Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 01 Jul 2015, 17:04

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Proponents of the so-called, 'Flat Tax' often argue that

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
2 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Sep 2010
Posts: 339
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 260 [2] , given: 136

Proponents of the so-called, 'Flat Tax' often argue that [#permalink] New post 27 Dec 2012, 05:37
2
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

64% (02:32) correct 36% (01:59) wrong based on 170 sessions
Proponents of the so-called, 'Flat Tax' often argue that their plans for simplified tax laws will save money through the elimination of much of the complex apparatus currently devoted to enforcing the collection of income taxes. This is a preposterous suggestion since it is obvious that any tax, no matter how simple, will require an enforcement and collection agency to ensure that citizens comply with the law and contribute their required amounts.

The conclusions above would be most strongly supported by which of the following facts, if true?

A. In a survey of present and historical taxation agencies, it is found that there is little relationship between the size of the tax collection agency and the complexity of the tax code it enforces.
B. some flat tax advocates suggest a fixed percentage of an individual' income be collected annually whereas others focus on a value-added tax that is collected at each retail purchase the individual makes.
C. though described as flat, some of these alternative tax proposals actually incorporate considerable complexity.
D. many flat tax proposals depend on the cost savings of a projected reduction in tax collection costs in order to maintain a balanced budget.
E. polls indicate that despite the initial appeal of a simplified tax code, voters are skeptical of flat tax proposals

Request you to please share your reasoning.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

+1 Kudos me, Help me unlocking GMAT Club Tests

Kaplan Promo CodeKnewton GMAT Discount CodesVeritas Prep GMAT Discount Codes
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 24 Sep 2012
Posts: 40
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 76

Re: Proponents of the so-called, 'Flat Tax' - Veritas Test [#permalink] New post 27 Dec 2012, 08:29
hi Himanshu,

The question is asking for...
The conclusions above would be most strongly supported by which of the following facts, if true?

The conclusion of the argument is..."no matter how simple, will require an enforcement and collection agency to ensure that citizens comply with the law and contribute their required amounts."

A. In a survey of present and historical taxation agencies, it is found that there is little relationship between the size of the tax collection agency and the complexity of the tax code it enforces.
This is going against the argument saying there is no relation between collection agency and complexity.
B. some flat tax advocates suggest a fixed percentage of an individual' income be collected annually whereas others focus on a value-added tax that is collected at each retail purchase the individual makes.
Clearly Irrelevant
C. though described as flat, some of these alternative tax proposals actually incorporate considerable complexity.
Out of scope since it is clear that the argument agrees that Flat tax will be simple. Alternative tax proposals out of scope
D. many flat tax proposals depend on the cost savings of a projected reduction in tax collection costs in order to maintain a balanced budget.
Weakens the argument
E. polls indicate that despite the initial appeal of a simplified tax code, voters are skeptical of flat tax proposals
Could be the answer

Waiting for expert opinion. Let us see what others have to say!
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 06 Dec 2012
Posts: 20
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, International Business
GMAT 1: 750 Q45 V49
GPA: 3.92
WE: Education (Non-Profit and Government)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

Re: Proponents of the so-called, 'Flat Tax' - Veritas Test [#permalink] New post 27 Dec 2012, 10:46
imhimanshu wrote:
Proponents of the so-called, 'Flat Tax' often argue that their plans for simplified tax laws will save money through the elimination of much of the complex apparatus currently devoted to enforcing the collection of income taxes. This is a preposterous suggestion since it is obvious that any tax, no matter how simple, will require an enforcement and collection agency to ensure that citizens comply with the law and contribute their required amounts.

The conclusions above would be most strongly supported by which of the following facts, if true?

A. In a survey of present and historical taxation agencies, it is found that there is little relationship between the size of the tax collection agency and the complexity of the tax code it enforces.
B. some flat tax advocates suggest a fixed percentage of an individual' income be collected annually whereas others focus on a value-added tax that is collected at each retail purchase the individual makes.
C. though described as flat, some of these alternative tax proposals actually incorporate considerable complexity.
D. many flat tax proposals depend on the cost savings of a projected reduction in tax collection costs in order to maintain a balanced budget.
E. polls indicate that despite the initial appeal of a simplified tax code, voters are skeptical of flat tax proposals

Request you to please share your reasoning.


