PS-Prep, time killer : PS Archive
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 16 Jan 2017, 18:26

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# PS-Prep, time killer

Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Nov 2006
Posts: 321
Location: Orange County, CA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 113 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

28 Jun 2007, 08:19
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

This topic is locked. If you want to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum.

Any suggestions for a quicker answer?

I was taking too long determining sign changes and adding / subtracting between each item (1-10) and ended up just guessing in order to move onto the next problem.

Looking for ways to cut down time on easy questions like this.
Attachments

Quant_time eater_20070628.doc [60 KiB]

VP
Joined: 08 Jun 2005
Posts: 1146
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 189 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

28 Jun 2007, 09:38
using Geometric Progression formula is shorter but easy to make mistakes:

Sn = a(1-R^n)/(1-R)

n = 10
a = 1/2

F(1) = 1/2
F(2) = -1/4
F(3) = 1/8

hence R = -1/2

solve GP

Sn = 1/2*(1-(-1/2^10))/(1-(-1/2))

Sn = (1025/2048)/(3/2)

Sn = 2050/2048/3

Sn = ~1/3

CIO
Joined: 09 Mar 2003
Posts: 463
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 58 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

28 Jun 2007, 11:06
misterJJ2u wrote:
Any suggestions for a quicker answer?

I was taking too long determining sign changes and adding / subtracting between each item (1-10) and ended up just guessing in order to move onto the next problem.

Looking for ways to cut down time on easy questions like this.

Also D. 1 minute.

1. Find pattern. There has to be one, otherwise it wouldn't be a GMAT question. Very quickly see that this thing is just alternating positive and negative powers of 1/2:
1/2, -1/4, 1/8, -1/16....

2. Every change is smaller than the previous one. Classic GMAT game. I drew a number line:

-|---------------------|----------------------|
0 ....................... 1/4 ..................... 1/2

Numbers start at 1/2, then down 1/4, then up 1/8, then down 1/16. You basically bounce back and fourth, but you NEVER cross 1/4, and you never cross 1/2.

-|---------------------|----------------------|
0 ....................... 1/4 ..................... 1/2
...................................................... Start
............................ {---------------------- ....(Back 1/4)
............................. ------------} ...............(forward 1/8)
......................................{----- ................(back 1/16)
.......................................---} .................(forward 1/32)
....................................... {- .................. (back 1/64)

Etc, etc. It's a lot here to type out, on paper, really simple. Either way, you can see the range you're in pretty clearly.
VP
Joined: 08 Jun 2005
Posts: 1146
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 189 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

28 Jun 2007, 11:25
ian7777 wrote:
misterJJ2u wrote:
Any suggestions for a quicker answer?

I was taking too long determining sign changes and adding / subtracting between each item (1-10) and ended up just guessing in order to move onto the next problem.

Looking for ways to cut down time on easy questions like this.

Also D. 1 minute.

1. Find pattern. There has to be one, otherwise it wouldn't be a GMAT question. Very quickly see that this thing is just alternating positive and negative powers of 1/2:
1/2, -1/4, 1/8, -1/16....

2. Every change is smaller than the previous one. Classic GMAT game. I drew a number line:

-|---------------------|----------------------|
0 ....................... 1/4 ..................... 1/2

Numbers start at 1/2, then down 1/4, then up 1/8, then down 1/16. You basically bounce back and fourth, but you NEVER cross 1/4, and you never cross 1/2.

-|---------------------|----------------------|
0 ....................... 1/4 ..................... 1/2
...................................................... Start
............................ {---------------------- ....(Back 1/4)
............................. ------------} ...............(forward 1/8)
......................................{----- ................(back 1/16)
.......................................---} .................(forward 1/32)
....................................... {- .................. (back 1/64)

Etc, etc. It's a lot here to type out, on paper, really simple. Either way, you can see the range you're in pretty clearly.

Nice ! - Thanks for your help - I'm guessing its a lot of work to write it all down. A true and elegant solution.

Director
Joined: 26 Feb 2006
Posts: 904
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 107 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

28 Jun 2007, 11:33
ian7777 wrote:
misterJJ2u wrote:
Any suggestions for a quicker answer?

I was taking too long determining sign changes and adding / subtracting between each item (1-10) and ended up just guessing in order to move onto the next problem.

Looking for ways to cut down time on easy questions like this.

Also D. 1 minute.

1. Find pattern. There has to be one, otherwise it wouldn't be a GMAT question. Very quickly see that this thing is just alternating positive and negative powers of 1/2:
1/2, -1/4, 1/8, -1/16....

2. Every change is smaller than the previous one. Classic GMAT game. I drew a number line:

-|---------------------|----------------------|
0 ....................... 1/4 ..................... 1/2

Numbers start at 1/2, then down 1/4, then up 1/8, then down 1/16. You basically bounce back and fourth, but you NEVER cross 1/4, and you never cross 1/2.

-|---------------------|----------------------|
0 ....................... 1/4 ..................... 1/2
...................................................... Start
............................ {---------------------- ....(Back 1/4)
............................. ------------} ...............(forward 1/8)
......................................{----- ................(back 1/16)
.......................................---} .................(forward 1/32)
....................................... {- .................. (back 1/64)

Etc, etc. It's a lot here to type out, on paper, really simple. Either way, you can see the range you're in pretty clearly.

wonderful approach..

btw, i got 341/1024 using my lengthy approach..
Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Nov 2006
Posts: 321
Location: Orange County, CA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 113 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

28 Jun 2007, 11:55
Quote:

Also D. 1 minute.

1. Find pattern. There has to be one, otherwise it wouldn't be a GMAT question. Very quickly see that this thing is just alternating positive and negative powers of 1/2:
1/2, -1/4, 1/8, -1/16....

2. Every change is smaller than the previous one. Classic GMAT game. I drew a number line:

-|---------------------|----------------------|
0 ....................... 1/4 ..................... 1/2

Numbers start at 1/2, then down 1/4, then up 1/8, then down 1/16. You basically bounce back and fourth, but you NEVER cross 1/4, and you never cross 1/2.

-|---------------------|----------------------|
0 ....................... 1/4 ..................... 1/2
...................................................... Start
............................ {---------------------- ....(Back 1/4)
............................. ------------} ...............(forward 1/8)
......................................{----- ................(back 1/16)
.......................................---} .................(forward 1/32)
....................................... {- .................. (back 1/64)

Etc, etc. It's a lot here to type out, on paper, really simple. Either way, you can see the range you're in pretty clearly.

Thanks Ian. That's exactly what I was looking for. I figured there was some easier way. Now I just have to be able to find it and apply it on test day!
Manager
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 235
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

28 Jun 2007, 12:25
my aproach to this question:

first try 3 consecutive numbers

for k =1 : 0.5
for k=2 : -0.25
for k=3 : 0.125

so we have a geometric progression with ratio 1/-2....with this you can get your answer in less than 1minut
28 Jun 2007, 12:25
Display posts from previous: Sort by