Provinces and states with stringent car safety requirements, : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club App Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

It is currently 03 Dec 2016, 09:48
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Provinces and states with stringent car safety requirements,

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
avatar
Joined: 23 Oct 2011
Posts: 283
Followers: 35

Kudos [?]: 738 [0], given: 21

Premium Member
Provinces and states with stringent car safety requirements, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Jul 2012, 11:32
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  35% (medium)

Question Stats:

67% (02:13) correct 33% (01:13) wrong based on 341 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Provinces and states with stringent car safety requirements, including required use of seat belts and annual safety inspections, have on average higher rates of accidents per kilometer driven than do provinces and states with less stringent requirements. Nevertheless, most highway safety experts agree that more stringent requirements do reduce accident rates. Which one of the following, if true, most helps to reconcile the safety experts’ belief with the apparently contrary evidence described above?

A. Annual safety inspections ensure that car tires are replaced before they grow old.
B. Drivers often become overconfident after their cars have passed a thorough safety inspection.
C. The roads in provinces and states with stringent car safety programs are far more congested and therefore dangerous than in other provinces and states.
D. Psychological studies show that drivers who regularly wear seat belts often come to think of themselves as serious drivers, which for a few people discourages reckless driving.
E. Provinces and states with stringent car safety requirements have, on average, many more kilometers of roads then do other provinces and states.



Main CR Qs link - cr-qs-600-700-level-131508.html
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

********************
Push +1 kudos button please, if you like my post.

Request Expert Reply
If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
Retired Moderator
User avatar
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1712
Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Followers: 95

Kudos [?]: 887 [0], given: 109

Re: Provinces and states with stringent car safety requirements, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Jul 2012, 17:14
+1 C

If the likelihood of being in an car accident were the same in both type of provinces, we would see that the rate of accidents in the provice with stricter laws would be lower. But this is not the case.

There are different contexts with different probabilities of being in an accident that explain this paradox.
_________________

"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."

My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: http://gmatclub.com/forum/my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 May 2012
Posts: 69
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 3

Re: Provinces and states with stringent car safety requirements, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Jul 2012, 20:02
Good Question. What is the reason why the option D is ignored ?
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Jan 2011
Posts: 201
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 22

Re: Provinces and states with stringent car safety requirements, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Jul 2012, 07:35
a) Annual safety inspections ensure that car tires are replaced before they grow old. - Irrelavant - Incorrect

b) Drivers often become overconfident after their cars have passed a thorough safety inspection.
c) The roads in provinces and states with stringent car safety programs are far more congested and therefore dangerous than in other provinces and states.

d) Psychological studies show that drivers who regularly wear seat belts often come to think of themselves as serious drivers, which for a few people discourages reckless driving. - If serious driving discourages rekless driving, then there is no reason for accidents to occur. Hence Incorrect answer
e) Provinces and states with stringent car safety requirements have, on average, many more kilometers of roads then do other provinces and states. - Does not automatically prove anything - Incorrect


b) Drivers often become overconfident after their cars have passed a thorough safety inspection. - This seems valid answer. Since the stringent safety measures are met, there is a possibility that drivers become reckless and think they are invincible. -- Would like to know if my reason of thinking is incorrect.

c) The roads in provinces and states with stringent car safety programs are far more congested and therefore dangerous than in other provinces and states. - Since states with stringent safety programs are more congested, there might me minor accident because of close encounters with other drivers. - Seems like a correct answer.

Between B and C, I would choose B.
I would like to hear others thoughts and line of reasoning.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Jun 2010
Posts: 368
Schools: IE'14, ISB'14, Kellogg'15
WE 1: 7 Yrs in Automobile (Commercial Vehicle industry)
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 365 [0], given: 50

Reviews Badge
Re: Provinces and states with stringent car safety requirements, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Jul 2012, 07:45
Between B & C, I will go with C.

As Sidhu pointed in his explanatin that there is a possibility that driver may be overconfident and become reckless. It will definitely cause accidents. Ok, we can accept this statement, however this statement or the possibility of accidents does not clarify concisely why accidents per Kms will increase.

Whereas option C is very straight forward and clearly addresses the issue in preceding argument.
_________________

Regards
SD
-----------------------------
Press Kudos if you like my post.
Debrief 610-540-580-710(Long Journey): http://gmatclub.com/forum/from-600-540-580-710-finally-achieved-in-4th-attempt-142456.html

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 31 Aug 2012
Posts: 11
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Finance
Schools: Sloan '15
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V34
WE: Architecture (Telecommunications)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 11 [1] , given: 7

Re: Provinces and states with stringent car safety requirements, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Nov 2012, 02:33
1
This post received
KUDOS
Guys, the question does not ask us to explain the contradiction. If the question asked us to explain contradiction, both B and C would be equally correct.
But the question is why would security experts agree for stringent rules, despite the contradiction that states with stringent rule have more accidents.

In case of B, drivers become overconfident and hence security experts would not favor Stringent rules.
In case of C, the paradox is explained and the explanation does not blame stringent rules for the accidents so security experts might agree with stringent rules. Hope this helps.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10434
Followers: 882

Kudos [?]: 191 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: Provinces and states with stringent car safety requirements, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Sep 2016, 05:14
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: Provinces and states with stringent car safety requirements,   [#permalink] 30 Sep 2016, 05:14
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
6 A proposal for a new building fire safety code requires that fire-ret carcass 3 23 Feb 2016, 08:43
11 Experts publish their posts in the topic Many critics claim that federally mandated car safety sajini 7 17 Sep 2012, 04:12
The state legislature has proposed a law that would require agdimple333 8 06 Jul 2011, 09:27
4 Experts publish their posts in the topic State X spends more money on highway safety and maintenance dixitraghav 19 15 Dec 2010, 17:38
The state legislature has proposed a law that would require suntaurian 7 02 Mar 2008, 20:38
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Provinces and states with stringent car safety requirements,

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.