Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 26 Jul 2014, 11:39

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Printwell s Ink Jet Division manufactures ink-jet printers

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 22 Nov 2007
Posts: 1101
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 106 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
cr [#permalink] New post 27 Jan 2008, 01:59
Printwell’s Ink Jet Division manufactures ink-jet printers and the ink cartridges they use. Sales of its ink-jet printers have increased. Monthly revenues from those sales, however, have not increased, because competition has forced Printwell to cut the prices of its printers. Unfortunately, Printwell has been unable to bring down the cost of manufacturing a printer. Thus, despite the increase in printer sales, the Ink Jet Division must be providing the company with much smaller than it used to.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A. Ink-jet printers in regular use frequently need new ink cartridges, and Printwell’s printers only accept Printwell’s ink cartridges.
B. Unlike some competing companies, Printwell sells all of its printers through retailers, and these retailers’ costs account for a sizable proportion of the printers’ ultimate retail price.
C. Some printer manufacturers have been forced to reduce the sale price of their ink-jet printers even more than Printwell has.
D. In the past year, no competing manufacturer of ink-jet printers has had as great an increase in unit sales of printers as Printwell has.
E. In the past year, sales of Printwell’s ink-jet printers have increased more than sales of any other type of printer made by Printwell.

I didn't catch this one, please, help!
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Dec 2007
Posts: 99
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

Re: cr [#permalink] New post 27 Jan 2008, 02:32
A..
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 22 Nov 2007
Posts: 1101
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 106 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: cr [#permalink] New post 27 Jan 2008, 02:34
rafiaiqbal wrote:
A..



explanations please
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Dec 2007
Posts: 99
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

Re: cr [#permalink] New post 27 Jan 2008, 02:40
since the question does not talk abt the competing businesses in the printer industry, B C D are out...even if the inkjet printers are witnessing lower sales (as a result of lower prices), frequently demanded inkjet cartridges will compensate for the decline thereby weakening the argument that sales will be lower..
E is out of scope as well..
i m not sure abt the approach though...whats the OA?
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 22 Nov 2007
Posts: 1101
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 106 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: cr [#permalink] New post 27 Jan 2008, 03:17
rafiaiqbal wrote:
since the question does not talk abt the competing businesses in the printer industry, B C D are out...even if the inkjet printers are witnessing lower sales (as a result of lower prices), frequently demanded inkjet cartridges will compensate for the decline thereby weakening the argument that sales will be lower..
E is out of scope as well..
i m not sure abt the approach though...whats the OA?



OA is A, some more explan, please...
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 31 May 2010
Posts: 38
Schools: ESADE, IE
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 2

Re: CR - Printwell [#permalink] New post 29 Aug 2011, 18:41
Only A makes sense.
Retired Moderator
User avatar
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1727
Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Followers: 63

Kudos [?]: 253 [0], given: 109

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR - Printwell [#permalink] New post 29 Aug 2011, 22:45
+1 A
_________________

"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."

My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 15 Jun 2012
Posts: 992
Location: United States
Followers: 112

Kudos [?]: 1099 [0], given: 118

Re: Printwell s Ink Jet Division manufactures ink-jet printers [#permalink] New post 13 Jul 2013, 09:07
I'm Responding to a PM

swati007 wrote:


ANALYZE THE STIMULUS:

Fact: Printwell’s Ink Jet Division manufactures both ink-jet printers and the ink cartridges they use.
Fact: Sales of its ink-jet printers have increased.
Fact: But monthly revenues from those sales have not increased, because competition has forced Printwell to cut the prices of its printers.
Fact: Printwell has been unable to bring down the cost of manufacturing a printer.
Conclusion: Despite the increase in printer sales, the Ink Jet Division must be providing the company with much smaller than it used to.

Pre-thingking: We know: Ink Jet Division revenues = revenues from printer sales + revenues from cartridges sales. The argument says ONLY “revenues from printers sales have NOT increased”, and concludes that “Ink Jet Division TOTAL revenues must be smaller”. To weaken this argument, we can show that even though revenues from printers sales DECREASES, but revenues from cartridges sales INCREASE ==> Total revenues will not be smaller.

