Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 31 Oct 2014, 14:52

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

pure acquariums and zoos

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 21 Sep 2004
Posts: 619
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

pure acquariums and zoos [#permalink] New post 31 Jan 2005, 17:34
In the United States, vacationers account for more than half of all visitors to what are technically called “pure aquariumsâ€
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5095
Location: Singapore
Followers: 19

Kudos [?]: 155 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 31 Jan 2005, 18:06
1. In US, vacationers account for > 1/2 visitors to pure aquariums
2. But vacationers accout for < 1/2 of all visitors to zoo
3. zoo also have a 'aquarium' of modest scope

All three are premises, and no conclusion is given in the passage.
The limiter here is vacationers to US. So (A) is out, as it is referring to local residents, which is not touched on in the passage.
Neither are we told about distribution of zoos and aquariums between differents sized metropolitan areas. So (B) is out.
(C) tells us there are more pure aquariums than zoos, but doesn't go further to indicate that this is equated to more visitors. (C) is out.
(D) will be a good choice since it gives a reason why people are more likely to end up at a aquarium than at a zoo, and this could account for the difference in numbers.
(E) is out of scope.

(D) is my choice.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 21 Sep 2004
Posts: 619
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 31 Jan 2005, 18:30
any more tries
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 29 Oct 2004
Posts: 865
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 31 Jan 2005, 20:11
(B)
classic number-percentage problem
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 25 Jan 2004
Posts: 728
Location: Milwaukee
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 31 Jan 2005, 20:59
B it is

more cities have zoo means more people go to Zoo
_________________

Praveen

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 2251
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 205 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 31 Jan 2005, 21:35
(B).

It's a local visit vs vocasional visit issue. Most cities has their own zoo, so they don't have to go somewehere else to visit a zoo. However more people need to go somewhere else to visit an aquarium since they don't have a local one, and they count as vocasional visits.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 21 Sep 2004
Posts: 619
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 01 Feb 2005, 06:01
OA is B. thank you guys.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 03 Nov 2004
Posts: 193
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 18 Feb 2005, 00:18
talking about scope of the argument,

1) how can US be taken as only metropolitan cities. does the vacationers come to the cities only. why not towns, villages and coastal areas.

2) nothing is mentioned about the origin of vacationers,then how can one assume that the local population is vacationers in case of pure aquarium, but local residents in case of zoo. (hong hu how can you assume this)

please clarify
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 2251
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 205 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 18 Feb 2005, 11:05
1) You can safely assume that more people visit large cities than small cities and towns. And if it is true for big cities with zoos, it would be more true for small cities with zoos.

2) What I was trying to say is that a lot of people who live in a city that has a zoo but not an aquarium may choose to go to another city to visit an aquarium. Or they may be more likely to choose to visit an aquarium when they are on vacation in a city with an aquarium, than to visit a zoo, because they have already visited their local zoo many times. If that is the case, then their visit to their local zoo would be counted as local visits, and their visit to an aquarium when they are on vacation would be counted as vocational visits.
  [#permalink] 18 Feb 2005, 11:05
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 In a zoo, the ratio of the number of cheetahs to the number farukqmul 3 07 Jul 2012, 21:52
12 Experts publish their posts in the topic In a state of pure commercial competition, there would be a hfbamafan 15 20 Apr 2012, 03:06
Advice for pure listening pleasure shrouded1 6 30 Sep 2010, 13:14
1 Elephant in Whipsnade zoo over2u 4 30 Aug 2009, 02:22
Zoo animal induced allergies icandy 7 05 Feb 2009, 17:07
Display posts from previous: Sort by

pure acquariums and zoos

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.