practice... Others in this series: 1. : GMAT Sentence Correction (SC)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 20 Jan 2017, 05:16

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# practice... Others in this series: 1.

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 18 Aug 2009
Posts: 303
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 271 [1] , given: 9

practice... Others in this series: 1. [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Oct 2009, 21:38
1
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

36% (01:56) correct 64% (00:48) wrong based on 37 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

If you have any questions
New!
SVP
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 2492
Followers: 67

Kudos [?]: 734 [0], given: 19

Re: Tricky SC Series - #5 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Oct 2009, 23:11
C. "The ability to" .... is logical and idiomatic.
_________________

Gmat: http://gmatclub.com/forum/everything-you-need-to-prepare-for-the-gmat-revised-77983.html

GT

Manager
Joined: 23 Jun 2009
Posts: 156
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 9

Re: Tricky SC Series - #5 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Nov 2009, 13:51
GMAT TIGER wrote:
C. "The ability to" .... is logical and idiomatic.

" A" for me. In C- Using "would" instead of "could" changes the meaning IMO.
All other choices are unidiomatic
Manager
Joined: 22 Jul 2008
Posts: 94
Location: Bangalore,Karnataka
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 171 [0], given: 11

Re: Tricky SC Series - #5 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Nov 2009, 06:45
Agree "ability to" is idiomatic .. so C
VP
Status: There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 1353
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 240 [0], given: 10

Re: Tricky SC Series - #5 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Nov 2009, 07:04
IMO C too
But isn't predict a definitive verb.then in that case the use of Would is justified?
_________________

Visit -- http://www.sustainable-sphere.com/
Promote Green Business,Sustainable Living and Green Earth !!

Senior Manager
Joined: 18 Aug 2009
Posts: 303
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 271 [0], given: 9

Re: Tricky SC Series - #5 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Nov 2009, 21:32
1 right answer.. thanks for attempt everyone!

OA:
[Reveal] Spoiler:
A

B and D "ability for", "capability for" predicting... incorrect usage
C and E changes the meaning by using "would allow" instead of "could allow"
Manager
Joined: 23 Jun 2009
Posts: 156
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 9

Re: Tricky SC Series - #5 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Nov 2009, 00:10
gmattokyo wrote:
1 right answer.. thanks for attempt everyone!

OA:
[Reveal] Spoiler:
A

B and D "ability for", "capability for" predicting... incorrect usage
C and E changes the meaning by using "would allow" instead of "could allow"

Another thing I forgot to mention in my previous post - "would allow" not only changes the meaning but also is incorrect usage..Will should have been used instead.
Manager
Joined: 23 Jun 2009
Posts: 156
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 9

Re: Tricky SC Series - #5 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Nov 2009, 00:55
Casinoking wrote:
gmattokyo wrote:
1 right answer.. thanks for attempt everyone!

OA:
[Reveal] Spoiler:
A

B and D "ability for", "capability for" predicting... incorrect usage
C and E changes the meaning by using "would allow" instead of "could allow"

Another thing I forgot to mention in my previous post - "would allow" not only changes the meaning but also is incorrect usage..Will should have been used instead.

Why is "would allow" is incorrect usage? Please explain.

"Would" is past tense.The sentence construction doesn't need that.
Manager
Joined: 23 Jun 2009
Posts: 156
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 9

Re: Tricky SC Series - #5 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Nov 2009, 09:12
Quote:
Quote:
Why is "would allow" is incorrect usage? Please explain.

"Would" is past tense.The sentence construction doesn't need that.

Casinoking thanks for the reply, but I beg to differ.

Apart from “would” being the past tense of “will”, "would" is also used to express a customary action.

IMO in this sentence "would" is used to express a customary action.

