Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 28 May 2015, 10:28

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Pretzel Vendor:tough cookie!

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
2 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Status: Prevent and prepare. Not repent and repair!!
Joined: 13 Feb 2010
Posts: 278
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GPA: 3.75
WE: Sales (Telecommunications)
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 35 [2] , given: 282

Pretzel Vendor:tough cookie! [#permalink] New post 04 Apr 2013, 11:16
2
This post received
KUDOS
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  45% (medium)

Question Stats:

68% (02:19) correct 32% (01:30) wrong based on 186 sessions
This looks dicey to me.

OA after soem discussions.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Attachments

CR_GMAT PREP.jpg
CR_GMAT PREP.jpg [ 94.71 KiB | Viewed 2418 times ]


_________________

I've failed over and over and over again in my life and that is why I succeed--Michael Jordan
Kudos drives a person to better himself every single time. So Pls give it generously
Wont give up till i hit a 700+


Last edited by rajathpanta on 06 Apr 2013, 20:52, edited 1 time in total.
1 KUDOS received
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 05 Sep 2010
Posts: 741
Followers: 42

Kudos [?]: 155 [1] , given: 49

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Pretzel Vendor:tough cookie! [#permalink] New post 04 Apr 2013, 11:24
1
This post received
KUDOS
my take wud be E :for if fewer people r likely to eat pretzel at art museum than they are at city mall then definitely the argument of vendor will hold true
Expert Post
2 KUDOS received
Current Student
User avatar
Status: Making every effort to create original content for you!!
Joined: 23 Dec 2010
Posts: 490
Location: United States
Concentration: Healthcare, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V34
GMAT 2: 750 Q49 V42
Followers: 285

Kudos [?]: 1270 [2] , given: 82

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Pretzel Vendor:tough cookie! [#permalink] New post 04 Apr 2013, 11:31
2
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
rajathpanta wrote:
This looks dicey to me.

OA after soem discussions.


Hi rajathpanta,

The argument is concerned about the vendor and bases his conclusion on the premise that he currently sells 15 pretzels and will not be able to sell 25 outside the museum to cover the license cost. So, the correct answer choice is likely to be the one that compares the current situation (sale outside the city hall) with the new situation (sale outside the museum).

(E) states that fewer people are likely to buy pretzel outside a museum than outside a city hall. This will support the conclusion of the vendor that he will not able to recover the license if he is selling fewer than 25 ( <15 according to E).


If you have any specific question then let me know.

Hope this helps,

Vercules
_________________

Press Kudos if you want to say thanks

Ultimate Reading Comprehension Encyclopedia | Ultimate Sentence Correction Encyclopedia | GMAT Prep Software Analysis and What If Scenarios -- VERBAL | GMAT Prep Software Analysis and What If Scenarios -- IR

Please Read and Follow the 9 Rules of Posting in Verbal Forum

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 29 Mar 2013
Posts: 4
Location: United States
GMAT Date: 06-29-2013
WE: Engineering (Consumer Products)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 1

Re: Pretzel Vendor:tough cookie! [#permalink] New post 05 Apr 2013, 13:17
Agree with E.

The vendor argues that the license fee would be prohibitively expensive due to his prediction that lower than 25 pretzels/hr will be sold in front of the art museum, which is the number required to break even. The introduction of the city hall sales figures functions as a way to cement the point regarding expected sales in front of the art museum, by providing alternate evidence that boosts the likelihood of the vendor's prediction (although as the paragraph is written, this is the potentially flawed part of the argument, the fact that there's a connection between sales at each location). E fills in the gap and states that art museum pretzel-hungry passerby < city hall pretzel-hungry passerby, therefore we can add it to the argument and infer that art museum sales < city hall sales (15/hr), which translate to the art museum sales being < 25 pretzels/hr needed to break even.

The only second thought I had when reading this was the fact that E only refers to # of people buying pretzels, and doesn't correlate that to # of pretzels sold. What if people passing by the art museum on average purchase more pretzels than city hall? That would mean there could be less people approaching the pretzel cart, but they may be buying a higher quantity. That might be overthinking the problem, though.. :)
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Dec 2011
Posts: 453
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 164 [0], given: 70

Re: Pretzel Vendor:tough cookie! [#permalink] New post 06 Apr 2013, 04:41
My answer is E. This option indicates that the pretzel vendor will not be able to reach the target for breakeven also.
1 KUDOS received
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 15 Jun 2012
Posts: 1153
Location: United States
Followers: 173

Kudos [?]: 1733 [1] , given: 123

Premium Member
Re: Pretzel Vendor:tough cookie! [#permalink] New post 06 Apr 2013, 15:27
1
This post received
KUDOS
@rajathpanta: thanks for sharing a nice question.

My vote is E.

First of all, this is the assumption question, which is one of the most difficult questions in CR. if you realize the question type, it will help you shorten the processing time. In this kind of question, conclusion is the most important.

Premise: must sell an average 25 pretzels /hour to break even
Premise: I only sells an average 15 pretzels /hour at my stand outside the city hall.
Conclusion: I couldn't break even running a pretzel stand outside the art museum.

Assumption: the vendor means his stand outside city hall always has more customer than stands outside the art museum. if he cannot sell a average 25 pretzels/hour at his stand, he couldn't do so at the stand outside the art museum.