ANALYZE EACH ANSWER:

A. Ink-jet printers in regular use frequently need new ink cartridges, and Printwell’s printers only accept Printwell’s ink cartridges.
Correct. A states that it’s possible that revenues from cartridges sales will increase. KEY word “in regular use frequently”.

B. Unlike some competing companies, Printwell sells all of its printers through retailers, and these retailers’ costs account for a sizable proportion of the printers’ ultimate retail price.
Wrong. B may strengthen the conclusion (. The retailers’ cost is additional cost that makes a negative effect for the Ink Jet Division.

C. Some printer manufacturers have been forced to reduce the sale price of their ink-jet printers even more than Printwell has.
Wrong. Ink Jet Division’s revenue may be still smaller if its sales from printers and cartridges do not increases. The argument clearly states that “revenue from printers sales have not increased”, so the fact that other manufactures reduces their printers prices DOES NOT affect the conclusion.

D. In the past year, no competing manufacturer of ink-jet printers has had as great an increase in unit sales of printers as Printwell has.
Wrong. We do not talk about “the past”. D is out.

E. In the past year, sales of Printwell’s ink-jet printers have increased more than sales of any other type of printer made by Printwell.
Wrong. Same as D. In this case, the fact in the past does not help you weaken a conclusion that talks about the future.

Hope it helps.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMV Chief of Design.

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 22 Apr 2013
Posts: 88
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 95

Re: Printwell s Ink Jet Division manufactures ink-jet printers [#permalink] New post 13 Jul 2013, 12:49
Guilty, I answered E. After rethinking, and reading everyone's comments, it's so obviously A

Total Division Profits = Printer Profits + Cartridge Profits
_________________

I do not beg for kudos.

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 15 Sep 2011
Posts: 182
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, International Business
WE: Corporate Finance (Manufacturing)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 61 [0], given: 5

Re: Printwell s Ink Jet Division manufactures ink-jet printers [#permalink] New post 23 Dec 2013, 15:17
Does GMAT use Sales (the absolute value) and Sales Unit (quantity of units) interchangeably?

This problems appears to do so, in connect with answer E. Answer E "...sales of Printwell's ink-jet division printers have increased more than sales of any other type of printer..." does not reconcile with the stimulus "Monthly revenues from those sales, however, have not increased." If so, it's very annoying.

:stupid2
_________________

A little kudos never hurt anyone. :)

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 04 Oct 2013
Posts: 77
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Leadership
GMAT 1: 590 Q40 V30
GPA: 3.98
WE: Project Management (Entertainment and Sports)
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 16

Re: cr [#permalink] New post 12 Jan 2014, 09:00
Printwell’s Ink Jet Division manufactures ink-jet printers and the ink cartridges they use. Sales of its ink-jet printers have increased. Monthly revenues from those sales, however, have not increased, because competition has forced Printwell to cut the prices of its printers. Unfortunately, Printwell has been unable to bring down the cost of manufacturing a printer. Thus, despite the increase in printer sales, the Ink Jet Division must be providing the company with much smaller than it used to.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A. Ink-jet printers in regular use frequently need new ink cartridges, and Printwell’s printers only accept Printwell’s ink cartridges.
B. Unlike some competing companies, Printwell sells all of its printers through retailers, and these retailers’ costs account for a sizable proportion of the printers’ ultimate retail price.
C. Some printer manufacturers have been forced to reduce the sale price of their ink-jet printers even more than Printwell has.
D. In the past year, no competing manufacturer of ink-jet printers has had as great an increase in unit sales of printers as Printwell has.
E. In the past year, sales of Printwell’s ink-jet printers have increased more than sales of any other type of printer made by Printwell.

Cutting the selling price caused sales of its printer to surge, if Printwell printer runs exclusively Printwell cartridges the revenues from cartridges will surge as well. This way the company's management could avoid slashing funds devoted to its development division.
A.

_________________

Either suffer the pain of discipline, or suffer the pain of regret.

