Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Please evaluate my profile and provide me with critical feedback. Work experience: 4 years, of which 6 months in consulting (erstwhile Monitor) and rest in Test & Measurement B2B Sales (business development role with a revenue target) GMAT: 750 (Q:50, V:41), AWA: 4, IR: 8, TOEFL: 112 Extra curricular: very active in the start-up circle: regular interactions with technology start-ups, guiding tech start-ups to break-even Education: B.E. from a top-10 engineering institution in India (non IIT)...scholarship and diverse volunteer experience, CGPA aroung 3.6-3.7
My target schools are: Tuck, Kellogg, Duke, Cornell, Yale, Darden Post MBA goal: Product management-Technology
A nagging query I have is: as a non-native speaker how do I mitigate this AWA score? should I give GMAT again? and whether this score is a deal-breaker at my target schools. This is a riding concern as I received a Fuqua ding earlier and have been evaluating/introspecting the reasons for that ding.
Your thoughts/insights would be really appreciated
Regarding the AWA score – your overall GMAT is excellent, so to avoid redoing it, I suggest a few other steps to mitigate the low AWA. First, in your essays (a) make sure they’re very well written, expressing ideas/insights and describing experiences and plans substantively; (b) select examples and anecdotes that reflect strong communication skills. Second, if you are able to influence your recommenders, ask them to stress your strong verbal skills and to provide examples of same.
As far as the ding from Duke, I can’t say for sure, but I think it’s more likely that the presentation overall wasn’t optimized; wasn’t fully effective. Applicants can be dinged due to (a) lack of qualifications, (b) less than stellar presentation, or (c) both. For competitive programs, which reject a good number of well qualified applicants, the most common reason is (b). Qualifications are just a starting point for competitive programs; to be admitted you must give them a compelling reason why they should select you out of other equally qualified and accomplished applicants from your same demographic and/or industry group. Of course I haven’t seen your app, so this is a bit speculative. But the AWA doesn’t hold huge sway with adcoms unless there is other evidence of poor verbal ability, and I doubt it would be the deciding factor in the ding.
I do think your list of schools is strong and offers a good range of competitiveness for your profile. Please contact us if you’re interested in assistance to ensure your next round of apps do the job -- _________________
Check out this awesome article about Anderson on Poets Quants, http://poetsandquants.com/2015/01/02/uclas-anderson-school-morphs-into-a-friendly-tech-hub/ . Anderson is a great place! Sorry for the lack of updates recently. I...