|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1635
Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Followers: 25
Kudos [?]:
118
[1] , given: 2
|
Psychologists conducted a series of experiments to test the [#permalink]
19 Aug 2009, 13:57
1
This post received KUDOS
Question Stats:
25% (01:41) correct
75% (02:15) wrong based on 0 sessions
Psychologists conducted a series of experiments to test the effect upon schoolchildren of violence in films. In the first experiment, grammar school children were shown a film that included scenes of a male teenager engaging in violent acts against others, such as punching, pushing, and kicking. During a free-play session following the film viewing, 42 percent of the children were observed to engage in one or more violent acts similar to those in the film. In a second experiment, a different group of children was shown a similar film featuring a female teenager. Only 14 percent of the children were observed behaving violently afterward. The psychologists concluded that children are more likely to imitate violent behavior on film when a male model is shown than when a female model is shown. Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the psychologists’ conclusion? (A) In both experiments, the victims of the filmed violence included both males and females. (B) In the second experiment, 28 percent of the children appeared upset during the viewing the violent film scenes. (C) The first group included 19 male students and 20 female students; the second group included 20 male students and 21 female students. (D) In the first group, 58 percent of the children appeared bored during the showing of the film, and 12 percent fell asleep. (E) The percentage of children known to have discipline problems prior to the experiment was greater in the first group than in the second group.
_________________
The sky is the limit 800 is the limit
Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 22 Jun 2009
Posts: 3
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 1
|
Re: Psychologists conducted [#permalink]
19 Aug 2009, 20:18
IMO (E)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 26 Aug 2005
Posts: 60
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
4
[0], given: 0
|
Re: Psychologists conducted [#permalink]
19 Aug 2009, 23:16
another vote for (e) by POE
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 26 May 2009
Posts: 317
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
33
[0], given: 13
|
Re: Psychologists conducted [#permalink]
19 Aug 2009, 23:46
+1 for E
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Posts: 316
Followers: 4
Kudos [?]:
157
[1] , given: 9
|
Re: Psychologists conducted [#permalink]
20 Aug 2009, 00:30
1
This post received KUDOS
one more vote for E. Here's my line of reasoning.
This stimulus falls into a common reasoning pattern in which the author concludes that because two groups of people, one that is supplied with a product whereas the other is not, present differences between them. The author attributes this differences to the product but does not consider that the differences might have already been there before the supply.
As a analogy consider a product that claims to make people loose weight. Consider two groups of people. People in group 1 weight less than people in group 2. People in group 1 take the product for 6 weeks after of which they weight less than people in group 2. The study concludes that the product caused that lost in weight. This is clearly flawed.
Regarding the stimulus
A) In both experiments, the victims of the filmed violence included both males and females. This answer address the victims of the filmed that is not discussed in the stimulus. out B) In the second experiment, 28 percent of the children appeared upset during the viewing the violent film scenes. For this to weaken the argument you have to assume that when people view a film while they are upset the film does not influence them. Since we cannot make that assumption, we can rule B out.
(C) The first group included 19 male students and 20 female students; the second group included 20 male students and 21 female students. The stimulus talks about percentages so raw numbers are useless D) In the first group, 58 percent of the children appeared bored during the showing of the film, and 12 percent fell asleep. That the children did not like the film does not weaken that the film influenced them. (E) The percentage of children known to have discipline problems prior to the experiment was greater in the first group than in the second group. This states that the groups were different prior to the experiment. Correct
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Jul 2009
Posts: 359
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
18
[0], given: 32
|
Re: Psychologists conducted [#permalink]
20 Aug 2009, 01:34
E.
Weakens the explanation [male vs female] by offering another explanation [1st group vs 2nd group] for the difference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Jul 2009
Posts: 270
Location: New York, NY
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
26
[0], given: 23
|
Re: Psychologists conducted [#permalink]
28 Aug 2009, 14:03
E The expriment was not good because the two groups were not alike. Posted from my mobile device
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 07 Jul 2009
Posts: 230
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
28
[0], given: 13
|
Re: Psychologists conducted [#permalink]
28 Aug 2009, 14:18
Straight E. If we have a biased group, then reasoning doesn't stand a chance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 28 Aug 2009
Posts: 197
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
30
[0], given: 1
|
Re: Psychologists conducted [#permalink]
05 Sep 2009, 16:36
mikeCoolBoy wrote: one more vote for E. Here's my line of reasoning.
