Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 19 Apr 2014, 07:29

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

PR test scoring logic..confused

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 22 Nov 2003
Posts: 41
Location: Serbia
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

PR test scoring logic..confused [#permalink] New post 21 Jan 2004, 18:30
I try to understand how PRтАЩs algorithm works, but I donтАЩt get it. :?
I have made 3 mistakes on Quantitative (DS) and IтАШve got 46. The most difficult problem was diff. level of 64.
Next time I got 47 and I made 4 mistakes (3 DS+1 PS). Again the level of difficulty was lower than 64.
Has anyone scored higher than 47-48 on the Quantitative section (Princeton Review CD)тАжor has anyone seen a problem that is more difficult than those of diff.level 64?
Btw. I got V34( and 33) and Totals were 650тАж
Intern
Intern
Joined: 09 Jan 2004
Posts: 31
Location: Virginia
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 22 Jan 2004, 08:47
I would guess their scoring algorithm is similar to the real thing, but what matters more for scoring isn't how many you got wrong but how early in the quant section you got those answers wrong. The earlier questions are weighted more heavily. Harder questions are weighted more heavily too.

That would be my best guess. I wouldn't analyze too much the actual scoring, but focus instead on the questions you're getting wrong and how to improve there. Data Sufficiency seems to be an area to work on for you, so concentrate on that instead of the scoring algorithm. Otherwise it sounds like you're doing very well on the quant!!
Manager
Manager
Joined: 19 Jul 2003
Posts: 63
Location: Florida
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 01 Feb 2004, 21:55
Zeka you're post is right in line. I scored a 49 on my first powerprep math section when I never scored above 44 on Princeton math. I missed 3 questions one time and got a 44. I never understood that.
_________________

Paul

Intern
Intern
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
Posts: 13
Location: San Diego, CA
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

I concur [#permalink] New post 04 Feb 2004, 13:12
I've taken 6 PR tests and my scores have ranged from 620 to 730. The most I've scored on Quant has been 47. On the other hand, I took PP1 and my Quant score was 50!!
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
Posts: 345
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 19 Feb 2004, 04:21
I concur!
  [#permalink] 19 Feb 2004, 04:21
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts PR tests afife76 1 02 Aug 2004, 19:30
New posts PR Tests banerjeea_98 1 25 Apr 2005, 12:50
New posts PR Sample Test cosmicstarr 0 20 Jul 2005, 09:48
New posts PR tests - how do you see the score???? kayser`soze 2 19 Oct 2005, 14:15
New posts PR Tests sm176811 1 25 Apr 2006, 23:16
Display posts from previous: Sort by

PR test scoring logic..confused

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Moderator: TGC



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.