Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 17 Jun 2013, 22:12
Customize  |  Hide

ps- number of integers

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
Intern
Intern
Joined: 07 Sep 2008
Posts: 25
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

ps- number of integers [#permalink] New post 06 Oct 2008, 16:06
00:00

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
what is the total number of integers between 100 and 200 that are divisible by 3?

ans:33
SVP
SVP
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1592
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 132 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: ps- number of integers [#permalink] New post 07 Oct 2008, 00:00
My approach:

3 * 33 = 99
3 * 66 = 198

Hence, number of integers between 100 and 200 and divisible by 3 will be 66-33 = 33.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 07 Sep 2008
Posts: 25
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: ps- number of integers [#permalink] New post 07 Oct 2008, 05:59
Thank you both. I don't really understand neither of these two answers.

Why you multiply 3 x 33 and then 3 x 66?
Intern
Intern
Joined: 07 Sep 2008
Posts: 25
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: ps- number of integers [#permalink] New post 07 Oct 2008, 06:02
can you please explain your reasoning behind this? Why 198-102/3 and not 200-100/3?

ritula wrote:
(198-102)/3 +1=33

andreasonlinegr wrote:
what is the total number of integers between 100 and 200 that are divisible by 3?

ans:33
1 KUDOS received
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 05 Jul 2006
Posts: 1565
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 65 [1] , given: 37

CAT Tests
Re: ps- number of integers [#permalink] New post 07 Oct 2008, 10:18
1
This post received
KUDOS
[quote="andreasonlinegr"]can you please explain your reasoning behind this? Why 198-102/3 and not 200-100/3?

the first and the last multiples of 3 in the given range

however you can still use 200-100/3 = 33.3333 ( the number of multiples cant be a fraction thus still answer is 33.

if the result is 33.9 still only 33 multiples of 3 are there
SVP
SVP
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1592
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 132 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: ps- number of integers [#permalink] New post 08 Oct 2008, 01:45
andreasonlinegr wrote:
Thank you both. I don't really understand neither of these two answers.

Why you multiply 3 x 33 and then 3 x 66?


The first number that will be in the range of 100-200 and divisible by 3 will be 3*34. Similarly, the last such number will be 3*66.

In orde to take into account the first number, I should consider the number before 100 that is divisible by 3 and that is why 3*33.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 30 Sep 2008
Posts: 10
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: ps- number of integers [#permalink] New post 08 Oct 2008, 13:47
yezz wrote:
andreasonlinegr wrote:
can you please explain your reasoning behind this? Why 198-102/3 and not 200-100/3?

the first and the last multiples of 3 in the given range

however you can still use 200-100/3 = 33.3333 ( the number of multiples cant be a fraction thus still answer is 33.

if the result is 33.9 still only 33 multiples of 3 are there


Dumb question: Why take multiples, subtract them and then divide by 3? Is there a formula for that?
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 05 Jul 2006
Posts: 1565
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 65 [0], given: 37

CAT Tests
Re: ps- number of integers [#permalink] New post 08 Oct 2008, 14:08
piper wrote:
yezz wrote:
andreasonlinegr wrote:
can you please explain your reasoning behind this? Why 198-102/3 and not 200-100/3?

the first and the last multiples of 3 in the given range

however you can still use 200-100/3 = 33.3333 ( the number of multiples cant be a fraction thus still answer is 33.

if the result is 33.9 still only 33 multiples of 3 are there


Dumb question: Why take multiples, subtract them and then divide by 3? Is there a formula for that?


every 3 consecutive intigers has a multiple of 3 ..... right??

when you subtract the higher and lower values in the given range you get the total no on intigers in that range......right

then when u devide that number by 3 ( from every 3 consecutive initgers there is a multiple of 3 above ) you will know how many ( groups of 3 consecutives are there and hence you will no the number of multiples of 3)

hope i am clear
Intern
Intern
Joined: 30 Sep 2008
Posts: 10
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: ps- number of integers [#permalink] New post 08 Oct 2008, 14:34
yezz wrote:
every 3 consecutive intigers has a multiple of 3 ..... right??

when you subtract the higher and lower values in the given range you get the total no on intigers in that range......right

then when u devide that number by 3 ( from every 3 consecutive initgers there is a multiple of 3 above ) you will know how many ( groups of 3 consecutives are there and hence you will no the number of multiples of 3)

hope i am clear


Wow, beautifully explained! Thank you.
Re: ps- number of integers   [#permalink] 08 Oct 2008, 14:34
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts PS NUMBER mandy 1 09 Jun 2005, 02:33
New posts PS- integers and number properties Dadeesgurly04 9 07 Jan 2006, 17:43
New posts PS-numbers LM 4 24 Jun 2007, 21:02
New posts PS-Numbers vivektripathi 3 07 Dec 2008, 07:33
New posts PS -Numbers ALD 2 08 Jan 2009, 11:17
Display posts from previous: Sort by

ps- number of integers

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.