If you're not sure, try the NEGATION technique. Not fewer people passing the art museum than passing the city hall likely to buy pretzels. It means the vendor can sell more pretzels if his stand is outside the art museum. The vendor's conclusion fails.

That's why E.

Hope it's clear.

___________________________
Please kudo if you like my post!
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMW Chief of Design.

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 12 Aug 2012
Posts: 23
Location: United States
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V41
WE: Project Management (Manufacturing)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 36

Re: Pretzel Vendor:tough cookie! [#permalink] New post 20 Apr 2013, 00:58
Vercules wrote:
rajathpanta wrote:
This looks dicey to me.

OA after soem discussions.


Hi rajathpanta,

The argument is concerned about the vendor and bases his conclusion on the premise that he currently sells 15 pretzels and will not be able to sell 25 outside the museum to cover the license cost. So, the correct answer choice is likely to be the one that compares the current situation (sale outside the city hall) with the new situation (sale outside the museum).

(E) states that fewer people are likely to buy pretzel outside a museum than outside a city hall. This will support the conclusion of the vendor that he will not able to recover the license if he is selling fewer than 25 ( <15 according to E).


If you have any specific question then let me know.

Hope this helps,

Vercules


Hai Vercules,

I have a doubt.. Pl clarify.

Option E says ''fewer people are likely to buy pretzel outside a museum than outside a city hall''.

Now my question is, What if the number of stands outside the city hall is more than that outside the art museum..

As per the option E, let me consider 150 people buy outside city hall and 100 people buy outside art museum.. But if there are only two stands outside the museum and 10 stalls near city hall, is it not possible that the number of customers near art museum averages to 25??

Kindly guide me where my thought process or understanding is skewed..
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 4019
Followers: 443

Kudos [?]: 94 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: Pretzel Vendor:tough cookie! [#permalink] New post 29 Jul 2014, 03:32
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 26 Jan 2013
Posts: 11
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V33
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 17

CAT Tests
Re: Pretzel Vendor:tough cookie! [#permalink] New post 19 Jan 2015, 03:47
I have my doubts regarding a few options below. Please help.

I understand that E strengthens the argument most here. Yet, dont A,B & C also strengthen it in some way and make it more believable that art museums would be less profitable?

I understand that the question says, 'find the option that MOST strenghthens'. Yet, I read somewhere that, that's a wording that GMAC uses to avoid any confusions at a later stage so that nobody can question there final answer and that GMAC only gives ONE correct option for the question asked. For eg. in a strengthener, the GMAC would only give 1 strengthener and the other options would not strengthen it.

So my question is this:

1) In a strengthen question, should there be only 1 strengthener? Or can other there be other strengthener options as well and are we looking for the best of all the strengtheners present in some questions?

For eg. In A : 'There is currently no license fee for operating a pretzel stand outside city hall.'

I understand that what is currently outside city hall has no bearing on whether the stand outside the museum would make losses or not because of the license fees.
However, let's take this scenario: The stand outside city hall has no license fee. This means that there is a chance that the profits outside the hall will be more compared to the stands outside the museum where there is a new license fee, since the stands outside the hall have no license cost in their cost price while those outside the museums do. Now, I'm not saying that this scenario has a big of chance of happening. Yet, doesnt this possibility make the conclusion more believable? If it does, then isnt it making the conclusion more believable? Isnt that the exact definition of a strengthener?

Pretzel vendor: The new license fee for operating a pretzel stand outside the art museum is prohibitively expensive. Charging typical prices, a vendor would need to sell an average of 25 pretzels per hour to break even. At my stand outside city hall, I average only 15 per hour. Therefore, I could not break even running a pretzel stand outside the art museum, much less turn a profit.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the pretzel vendor’s argument?

(A) There is currently no license fee for operating a pretzel stand outside city hall.
-> whats happening in city hall is not of any concern here.
(B) Pretzel vendors who operate stands outside the art museum were making a profit before the imposition of the new license fee.
-> what was happening before is of no relevance now.
(C) The number of pretzel stands outside the art museum is no greater than the number of pretzel stands now outside city hall.
-> number of stands may be same or less but there might be enough demand in the museums.
(D) People who buy pretzels at pretzel stands are most likely to do so during the hours at which the art museum is open to the public.
-> we still need to have idea about the rest of the hours which can have a significant result on the end sale result.
(E) Fewer people passing the art museum than passing city hall are likely to buy pretzels.
-> if few ppl are likely to buy compared to those who would


Please explain why the wrong answers are wrong.

Regards,
Sandeep
Re: Pretzel Vendor:tough cookie!   [#permalink] 19 Jan 2015, 03:47
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Experts publish their posts in the topic Sugar Cookies and Contingency Plans CriticalSquare 0 23 Dec 2013, 09:45
1 Experts publish their posts in the topic In a cookie-eating contest, there are 200 cookies provided danzig 10 19 Nov 2012, 08:49
1 Experts publish their posts in the topic A baker makes chocolate cookies and peanut cookies. His kashishh 4 17 May 2012, 02:32
1 In a cookie-eating contest, there are 200 cookies provided guygmat 7 18 Jun 2011, 20:03
Cookie Problem beatgmat 5 20 Sep 2007, 10:22
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Pretzel Vendor:tough cookie!

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.