Pronoun Agreement Question : GMAT Verbal Section
Check GMAT Club App Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

It is currently 08 Dec 2016, 11:35
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Pronoun Agreement Question

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Posts: 1538
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 730 [0], given: 1

Pronoun Agreement Question [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jan 2008, 00:53
"The department of labor allows the fees of investment officers to be based on the performance of the funds they manage."


I came across this example from an ebook, which simply said that this sentence is considered correct because the pronoun "they" is clearly referring to the referent "officers." What I have done is underlined both "officers" and "fees" and would like to know how come the pronoun "they" is not considered ambiguous? because it could also refer to the plural noun "fees" or are we suppose to consider the LOGICAL referent? I'm confused because sometimes I read a book that says never to allow a pronoun have more than 1 possible referent, and then here, I see something else. Although I do agree that "officers" is a logical referent, but there are people who could get confused with the intended referent. Are we suppose to limit our pronouns to only 1 possible referent, or we could be flexible, but provided that we have a logical referent? Would anyone who have any solid idea share it with me and shed some lights? i'd really appreciate it. thanks
Request Expert Reply
If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
Pronoun Agreement Question   [#permalink] 08 Jan 2008, 00:53
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Pronoun agreement in number, ambiguous cases smalluser 3 13 Jun 2014, 06:24
grammar question - pronoun reference zhenmaster 3 16 Mar 2008, 12:02
pronouns: they / their / there gowani 4 31 Oct 2007, 15:03
Pronouns jimjohn 6 10 Oct 2007, 09:50
Quick question: SV agreement garyxb 7 03 Oct 2007, 13:30
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Pronoun Agreement Question

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.