Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 13 Jul 2014, 21:30

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Pretzels can cause cavities. Interestingly, the longer that

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 05 Aug 2005
Posts: 415
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Pretzels can cause cavities. Interestingly, the longer that [#permalink] New post 08 Nov 2006, 17:20
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

56% (02:37) correct 43% (01:36) wrong based on 30 sessions
Pretzels can cause cavities. Interestingly, the longer that a pretzel remains in contact with the teeth when it is being eaten, the greater the likelihood that a cavity will result. What is true of pretzels in this regard is also true of caramels. Therefore, since caramels dissolve more quickly in the mouth than pretzels do, eating a caramel is less likely to result in a cavity than eating a pretzel is.
The reasoning in the argument is vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that the argument
(A) treats a correlation that holds within individual categories as thereby holding across categories as well
(B) relies on the ambiguous use of a key term
(C) makes a general claim based on particular examples that do not adequately represent the respective classes that they are each intended to represent
(D) mistakes the cause of a particular phenomenon for the effect of that phenomenon
(E) is based on premises that cannot all be true

Please explain your reasoning .......
3 KUDOS received
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 1026
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 17 [3] , given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR:Pretzels [#permalink] New post 08 Nov 2006, 18:59
3
This post received
KUDOS
gmacvik wrote:
Pretzels can cause cavities. Interestingly, the longer that a pretzel remains in contact with the teeth when it is being eaten, the greater the likelihood that a cavity will result. What is true of pretzels in this regard is also true of caramels. Therefore, since caramels dissolve more quickly in the mouth than pretzels do, eating a caramel is less likely to result in a cavity than eating a pretzel is.
The reasoning in the argument is vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that the argument
(A) treats a correlation that holds within individual categories as thereby holding across categories as well
(B) relies on the ambiguous use of a key term
(C) makes a general claim based on particular examples that do not adequately represent the respective classes that they are each intended to represent
(D) mistakes the cause of a particular phenomenon for the effect of that phenomenon
(E) is based on premises that cannot all be true

Please explain your reasoning .......


Tough question. I would bet on A.

Eating Pretzels can cause cavities, and longer touch with teeth means more chances of cavities. Eating Caramels also can cause cavities, and longer touch with teeth means more chances of cavities. These are correlations in individual categories.

Caramels dissolve more quickly in the mouth than pretzels do, does not mean that caramels are less likely to cause cavities. Because, caramels might cause cavities in the short time they are in touch with teeth. Caramels may get dissolved fast, but they may be more dangerous per unit of time compared to pretzels.

Hence, the argument is right in relating in individual categories, but not right when comparing across categories (caramels and pretzels).
_________________

The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short;
the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 148
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 18 [1] , given: 0

Re: CR:Pretzels [#permalink] New post 09 Nov 2006, 03:34
1
This post received
KUDOS
Yes the correlation that staying longer in contact with teeth increases the likelihood that a cavity will be created holds true for pretzel. the author uses the same correlation with caramel. Therefore the criticism of the above argument is best explained by A.
_________________

Neelabh Mahesh

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 17 Jul 2006
Posts: 716
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 08 Nov 2006, 17:39
Looks like C.

Will explain if it's right.
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Posts: 1136
Location: Bangalore
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR:Pretzels [#permalink] New post 08 Nov 2006, 19:29
ak_idc wrote:
gmacvik wrote:
Pretzels can cause cavities. Interestingly, the longer that a pretzel remains in contact with the teeth when it is being eaten, the greater the likelihood that a cavity will result. What is true of pretzels in this regard is also true of caramels. Therefore, since caramels dissolve more quickly in the mouth than pretzels do, eating a caramel is less likely to result in a cavity than eating a pretzel is.
The reasoning in the argument is vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that the argument
(A) treats a correlation that holds within individual categories as thereby holding across categories as well
(B) relies on the ambiguous use of a key term
(C) makes a general claim based on particular examples that do not adequately represent the respective classes that they are each intended to represent
(D) mistakes the cause of a particular phenomenon for the effect of that phenomenon
(E) is based on premises that cannot all be true

Please explain your reasoning .......


Tough question. I would bet on A.

Eating Pretzels can cause cavities, and longer touch with teeth means more chances of cavities. Eating Caramels also can cause cavities, and longer touch with teeth means more chances of cavities. These are correlations in individual categories.

Caramels dissolve more quickly in the mouth than pretzels do, does not mean that caramels are less likely to cause cavities. Because, caramels might cause cavities in the short time they are in touch with teeth. Caramels may get dissolved fast, but they may be more dangerous per unit of time compared to pretzels.

Hence, the argument is right in relating in individual categories, but not right when comparing across categories (caramels and pretzels).


