Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 28 Aug 2016, 17:39

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

### Show Tags

05 Nov 2012, 17:27
7
KUDOS
11
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

47% (02:34) correct 53% (01:31) wrong based on 621 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per $1,000 of officially assessed value. Reassessments should be frequent in order to remove distortions that arise when property values change at differential rates. In practice, however, reassessments typically occur when they benefit the government—that is, when their effect is to increase total tax revenue. If the statements above are true, which of the following describes a situation in which a reassessment should occur but is unlikely to do so? Property values have risen sharply and uniformly. Property values have all risen—some very sharply, some less so. Property values have for the most part risen sharply; yet some have dropped slightly. Property values have for the most part dropped significantly; yet some have risen slightly. Property values have dropped significantly and uniformly. I came across this question today at mba.com and even if I understood the logic behind I do not know how to list this CR Try it. Thanks [Reveal] Spoiler: OA _________________ Last edited by carcass on 06 Nov 2012, 01:39, edited 1 time in total. Director Status: Done with formalities.. and back.. Joined: 15 Sep 2012 Posts: 647 Location: India Concentration: Strategy, General Management Schools: Olin - Wash U - Class of 2015 WE: Information Technology (Computer Software) Followers: 43 Kudos [?]: 508 [2] , given: 23 Re: Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per$1,000 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Nov 2012, 20:02
2
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
carcass wrote:
Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per $1,000 of officially assessed value. Reassessments should be frequent in order to remove distortions that arise when property values change at differential rates. In practice, however, reassessments typically occur when they benefit the government—that is, when their effect is to increase total tax revenue. If the statements above are true, which of the following describes a situation in which a reassessment should occur but is unlikely to do so? Property values have risen sharply and uniformly. Property values have all risen—some very sharply, some less so. Property values have for the most part risen sharply; yet some have dropped slightly. Property values have for the most part dropped significantly; yet some have risen slightly. Property values have dropped significantly and uniformly. I came across this question today at mba.com and even if I understood the logic behind I do not know how to list this CR Try it. Thanks "a situation in which a reassessment should occur but is unlikely to do so" Reassessment should occur when property value changes at differential rates - A & E out among B,C and D, only D provides a case where new taxes would be lower if reassessment is done. So it is highly unlikely that the reassesment would be done. (reassessments typically occur when they benefit the government). Hence Ans D it is! _________________ Lets Kudos!!! Black Friday Debrief Moderator Joined: 02 Jul 2012 Posts: 1230 Location: India Concentration: Strategy GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42 GPA: 3.8 WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities) Followers: 110 Kudos [?]: 1255 [1] , given: 116 Re: Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per$1,000 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Nov 2012, 23:42
1
KUDOS
Rates must have increased ununiformly or decreased ununiformly or there should have been increase in certain areas and decrease in other areas. So only B,C & D remain. Reassessment will not occur unless there has been more increase than decrease. So only D stands the test.

Kudos Please... If my post helped.
_________________

Did you find this post helpful?... Please let me know through the Kudos button.

Thanks To The Almighty - My GMAT Debrief

GMAT Reading Comprehension: 7 Most Common Passage Types

Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 6830
Location: Pune, India
Followers: 1926

Kudos [?]: 11970 [5] , given: 221

Re: Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per $1,000 [#permalink] ### Show Tags 06 Nov 2012, 00:19 5 This post received KUDOS Expert's post carcass wrote: Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per$1,000 of officially assessed value. Reassessments should be frequent in order to remove distortions that arise when property values change at differential rates. In practice, however, reassessments typically occur when they benefit the government—that is, when their effect is to increase total tax revenue.

If the statements above are true, which of the following describes a situation in which a reassessment should occur but is unlikely to do so?

Property values have risen sharply and uniformly.

Property values have all risen—some very sharply, some less so.

Property values have for the most part risen sharply; yet some have dropped slightly.

Property values have for the most part dropped significantly; yet some have risen slightly.

Property values have dropped significantly and uniformly.

I came across this question today at mba.com and even if I understood the logic behind I do not know how to list this CR

Try it. Thanks

You might have come across mimic questions. You are given a particular argument and you have to find another argument which uses the same logic or you are given a situation and you have to find examples of that situation etc. This is a type of mimic question.
Understand the argument:
Property taxes are set at a flat rate per $1,000 of officially assessed value. When property values change at differential rates, reassessment should happen. In practice, reassessments occur when they increase total tax revenue. When will total tax revenue increase? When the total assessed value increases. Reassessments are needed when property values change at differential rates (rates of some properties go up, for some go down or for some go up steeply and for some go up slightly). But they will probably happen only when overall, the reassessed value will be higher than previous value (and when values change at differential rate) In part D, the values have changed at differential rates so reassessment should happen. But the reassessed value will be lower than the current value so it will probably not happen. Answer D _________________ Karishma Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor My Blog Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for$199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Moderator
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 2994
Followers: 715

Kudos [?]: 5751 [0], given: 971

### Show Tags

06 Nov 2012, 02:05
Argument provides a particular phenomenon which is generally true and ask to Evaluate the situation in which the phenomenon is not true.

