Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 25 Oct 2014, 06:46

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Professor Robinson: A large meteorite impact crater in a

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 1226
Location: Taiwan
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 102 [0], given: 0

Professor Robinson: A large meteorite impact crater in a [#permalink] New post 29 Apr 2005, 05:55
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Professor Robinson: A large meteorite impact crater in a certain region was thought to be the clue to explaining the mass extinction of plant and animal species that occurred at the end of the Mesozoic era. However, the crystalline structure of rocks recovered at the site indicates that the impact that formed this crater was not the culprit. When molten rocks crystallize, they display the polarity of Earth’s magnetic field at that time. But the recrystallized rocks recovered at the site display normal magnetic polarity, even though Earth’s magnetic field was reversed at the time of the mass extinction.

Each of the following is an assumption on which Professor Robinson’s argument depends EXCEPT:

(A) The crater indicates an impact of more than sufficient size to have caused the mass extinction.

(B) The recovered rocks recrystallized shortly after they melted.

(C) No other event caused the rocks to melt after the impact formed the crater.

(D) The recovered rocks melted as a result of the impact that formed the crater.

(E) The mass extinction would have occurred soon after the impact that supposedly caused it.
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5252
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 140 [0], given: 0

Reviews Badge
 [#permalink] New post 30 Apr 2005, 22:09
A. The professor clearly indicates that the crater was thought to have been the culprit.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 04 Jul 2004
Posts: 905
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 01 May 2005, 06:45
GOSH... :evil:

I will go for (E).
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 1226
Location: Taiwan
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 102 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 01 May 2005, 22:18
Yes

OA is A,

would anyone kindly explain?

thank you :(
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Apr 2005
Posts: 82
Location: Lontano da dove
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 05 May 2005, 01:12
Yes, would someone kindly explain this one? For instance, how do we assume that the rocks recrystallized “shortlyâ€
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 10 Mar 2005
Posts: 34
Location: india
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 05 May 2005, 10:10
A.

The professor argues that the impact is not the cause.

The arguement says When molten rocks crystallize, they display the polarity of Earth’s magnetic field at that time. But the recrystallized rocks recovered at the site display normal magnetic polarity, even though Earth’s magnetic field was reversed at the time of the mass extinction.

If the molten rocks recrystallised after some time, this would go against his arguement. He needs to assume that the melting and recrystallisation of the rocks took place as a result of and soon after the impact. B is an assumption.

Same reason is behind C, D and E.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
Posts: 345
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 05 May 2005, 11:26
chunjuwu wrote:
Yes

OA is A,

would anyone kindly explain?

thank you :(


I guess it's A. Because assumptions are elements in an argument that are assumed. A is clearly stated, not assumed.
  [#permalink] 05 May 2005, 11:26
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Professor Robinson: A large meteorite impact crater in a noboru 5 20 Jul 2010, 13:37
1 Experts publish their posts in the topic Meteorite explosions in the Earth s atmosphere as large as pi10t 28 04 Apr 2007, 18:42
Impact craters caused by meteorites smashing into Earth have gmat_crack 7 07 Mar 2006, 18:02
Impact craters caused by meteorites smashing into Earth have WinWinMBA 10 10 May 2005, 15:14
Impact craters caused by meteorites smashing into Earth have GMATPIPO 10 08 Jan 2005, 13:52
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Professor Robinson: A large meteorite impact crater in a

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.