If my posts are helping you show some love awarding a kudos

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 31 May 2012
Posts: 166
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 60 [0], given: 69

CAT Tests
Re: Printwell s Ink Jet Division manufactures ink-jet printers [#permalink] New post 20 May 2014, 22:54
What is meant by "the Ink Jet Division must be providing the company with much smaller than it used to." which is part of conclusion ?
1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 11 Nov 2013
Posts: 33
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 6 [1] , given: 7

Re: Printwell s Ink Jet Division manufactures ink-jet printers [#permalink] New post 20 May 2014, 23:28
1
This post received
KUDOS
umeshpatil wrote:
What is meant by "the Ink Jet Division must be providing the company with much smaller than it used to." which is part of conclusion ?


Hi Umesh

the Ink Jet Division must be providing the company with much smaller than it used to” would be weakened.

This statement is the conclusion of the argument. It talks about the contribution of Ink Jet Division. According to the statement, the contribution of Ink Jet Division must be smaller than it used to.

Let's look at the argument:

Sales of its ink-jet printers have increased.

Monthly revenues from those sales, however, have not increased, because competition has forced Printwell to cut the prices of its printers.

Unfortunately, Printwell has been unable to bring down the cost of manufacturing a printer.


Now, we know from the passage that despite the increase in sales, the revenues have not increased and cost of manufacturing a printer has not declined. This would mean that profit per unit can be smaller than it used to be.

Revenue - cost= Profit (contribution to the company)

However, the conclusion is drawn upon the contribution of the Ink Jet Division and not just the contribution of the Ink Jet printers. As given, Ink Jet Division manufactures ink-jet printers and the ink cartridges they use. Hence, if the profit from the sales of cartridges is large enough to compensate or exceed the decline in contribution from the sales of printer, conclusion that “the Ink Jet Division must be providing the company with much smaller than it used to” would be weakened.

Does it help?
Dolly
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 31 May 2012
Posts: 166
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 60 [0], given: 69

CAT Tests
Re: Printwell s Ink Jet Division manufactures ink-jet printers [#permalink] New post 21 May 2014, 00:02
Hi Dolly,
thanks for reply :-D . First Kudo for you !
I only wanted to get little explanation on below unfinished sentence, which is conclusion that is required to weaken.
"the Ink Jet Division must be providing the company with much smaller than it used to??."
Can you please tell me ?
1. must be providing the company... which company ?
2. smaller than it used to .. what it is used to ?
1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 11 Nov 2013
Posts: 33
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 6 [1] , given: 7

Re: Printwell s Ink Jet Division manufactures ink-jet printers [#permalink] New post 21 May 2014, 01:02
1
This post received
KUDOS
umeshpatil wrote:
Hi Dolly,
thanks for reply :-D . First Kudo for you !
I only wanted to get little explanation on below unfinished sentence, which is conclusion that is required to weaken.
"the Ink Jet Division must be providing the company with much smaller than it used to??."
Can you please tell me ?
1. must be providing the company... which company ?
2. smaller than it used to .. what it is used to ?



Thanks for the appreciation! :)

A company can hold several divisions. A division is a part of the company such as sales division, marketing division and operations division.

1) The company mentioned in the argument is the one that holds Ink Jet division.

Suppose you have a company U. It has several divisions such as Ink Jet division, laser division and other divisions. Ink Jet division used to provide 40% of company's overall profit.

This means if the total profit of the company used to be $100. Ink Jet provided $40 to the company.

Now the conclusion is that Ink Jet division must be providing smaller than it used to.

2) This means that the contribution of the Ink Jet division must be lesser than $40.

Used to refer to the contribution of Ink Jet Division to the company in the past.



Does this help?

Dolly
Re: Printwell s Ink Jet Division manufactures ink-jet printers   [#permalink] 21 May 2014, 01:02
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Buying printers kostyan5 7 08 Nov 2011, 19:02
Think Without Ink anstance5 0 01 May 2011, 10:02
Printer speed............ milind1979 5 01 Apr 2009, 02:20
CR-Passenger-jet division dvtohir 20 30 Apr 2007, 05:54
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Printwell s Ink Jet Division manufactures ink-jet printers

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 35 posts ] 



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.