A. The main argument here is that the flat tax won't save any money because you still need a way to enforce it. A is the only answer that directly addresses the argument and shows that there would be little to no savings involved in a flat tax system.
Expert Post
2 KUDOS received
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 5681
Location: Pune, India
Followers: 1413

Kudos [?]: 7318 [2] , given: 186

Re: Proponents of the so-called, 'Flat Tax' - Veritas Test [#permalink] New post 27 Dec 2012, 21:58
2
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
imhimanshu wrote:
Proponents of the so-called, 'Flat Tax' often argue that their plans for simplified tax laws will save money through the elimination of much of the complex apparatus currently devoted to enforcing the collection of income taxes. This is a preposterous suggestion since it is obvious that any tax, no matter how simple, will require an enforcement and collection agency to ensure that citizens comply with the law and contribute their required amounts.

The conclusions above would be most strongly supported by which of the following facts, if true?

A. In a survey of present and historical taxation agencies, it is found that there is little relationship between the size of the tax collection agency and the complexity of the tax code it enforces.
B. some flat tax advocates suggest a fixed percentage of an individual' income be collected annually whereas others focus on a value-added tax that is collected at each retail purchase the individual makes.
C. though described as flat, some of these alternative tax proposals actually incorporate considerable complexity.
D. many flat tax proposals depend on the cost savings of a projected reduction in tax collection costs in order to maintain a balanced budget.
E. polls indicate that despite the initial appeal of a simplified tax code, voters are skeptical of flat tax proposals

Request you to please share your reasoning.


Question Stem: The conclusions above would be most strongly supported by which of the following facts, if true?

It is a strengthen question. You need to look for the option that strengthens the conclusion of the argument.

What is the conclusion?

Conclusion: "This is a preposterous suggestion since it is obvious that any tax, no matter how simple, will require an enforcement and collection agency to ensure that citizens comply with the law and contribute their required amounts"
Any tax, simple or complicated, will require an enforcement and collection agency so costs will not go down.

What will strengthen this conclusion?
Something that says that any kind of tax will have similar agency costs.

Look at the options:

A. In a survey of present and historical taxation agencies, it is found that there is little relationship between the size of the tax collection agency and the complexity of the tax code it enforces.

If the size of the tax collection agency stays the same, chances are that the cost will stay the same too. Hence, the cost may not depend on the complexity of the tax code. It does strengthen the argument. Answer.

B. some flat tax advocates suggest a fixed percentage of an individual' income be collected annually whereas others focus on a value-added tax that is collected at each retail purchase the individual makes.

Irrelevant to the argument how the flat tax is calculated.

C. though described as flat, some of these alternative tax proposals actually incorporate considerable complexity.

Again, irrelevant. We need to figure out whether simplified tax laws will reduce cost.

D. many flat tax proposals depend on the cost savings of a projected reduction in tax collection costs in order to maintain a balanced budget.

Irrelevant to the argument. The structure of flat tax doesn't concern us.

E. polls indicate that despite the initial appeal of a simplified tax code, voters are skeptical of flat tax proposals

Irrelevant. It doesn't matter how voters feel.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for $199

Veritas Prep Reviews

GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 4361
Followers: 470

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: Proponents of the so-called, 'Flat Tax' often argue that [#permalink] New post 28 Jan 2015, 19:59
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: Proponents of the so-called, 'Flat Tax' often argue that   [#permalink] 28 Jan 2015, 19:59
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 Experts publish their posts in the topic Proponents of airline industry deregulation argued that airl kalravaibhav 5 08 Sep 2013, 09:23
17 Experts publish their posts in the topic Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per $1,000 carcass 10 05 Nov 2012, 16:27
3 Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per $ 1,000 rohansherry 6 22 Aug 2009, 06:37
1 Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per $ 1,000 bsd_lover 8 05 May 2008, 21:54
So-called environmentalists have argued that the proposed eyunni 14 24 Sep 2007, 12:45
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Proponents of the so-called, 'Flat Tax' often argue that

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.