAN THE STEM STATE SOMTHING ELSE THAN THE STATMENTS?
ACCORDING TO THE STEM: D=130
ACCORDING TO STATMENT B D>140



Let:
be the distance between cities;
be the rate of Train B.

"An hour later (so at 4:00PM), Train A passes Train B" --> before they pass each other A traveled 1 hour (4PM-3PM) and B traveled 1/6 hours (4PM-3:50PM).

"Combined travel time of the two trains is 2 hours" --> d/100(time to cover all distance for train A)+d/x(time to cover all distance for train B)=2 --> ;

As before they pass A traveled 100 miles (1 hour at 100 miles per hour), then distance to cover for B after they pass is this 100 miles and as B traveled x*1/6 miles before they pass (1/6 hour at x miles per hour), then distance to cover for A after they pass is this x*1/6 miles --> ;

So, we have:
and .

Solving for and
and ;
OR:
and .

(1) Says that train B arrived before A.
If A arrives at 4:20, B at 4:30, not good;
If A arrives at 4:30, B at 4:20, OK.
Sufficient

(2) Says that --> --> , arrival time for B 4:20. Sufficient
Manager
Manager
Joined: 16 May 2011
Posts: 240
Own Kudos [?]: 308 [3]
Given Kudos: 64
Concentration: Finance, Real Estate
GMAT Date: 12-27-2011
WE:Law (Law)
Send PM
Re: Train A leaves New York for Boston at 3 PM and travels at [#permalink]
2
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
BUNUEL HAS THE BEST ABILITY TO SIMPLIFY THE HARDEST OF THEM ALL
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 08 May 2009
Status:There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Posts: 552
Own Kudos [?]: 588 [2]
Given Kudos: 10
Send PM
Re: Train A leaves New York for Boston at 3 PM and travels at [#permalink]
2
Kudos
a (d-100)/(1/6) > 100
Speed b > speed a

d > 116.
so taking d = 117 there will be fixed time for B to cover the distance considering
ta+tb = 2hrs.

SUfficient.

b essentially gives the same d>140 and ta+tb = 2 will give a fixed value for tb.

Thus D it is.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 12 Oct 2011
Posts: 114
Own Kudos [?]: 171 [1]
Given Kudos: 110
Send PM
Re: Train A leaves New York for Boston at 3 PM and travels at [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Clean bowled till I read Bunuel's explanation. I would have guessed and moved on. Quite difficult for me. :(
Bunuel, thanks to you, I am at least able to understand the solutions.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 08 Aug 2013
Posts: 25
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [0]
Given Kudos: 6
Send PM
Re: Train A leaves New York for Boston at 3 PM and travels at [#permalink]
Hi,

Thanks Bunuel.
Can you tell me a quick way to solve the 2 equations for d and x ?

\(\frac{d}{100}+\frac{d}{x}=2\)
\(100+\frac{x}{6}=d\)
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92883
Own Kudos [?]: 618607 [0]
Given Kudos: 81563
Send PM
Re: Train A leaves New York for Boston at 3 PM and travels at [#permalink]
Expert Reply
batman08 wrote:
Hi,

Thanks Bunuel.
Can you tell me a quick way to solve the 2 equations for d and x ?

(i) \(\frac{d}{100}+\frac{d}{x}=2\)

(ii) \(100+\frac{x}{6}=d\)


No super fast way. Just substitute value of d from (ii) in (i) and solve quadratics for x.
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 04 Jan 2014
Posts: 84
Own Kudos [?]: 56 [0]
Given Kudos: 24
Send PM
Re: DS- Time/Distance [#permalink]
Bunuel wrote:
Make it simple:

Let:
\(d\) be the distance between cities;
\(x\) be the rate of Train B.

"An hour later (so at 4:00PM), Train A passes Train B" --> before they pass each other A traveled 1 hour (4PM-3PM) and B traveled 1/6 hours (4PM-3:50PM).

"Combined travel time of the two trains is 2 hours" --> d/100(time to cover all distance for train A)+d/x(time to cover all distance for train B)=2 --> \(\frac{d}{100}+\frac{d}{x}=2\);

As before they pass A traveled 100 miles (1 hour at 100 miles per hour), then distance to cover for B after they pass is this 100 miles and as B traveled x*1/6 miles before they pass (1/6 hour at x miles per hour), then distance to cover for A after they pass is this x*1/6 miles --> \(100+\frac{x}{6}=d\);

So, we have:
\(\frac{d}{100}+\frac{d}{x}=2\) and \(100+\frac{x}{6}=d\).



Hi Bunnel

I don't understand why do we have to add \(100+\frac{x}{6}=d\) ?

Thanks
GMAT Club Bot
Re: DS- Time/Distance [#permalink]
 1   2   3   
Moderator:
Math Expert
92883 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne