ps - food : PS Archive
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 18 Jan 2017, 09:48

# STARTING SOON:

Open Admission Chat with MBA Experts of Personal MBA Coach - Join Chat Room to Participate.

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# ps - food

Author Message
VP
Joined: 30 Sep 2004
Posts: 1488
Location: Germany
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 327 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

26 Dec 2005, 10:55
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

This topic is locked. If you want to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum.

if a kind of packaged food increase 40% of its quantity and the price x remains constant, the customer can economize how much when buy one ounce of such food?
_________________

If your mind can conceive it and your heart can believe it, have faith that you can achieve it.

VP
Joined: 22 Aug 2005
Posts: 1120
Location: CA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 102 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

26 Dec 2005, 12:51
2/7 or 28%

let:
q : initial quatity purchased in $x thus 1.4q = new quantity in$x

economise = old price/ounce - new price / ounce
= x/q - x/(1.4q) = 2/7 x/q = 2/7 of original price/ounce
_________________

Whether you think you can or think you can't. You're right! - Henry Ford (1863 - 1947)

SVP
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 1731
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 74 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

26 Dec 2005, 16:41
duttsit wrote:
2/7 or 28%

let:
q : initial quatity purchased in $x thus 1.4q = new quantity in$x

economise = old price/ounce - new price / ounce
= x/q - x/(1.4q) = 2/7 x/q = 2/7 of original price/ounce

go with dutt, confirm and lock it.
SVP
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1810
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 136 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

26 Dec 2005, 19:09
duttsit wrote:
2/7 or 28%

let:
q : initial quatity purchased in $x thus 1.4q = new quantity in$x

economise = old price/ounce - new price / ounce
= x/q - x/(1.4q) = 2/7 x/q = 2/7 of original price/ounce

Very elegantly solved. I was waiting for my light to get lit. Duttsit rocks
SVP
Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Posts: 1890
Followers: 19

Kudos [?]: 292 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

26 Dec 2005, 19:24
duttsit wrote:
2/7 or 28%

let:
q : initial quatity purchased in $x thus 1.4q = new quantity in$x

economise = old price/ounce - new price / ounce
= x/q - x/(1.4q) = 2/7 x/q = 2/7 of original price/ounce

yup, really elegent and ........cute
26 Dec 2005, 19:24
Display posts from previous: Sort by