Thanks for the link jade3. However, "would" is used in a different context in the examples given. The actions were in the past.
In this sentence the author is predicting something that might happen in the future without the usage of "conditional" statements where "would" can be used.
Manager
Joined: 17 Aug 2009
Posts: 235
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 234 [1] , given: 25

Re: Tricky SC Series - #5 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Nov 2009, 21:32
1
KUDOS
Its definitely A

Would is past tense. In fact i've seen this question before. Part of the exception series where sentences with 'being' are correct
Director
Joined: 24 Aug 2007
Posts: 954
WE 1: 3.5 yrs IT
WE 2: 2.5 yrs Retail chain
Followers: 76

Kudos [?]: 1271 [0], given: 40

Re: Tricky SC Series - #5 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 May 2010, 22:06
Great collection of good SC questions.
_________________

Tricky Quant problems: http://gmatclub.com/forum/50-tricky-questions-92834.html
Important Grammer Fundamentals: http://gmatclub.com/forum/key-fundamentals-of-grammer-our-crucial-learnings-on-sc-93659.html

Manager
Joined: 04 Feb 2010
Posts: 64
Schools: IESE '13
WE 1: Engineer
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

Re: Tricky SC Series - #5 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 May 2010, 04:06
C - need to use could instead of would
Manager
Joined: 14 Feb 2010
Posts: 99
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 0

Re: Tricky SC Series - #5 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 May 2010, 01:55
But I read in some post that 'being' is not preferred in GMAT??
Senior Manager
Joined: 03 Nov 2005
Posts: 396
Location: Chicago, IL
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 50 [0], given: 17

Re: Tricky SC Series - #5 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Aug 2010, 07:36
Casinoking wrote:
gmattokyo wrote:
1 right answer.. thanks for attempt everyone!

OA:
[Reveal] Spoiler:
A

B and D "ability for", "capability for" predicting... incorrect usage
C and E changes the meaning by using "would allow" instead of "could allow"

Another thing I forgot to mention in my previous post - "would allow" not only changes the meaning but also is incorrect usage..Will should have been used instead.

Totally disagree with you on this. "Would" is used to address abstract events. If your reasoning were correct, then "could" should be replaced with "can" cause could is the past tense of can just like would is the past tense of will. I am not right?

Fell for C because of "being". Now, i understand how use of "would" changes the meaning. "Would" means "with certainty", "guaranteed," whereas "could" merely refers to the possibility.
_________________

Hard work is the main determinant of success

SVP
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1558
Followers: 19

Kudos [?]: 577 [0], given: 6

Re: Tricky SC Series - #5 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Aug 2010, 11:43
A for me.

'ability to' is the correct idiom but the usage of 'would' is incorrect.
Senior Manager
Joined: 14 Jun 2010
Posts: 333
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 7

Re: Tricky SC Series - #5 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Aug 2010, 00:42
wavering between A and C and as my luck would have it , Chose C....Its getting regular now - me nailing the options down to 2 and ultimately choosing the wrong one!!...Damn!
Manager
Joined: 07 Apr 2009
Posts: 158
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 100 [0], given: 5

Re: Tricky SC Series - #5 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Aug 2010, 11:45
Tricky.. would changes meaning , Being, here, shows Temporary action, usage is correct
Manager
Joined: 15 Apr 2010
Posts: 170
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 70 [0], given: 3

Re: Tricky SC Series - #5 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Sep 2010, 06:37
rlevochkin wrote:
Casinoking wrote:
gmattokyo wrote:
1 right answer.. thanks for attempt everyone!

OA:
[Reveal] Spoiler:
A

B and D "ability for", "capability for" predicting... incorrect usage
C and E changes the meaning by using "would allow" instead of "could allow"

Another thing I forgot to mention in my previous post - "would allow" not only changes the meaning but also is incorrect usage..Will should have been used instead.

Totally disagree with you on this. "Would" is used to address abstract events. If your reasoning were correct, then "could" should be replaced with "can" cause could is the past tense of can just like would is the past tense of will. I am not right?

Fell for C because of "being". Now, i understand how use of "would" changes the meaning. "Would" means "with certainty", "guaranteed," whereas "could" merely refers to the possibility.

Apt explanation of how "would" changes the meaning...
Manager
Joined: 17 Jul 2011
Posts: 93
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 1

Re: practice... Others in this series: 1. [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Dec 2011, 08:01
Really good one ,i opted D. does ability for is always wrong?
Re: practice... Others in this series: 1.   [#permalink] 21 Dec 2011, 08:01
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
28 e-GMAT's Best Practices for SC - Practice 1 16 17 Feb 2013, 22:03
800+ Practice Tests SC1 3 15 Feb 2012, 17:33
3 Practice Test 2 V1 2 31 Dec 2010, 15:59
less/fewer, plural/singular Others in this series: 1. 8 31 Oct 2009, 21:23
2 Tricky SC Series - #1 10 31 Oct 2009, 21:16
Display posts from previous: Sort by