Phenomenon: Property tax is calculated based on the property value. Reassessment should be done if property value changes drastically. In practice government does reassessment only when property value has gone up.

Question ask us to evaluate a situation in which as per the phenomenon reassessment should be done but as per the practice government will not do the reassessment.

only option D provides such a situation.

I would say this is a evaluate problem.
_________________

-------Analyze why option A in SC wrong-------

Moderator
Joined: 02 Jul 2012
Posts: 1230
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 110

Kudos [?]: 1255 [0], given: 116

### Show Tags

22 Jan 2014, 00:05
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Current Student
Joined: 04 May 2013
Posts: 354
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Human Resources
Schools: ISB '16, IIMA (M)
GPA: 4
WE: Human Resources (Human Resources)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 106 [1] , given: 70

### Show Tags

04 Apr 2014, 01:58
The question clearly mentions that " In practice, however, reassessments typically occur when they benefit the government".

and question asks "which of the following describes a situation in which a reassessment should occur but is unlikely to do so?"

Between D and E , E is ruled out because reassessments typically occur when they benefit the government and in choice E reassessments does not benefit the government.

Where as in D , Property values have for the most part dropped significantly; yet some have risen slightly.

Govt has for some reason to reassess the properity taxes, but unable to do that because most Property values have for the most part dropped significantly.

Affiliations: Oracle certified java programmer , adobe certified developer
Joined: 14 Jul 2013
Posts: 141
GMAT Date: 02-12-2015
GPA: 3.87
WE: Programming (Telecommunications)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 37

Re: Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per $1,000 [#permalink] ### Show Tags 26 Dec 2014, 01:09 carcass wrote: Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per$1,000 of officially assessed value. Reassessments should be frequent in order to remove distortions that arise when property values change at differential rates. In practice, however, reassessments typically occur when they benefit the government—that is, when their effect is to increase total tax revenue.

If the statements above are true, which of the following describes a situation in which a reassessment should occur but is unlikely to do so?

Property values have risen sharply and uniformly.

Property values have all risen—some very sharply, some less so.

Property values have for the most part risen sharply; yet some have dropped slightly.

Property values have for the most part dropped significantly; yet some have risen slightly.

Property values have dropped significantly and uniformly.

I came across this question today at mba.com and even if I understood the logic behind I do not know how to list this CR

Try it. Thanks

conclusion : rates when increase benefit Govt.- > Govt. then reassessed values
OA: D - rated did not increase -> so no reassessment, but slight increase shows Govt. shd have reassessed
_________________

IF IT IS TO BE , IT IS UP TO ME

Intern
Joined: 13 Jul 2015
Posts: 43
Location: Singapore
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V39
WE: Operations (Retail)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 36

Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per $1,000 [#permalink] ### Show Tags 05 Oct 2015, 22:47 VeritasPrepKarishma wrote: You might have come across mimic questions. You are given a particular argument and you have to find another argument which uses the same logic or you are given a situation and you have to find examples of that situation etc. This is a type of mimic question. Understand the argument: Property taxes are set at a flat rate per$1,000 of officially assessed value.
When property values change at differential rates, reassessment should happen.
In practice, reassessments occur when they increase total tax revenue.

When will total tax revenue increase? When the total assessed value increases.
Reassessments are needed when property values change at differential rates (rates of some properties go up, for some go down or for some go up steeply and for some go up slightly). But they will probably happen only when overall, the reassessed value will be higher than previous value (and when values change at differential rate)

In part D, the values have changed at differential rates so reassessment should happen. But the reassessed value will be lower than the current value so it will probably not happen.

Karishma I really don't get understand this question at all. In option B, if ALL property values have gone up, why would the government even want to do a re-assessment? Their tax revenues will have all increased! Some help please?
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 6830
Location: Pune, India
Followers: 1926

Kudos [?]: 11970 [0], given: 221

Re: Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per $1,000 [#permalink] ### Show Tags 05 Oct 2015, 23:51 SamuelWitwicky wrote: VeritasPrepKarishma wrote: You might have come across mimic questions. You are given a particular argument and you have to find another argument which uses the same logic or you are given a situation and you have to find examples of that situation etc. This is a type of mimic question. Understand the argument: Property taxes are set at a flat rate per$1,000 of officially assessed value.
When property values change at differential rates, reassessment should happen.
In practice, reassessments occur when they increase total tax revenue.

When will total tax revenue increase? When the total assessed value increases.
Reassessments are needed when property values change at differential rates (rates of some properties go up, for some go down or for some go up steeply and for some go up slightly). But they will probably happen only when overall, the reassessed value will be higher than previous value (and when values change at differential rate)

In part D, the values have changed at differential rates so reassessment should happen. But the reassessed value will be lower than the current value so it will probably not happen.

Karishma I really don't get understand this question at all. In option B, if ALL property values have gone up, why would the government even want to do a re-assessment? Their tax revenues will have all increased! Some help please?