One more for A. Text book explanation!!! PLEASE tell me what you are using for CR prep. I really need some help for CR :oops:
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5253
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 120 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User Reviews Badge
 [#permalink] New post 08 Nov 2006, 19:34
Between A and C here.

I'll take (A) for the usage of "indivual categories."
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Oct 2006
Posts: 439
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 09 Nov 2006, 03:18
A as explained above
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 Sep 2006
Posts: 153
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 09 Nov 2006, 04:06
Go for C
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 09 Oct 2005
Posts: 728
Location: Madrid
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR:Pretzels [#permalink] New post 09 Nov 2006, 10:27
ak_idc wrote:
gmacvik wrote:
Pretzels can cause cavities. Interestingly, the longer that a pretzel remains in contact with the teeth when it is being eaten, the greater the likelihood that a cavity will result. What is true of pretzels in this regard is also true of caramels. Therefore, since caramels dissolve more quickly in the mouth than pretzels do, eating a caramel is less likely to result in a cavity than eating a pretzel is.
The reasoning in the argument is vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that the argument
(A) treats a correlation that holds within individual categories as thereby holding across categories as well
(B) relies on the ambiguous use of a key term
(C) makes a general claim based on particular examples that do not adequately represent the respective classes that they are each intended to represent
(D) mistakes the cause of a particular phenomenon for the effect of that phenomenon
(E) is based on premises that cannot all be true

Please explain your reasoning .......


Tough question. I would bet on A.

Eating Pretzels can cause cavities, and longer touch with teeth means more chances of cavities. Eating Caramels also can cause cavities, and longer touch with teeth means more chances of cavities. These are correlations in individual categories.

Caramels dissolve more quickly in the mouth than pretzels do, does not mean that caramels are less likely to cause cavities. Because, caramels might cause cavities in the short time they are in touch with teeth. Caramels may get dissolved fast, but they may be more dangerous per unit of time compared to pretzels.

Hence, the argument is right in relating in individual categories, but not right when comparing across categories (caramels and pretzels).

Wow)Nice explanation
_________________

IE IMBA 2010

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Jan 2005
Posts: 73
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 09 Nov 2006, 10:38
ak_idc, Great explanation.

I would pick A. OA please?
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 11 May 2010
Posts: 226
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 11

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR:Pretzels [#permalink] New post 26 Aug 2011, 10:20
I still don't quite get this question, can someone help me again with this one, thanks.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 21 Jun 2011
Posts: 44
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

GMAT ToolKit User GMAT Tests User
Re: CR:Pretzels [#permalink] New post 26 Aug 2011, 15:17
+1 for A, my reasoning echos gmacvik's
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Feb 2011
Posts: 113
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 25

Re: CR:Pretzels [#permalink] New post 26 Aug 2011, 15:21
tough one between A and C. I would vote for C.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Jun 2011
Posts: 77
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 31

Re: CR:Pretzels [#permalink] New post 26 Aug 2011, 23:53
I would opt for D.

The argument above is prone to serious criticism if the result as per the argument can be proved as the cause.. Do you agree?


in our case pritzels could be sticking on the teeth because of the cavities that are already there.. So a criticism like in the statement D would say pritxels are not causing cavities but cavities are causing pritzels to stick to the teeth.

Can somebody post the official answer
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 Jun 2011
Posts: 147
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 1

Re: CR:Pretzels [#permalink] New post 27 Aug 2011, 10:31
Yes OA please..

Can anybody explain why C cannot be the answer???
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 31 Aug 2011
Posts: 209
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 44

CAT Tests
Re: Pretzels can cause cavities. Interestingly, the longer that [#permalink] New post 15 Oct 2012, 21:18
I found nice discussion on this topic at pretzels-can-cause-cavities-interestingly-the-longer-that-20427.html
_________________

If you found my contribution helpful, please click the +1 Kudos button on the left, I kinda need some =)

Re: Pretzels can cause cavities. Interestingly, the longer that   [#permalink] 15 Oct 2012, 21:18
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 Experts publish their posts in the topic Since pollution-causing human activities can cause an bschool83 27 14 Aug 2011, 06:48
7 Pretzels can cause cavities. Interestingly, the longer that eastcoaster9 19 25 Sep 2005, 11:14
Although fruit can no longer grow once it is picked, it cybera 3 19 Jul 2005, 09:50
Pretzels can cause cavities. Interestingly, the longer that WinWinMBA 1 20 Jun 2005, 10:28
Although fruit can no longer grow once it is picked, it boksana 11 26 Nov 2004, 13:08
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Pretzels can cause cavities. Interestingly, the longer that

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.