This stimulus falls into a common reasoning pattern in which the author concludes that because two groups of people, one that is supplied with a product whereas the other is not, present differences between them. The author attributes this differences to the product but does not consider that the differences might have already been there before the supply.
As a analogy consider a product that claims to make people loose weight. Consider two groups of people. People in group 1 weight less than people in group 2. People in group 1 take the product for 6 weeks after of which they weight less than people in group 2. The study concludes that the product caused that lost in weight. This is clearly flawed.
Regarding the stimulus
A) In both experiments, the victims of the filmed violence included both males and females. This answer address the victims of the filmed that is not discussed in the stimulus. out B) In the second experiment, 28 percent of the children appeared upset during the viewing the violent film scenes. For this to weaken the argument you have to assume that when people view a film while they are upset the film does not influence them. Since we cannot make that assumption, we can rule B out.
(C) The first group included 19 male students and 20 female students; the second group included 20 male students and 21 female students. The stimulus talks about percentages so raw numbers are useless D) In the first group, 58 percent of the children appeared bored during the showing of the film, and 12 percent fell asleep. That the children did not like the film does not weaken that the film influenced them. (E) The percentage of children known to have discipline problems prior to the experiment was greater in the first group than in the second group. This states that the groups were different prior to the experiment. Correct good explanations
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Posts: 316
Followers: 4
Kudos [?]:
157
[0], given: 9
|
Re: Psychologists conducted [#permalink]
05 Sep 2009, 19:44
Thank you, I always try to do my best. That people sometimes like my explanations encourages me to keep posting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1635
Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Followers: 25
Kudos [?]:
118
[0], given: 2
|
Re: Psychologists conducted [#permalink]
09 Sep 2009, 14:08
The point is that E implies that the 2 groups are different so the conclusion can not be made or that the discipline problems of the first groups also imply more violence among that group so is logical to conclude that group to be more violent?
_________________
The sky is the limit 800 is the limit
Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Jul 2009
Posts: 305
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
20
[0], given: 6
|
Re: Psychologists conducted [#permalink]
09 Sep 2009, 17:47
i think it implies the two groups are different and that is enough...because you cant use two different groups to argue the same thing...well to say the first group has more discipline problems also suggest they might have a higher chance of behaving violently...
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1635
Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Followers: 25
Kudos [?]:
118
[0], given: 2
|
Re: Psychologists conducted [#permalink]
10 Sep 2009, 11:16
sprtng wrote: i think it implies the two groups are different and that is enough...because you cant use two different groups to argue the same thing...well to say the first group has more discipline problems also suggest they might have a higher chance of behaving violently... discipline problems-->more violence, for me is assuming to much
_________________
The sky is the limit 800 is the limit
Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Jul 2009
Posts: 305
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
20
[0], given: 6
|
Re: Psychologists conducted [#permalink]
10 Sep 2009, 11:46
noboru wrote: sprtng wrote: i think it implies the two groups are different and that is enough...because you cant use two different groups to argue the same thing...well to say the first group has more discipline problems also suggest they might have a higher chance of behaving violently... discipline problems-->more violence, for me is assuming to much what it's implying here is that these are two different groups. of course the reaction might be different.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 08 Oct 2010
Posts: 216
Location: Uzbekistan
Schools: Johnson, Fuqua, Simon, Mendoza
WE 3: 10
Followers: 7
Kudos [?]:
103
[0], given: 974
|
Re: Psychologists conducted [#permalink]
15 Dec 2010, 05:58
the initial contents of both groups were not equal, i.e. the first group has had health problems which does effect results of the expetiment. Hence: E
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Student
Status: Bring the Rain
Joined: 17 Aug 2010
Posts: 410
Location: United States (MD)
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
Schools: Michigan (Ross) - Class of 2014
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V39
GPA: 3.13
WE: Corporate Finance (Aerospace and Defense)
Followers: 6
Kudos [?]:
42
[0], given: 46
|
Re: Psychologists conducted [#permalink]
15 Dec 2010, 08:13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Psychologists conducted
[#permalink]
15 Dec 2010, 08:13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, RaviChandra, Marcab, Narenn
|