Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 01 Sep 2014, 10:45

Happy Labor Day:

Free Access to New GMATClub Tests for all GMATClub Members!!


Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Prep. BF

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1941
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 277 [0], given: 1

Premium Member CAT Tests
Prep. BF [#permalink] New post 06 Jun 2008, 01:44
A product that represents a clear technological advance over competing products can generally command a high price. Because technological advances tend to be quickly surpassed and companies want to make large profits while they still can, many companies charge the maximum possible price for such a product. But large profits on the new product will give competitors a strong incentive to quickly match the new product's capabilities. Consequently, the strategy to maximize overall profit from a new product is to charge less than the greatest possible price.

In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?


(A) The first is a consideration that has been raised to argue that a certain strategy is counterproductive; the second presents that strategy.

(B) The first is a consideration raised to support the strategy that the argument recommends; the second presents that strategy.

(C) The first is a consideration raised to explain the appeal of a certain strategy; the second presents that strategy.

(D) the first is a consideration raised to explain the appeal of a certain strategy; the second is another consideration offered to support the stratregy

E) The first is a consideration that has been used to justify pursuing a goal that the argument rejects; the second presents a course of action that has been adopted in pursuit of that goal.
_________________

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Feb 2008
Posts: 90
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Re: Prep. BF [#permalink] New post 06 Jun 2008, 02:53
i will go with A..!!!
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Mar 2008
Posts: 244
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: Prep. BF [#permalink] New post 06 Jun 2008, 16:10
sondenso wrote:
A product that represents a clear technological advance over competing products can generally command a high price. Because technological advances tend to be quickly surpassed and companies want to make large profits while they still can, many companies charge the maximum possible price for such a product. But large profits on the new product will give competitors a strong incentive to quickly match the new product's capabilities. Consequently, the strategy to maximize overall profit from a new product is to charge less than the greatest possible price.

In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?


(A) The first is a consideration that has been raised to argue that a certain strategy is counterproductive; the second presents that strategy.

(B) The first is a consideration raised to support the strategy that the argument recommends; the second presents that strategy.

(C) The first is a consideration raised to explain the appeal of a certain strategy; the second presents that strategy.

(D) the first is a consideration raised to explain the appeal of a certain strategy; the second is another consideration offered to support the stratregy

E) The first is a consideration that has been used to justify pursuing a goal that the argument rejects; the second presents a course of action that has been adopted in pursuit of that goal.


Goal - max profit.
Strategy - drive towards the goal of max profits.


A, B, C - Out
BF2 is not the strategy itself.

D: BF1 does explain the appeal as the technological advances are quickly surpassed, so charging max price makes sense.
BF2: gives support to the overall strategy by rasing a consideration to fine tune the strategy to charge less than the max price possible but still maxing profits.

E. BF2 does not match.

D
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1941
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 277 [0], given: 1

Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: Prep. BF [#permalink] New post 06 Jun 2008, 17:27
Sunny143 wrote:
sondenso wrote:
A product that represents a clear technological advance over competing products can generally command a high price. Because technological advances tend to be quickly surpassed and companies want to make large profits while they still can, many companies charge the maximum possible price for such a product. But large profits on the new product will give competitors a strong incentive to quickly match the new product's capabilities. Consequently, the strategy to maximize overall profit from a new product is to charge less than the greatest possible price.

In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?


(A) The first is a consideration that has been raised to argue that a certain strategy is counterproductive; the second presents that strategy.

(B) The first is a consideration raised to support the strategy that the argument recommends; the second presents that strategy.

(C) The first is a consideration raised to explain the appeal of a certain strategy; the second presents that strategy.

(D) the first is a consideration raised to explain the appeal of a certain strategy; the second is another consideration offered to support the stratregy

E) The first is a consideration that has been used to justify pursuing a goal that the argument rejects; the second presents a course of action that has been adopted in pursuit of that goal.


Goal - max profit.
Strategy - drive towards the goal of max profits.


A, B, C - Out
BF2 is not the strategy itself.

D: BF1 does explain the appeal as the technological advances are quickly surpassed, so charging max price makes sense.
BF2: gives support to the overall strategy by rasing a consideration to fine tune the strategy to charge less than the max price possible but still maxing profits.

E. BF2 does not match.

D


Nice guy, Sunny! OA is D! your reasoning is smart! :lol:
_________________

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Mar 2008
Posts: 244
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: Prep. BF [#permalink] New post 07 Jun 2008, 18:04
Thanks Sondenso....

Thanks also for all the interesting boldface questions ...keep it up buddy...
Re: Prep. BF   [#permalink] 07 Jun 2008, 18:04
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
BF Discussion arjtryarjtry 2 08 Sep 2008, 07:38
GmatPrep. BF sondenso 8 05 Jun 2008, 20:59
BF Balvinder 2 05 Jun 2007, 23:21
BF question Jamesk486 3 18 May 2007, 04:32
BF- Aroca City perezhan 7 11 May 2005, 15:57
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Prep. BF

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.