Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 25 Oct 2014, 11:21

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Premiums for automobile accident insurance are often higher

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 1226
Location: Taiwan
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 102 [0], given: 0

Premiums for automobile accident insurance are often higher [#permalink] New post 11 Apr 2005, 20:56
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Premiums for automobile accident insurance are often higher for red cars than for cars of other colors. To justify these higher charges, insurance companies claim that, overall, a greater percentage of red cars are involved in accidents than are cars of any other color. If this claim is true, then lives could undoubtedly be saved by banning red cars from the roads altogether.

The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument

(A) accepts without question that insurance companies have the right to
charge higher premiums for higher-risk clients

(B) fails to consider whether red cars cost the same to repair as cars of other colors

(C) ignores the possibility that drivers who drive recklessly have a preference for red cars

(D) does not specify precisely what percentage of red cars are involved in accidents

(E) makes an unsupported assumption that every automobile accident results in some loss of life
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 25 Nov 2004
Posts: 1497
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

Re: CR070110--premiums [#permalink] New post 11 Apr 2005, 21:35
(C) the passage is blaming red cars, not the drives, for all accidents.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5095
Location: Singapore
Followers: 19

Kudos [?]: 155 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 11 Apr 2005, 22:35
(E) makes an unsupported assumption that every automobile accident results in some loss of life
- This is the answer choice. The author says 'lives can be saved by banning red cars'. This is effect means every automobile accident will result in a loss of life.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 11 Mar 2005
Posts: 23
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 12 Apr 2005, 01:05
ywilfred wrote:
(E) makes an unsupported assumption that every automobile accident results in some loss of life
- This is the answer choice. The author says 'lives can be saved by banning red cars'. This is effect means every automobile accident will result in a loss of life.


The fact that we can save lives by stopping X does not mean that every occurrence of X leads to a loss of life.

The accident here may be caused by reckless drivers with a preference for red cars. I should know 'cos I'm one of them :lol:

Go for C
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1798
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 0

Re: CR070110--premiums [#permalink] New post 12 Apr 2005, 05:10
MA wrote:
(C) the passage is blaming red cars, not the drives, for all accidents.


MA said it just right. (C) is the answer. If the red cars are banned tghe reckless drivers will drive cars of some other color.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 03 Nov 2004
Posts: 870
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 12 Apr 2005, 08:49
I will go with 'E'
In't it true that if E isn't assumed there will not be an argument.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 27 Dec 2004
Posts: 908
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 12 Apr 2005, 08:58
I pick E because there if 90 percent of accidents are fender-benders, then what’s the point of banning red cars. Also nothing tells us that lives were lost in all accidents involving red cars
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 19 Feb 2005
Posts: 492
Location: Milan Italy
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 12 Apr 2005, 09:09
C for me.
E is wrong because the stem says "then lives could undoubtedly be saved"
this means that some lives could be saved, not all.
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 1447
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 12 Apr 2005, 09:55
shud be "C"....even with a ban on red cars, reclkess drivers cud still buy other cars and cause accident. "E" is close call too, but I think stem's last sentence doesn't use categorical statement that no lives will be lost if red cars are banned.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 17
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 12 Apr 2005, 10:01
C for me.
The argument doesn't make an assumption that 'every' accident results in some loss of life. It maybe making an assumption that some accidents result in loss of life.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 27 Dec 2004
Posts: 908
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 12 Apr 2005, 10:04
what is the OA for this question?
Sometimes we lose track and never get an OA.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 19 Feb 2005
Posts: 492
Location: Milan Italy
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 12 Apr 2005, 10:12
you're right Folaa3, but this question was posted today, and chunjuwu always provide the OA. :)
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 10 Mar 2005
Posts: 45
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 12 Apr 2005, 10:12
E is my pick . Conclusion says then lives could undoubtedly be saved by banning red cars from the roads altogether. whereas in the supporting arguments author doesn't mention that accidents cause loss of life.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Nov 2004
Posts: 459
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 13 Apr 2005, 10:53
initally picked E, now see why C is a better answer.

for example, if we lose 1 life in every 10,000 accidents, banning red cars still will "undoubtly save lifes", even just by 1.

tricky one got me.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 19 Sep 2004
Posts: 371
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 13 Apr 2005, 18:00
ywilfred wrote:
(E) makes an unsupported assumption that every automobile accident results in some loss of life
- This is the answer choice. The author says 'lives can be saved by banning red cars'. This is effect means every automobile accident will result in a loss of life.


I picked E for the same above reason.

Though the question seems to be ....the one which can be argued upon.

Saurabh Malpani
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Single but need to Prepare for GMAT
Joined: 22 Mar 2005
Posts: 132
Location: Jersey City
Schools: Harvard, NYU Stern
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 13 Apr 2005, 23:21
C cannot be the answer because if drives driving wrecklessly have a preference for red cars then after removing red cars tehy will drive the same way the car of any color.
E is the correct answer
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Single but need to Prepare for GMAT
Joined: 22 Mar 2005
Posts: 132
Location: Jersey City
Schools: Harvard, NYU Stern
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 13 Apr 2005, 23:29
hi,
in the above passage our conclusion is tht red cars removed from the road will save life and premise is that there are higher premiums for red cars.Now the reasoning given is because there are more accidents that is why there are higher premiums.The question says what is the flaw in the reasoning and only the last choice weakens the reasoning where as C supports it.
would surely like to discuss?comments are invited

regards
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5095
Location: Singapore
Followers: 19

Kudos [?]: 155 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 14 Apr 2005, 00:36
I still stick with choice E. The conclusion is 'removing red cars from the road saves life". This is based on an illogical assumption that anyone hit by a red hit will not survive.

Chunjuwu, do you have the OA for this question ? :-D
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 1226
Location: Taiwan
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 102 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 14 Apr 2005, 05:36
Thanks for your praise, thearch

sorry for late

OA is C. surprise?


Thanks
  [#permalink] 14 Apr 2005, 05:36
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
In order to determine automobile insurance premiums for a bidmanager 2 03 Oct 2011, 15:22
automobile insurance Nihit 3 05 Sep 2008, 03:42
In order to determine automobile insurance premiums for a suyashjhawar 6 31 Mar 2008, 04:23
In order to determine automobile insurance premiums for a rdg 5 01 Mar 2007, 12:15
Premiums for automobile accident insurance are often higher 93.santosh 6 24 Dec 2006, 09:11
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Premiums for automobile accident insurance are often higher

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.