There are two different property values - market value and appraised value

Market value is what changes every day and with every deal - e.g. it could be considered the last transaction value of a fair negotiation not committed under duress. Or it could be the average of last 3 transactions or some such formula etc. It is not fixed.

Property tax taken by the govt cannot be calculated using market value because of the huge short term fluctuations. They use assessed value of a property for a certain period of time, say 2 yrs. They can reassess after 2 yrs and then use that as a base. Or they can choose to reassess when they feel that the market price has moved up/down for the long term etc.

The argument tells you how the govt decides to reassess. The property tax will increase if the reassessed value is higher than previous value. An increase in market value does not increase property tax.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for $199 Veritas Prep Reviews Intern Joined: 13 Jul 2015 Posts: 43 Location: Singapore GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V39 WE: Operations (Retail) Followers: 0 Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 36 Re: Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per$1,000 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Oct 2015, 00:15
VeritasPrepKarishma I get it now thanks a lot Karishma. B is definitely wrong then. Government will definitely want to reassess the value of the property because there is potential that the original assessed value is undervalued.
Manager
Joined: 13 Nov 2014
Posts: 52
GMAT 1: 590 Q42 V29
GMAT 2: 630 Q47 V29
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 105

Re: Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per $1,000 [#permalink] ### Show Tags 06 Oct 2015, 19:55 carcass wrote: Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per$1,000 of officially assessed value. Reassessments should be frequent in order to remove distortions that arise when property values change at differential rates. In practice, however, reassessments typically occur when they benefit the government—that is, when their effect is to increase total tax revenue.

If the statements above are true, which of the following describes a situation in which a reassessment should occur but is unlikely to do so?

Property values have risen sharply and uniformly.

Property values have all risen—some very sharply, some less so.

Property values have for the most part risen sharply; yet some have dropped slightly.

Property values have for the most part dropped significantly; yet some have risen slightly.

Property values have dropped significantly and uniformly.

I came across this question today at mba.com and even if I understood the logic behind I do not know how to list this CR

Try it. Thanks

Hi carcass
Can you please explain how D is better than E,
Because if all the property values have dropped then also government is not likely to do the assessment.
_________________

-----------------------------------------
Consider Cudos if you like this post.
-----------------------------------------

Intern
Joined: 13 Jul 2015
Posts: 43
Location: Singapore
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V39
WE: Operations (Retail)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 36

Re: Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per $1,000 [#permalink] ### Show Tags 06 Oct 2015, 20:19 dav90 wrote: carcass wrote: Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per$1,000 of officially assessed value. Reassessments should be frequent in order to remove distortions that arise when property values change at differential rates. In practice, however, reassessments typically occur when they benefit the government—that is, when their effect is to increase total tax revenue.

If the statements above are true, which of the following describes a situation in which a reassessment should occur but is unlikely to do so?

Property values have risen sharply and uniformly.

Property values have all risen—some very sharply, some less so.

Property values have for the most part risen sharply; yet some have dropped slightly.

Property values have for the most part dropped significantly; yet some have risen slightly.

Property values have dropped significantly and uniformly.

I came across this question today at mba.com and even if I understood the logic behind I do not know how to list this CR

Try it. Thanks

Hi carcass
Can you please explain how D is better than E,
Because if all the property values have dropped then also government is not likely to do the assessment.

Karishma from Veritas actually explained it earlier. You should read the post entries before asking the same question. She explained in detail the meaning of "property values change at differential rates"

In summary, reassessments SHOULD occur WHEN property values change at DIFFERENT rates = some decrease by a lot while others decrease/increase by a little = NOT uniform

The problem with E is that the prices dropped uniformly. That's not "differential rates" and therefore reassessment is NOT needed, which does not fulfil the question stem which asks for a scenario in which a reassessment is needed.
Manager
Joined: 30 Jul 2014
Posts: 59
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 52

### Show Tags

23 Jan 2016, 10:34
carcass wrote:
Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per $1,000 of officially assessed value. Reassessments should be frequent in order to remove distortions that arise when property values change at differential rates. In practice, however, reassessments typically occur when they benefit the government—that is, when their effect is to increase total tax revenue. If the statements above are true, which of the following describes a situation in which a reassessment should occur but is unlikely to do so? Property values have risen sharply and uniformly. Property values have all risen—some very sharply, some less so. Property values have for the most part risen sharply; yet some have dropped slightly. Property values have for the most part dropped significantly; yet some have risen slightly. Property values have dropped significantly and uniformly. I came across this question today at mba.com and even if I understood the logic behind I do not know how to list this CR Try it. Thanks Kind of tricky. But good question. ABC are out because the question states it is unlikely to do so - that means total tax revenues would go down. That is the majority of the tax is down. E does not satisfy that it 'reassessment should occur' because it has not risen at all. D is the correct answer. Re: Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per$1,000   [#permalink] 23 Jan 2016, 10:34
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
3 Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per $1,000 of official 2 28 Sep 2014, 23:54 4 Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per$ 1,000 7 22 Aug 2009, 07:37