Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

The question asks whether the product of four variables will be 1. The variables are completely unqualified, so to answer this question something must be known about each variable.

Statement (1) provides a relationship between three of the variables so it is insufficient.

Statement (2) provides a relationship between three of the variables so it is insufficient.

This eliminates three answers choices.

Taken together the Statements do provide information about all four variables, but is that information enough? Let's use the Schrute test.

Dwight Schrute once said, "Whenever I'm about to do something, I think, "Would an idiot do that?" And if they would, I do not do that thing."

Let's modify this for the GMAT: "Whenever I'm about to pick an answer, I think, "Would a typical GMAT taker pick that answer?"And if they would, I do not pick that answer."

Would a typical GMAT taker think that Statements (1) and (2) were sufficient? Yes, he would. Therefore we must pick TOGETHER NOT sufficient.

Statement 1 says abc = 1. It doesn't say anything about d, so insufficient

Statement 2 says bcd = 1. It doesn't say anything about a, so insufficient

Combining 1 and 2, we get a(bc)(bc)d=1

or abcd*bc = 1

Now abcd would be 1 only if bc = 1, but neither 1 nor 2 nor them combined can definitely tell us that bc = 1. Fore.g., bc can be 1/2 and a=2 and d = 2 and both statements can be satisfied. So, answer should be E

The question asks whether the product of four variables will be 1. The variables are completely unqualified, so to answer this question something must be known about each variable.

I've seen prep company representatives repeat this idea in many places, and it's mathematical nonsense. If you change your question to:

Does abcd = 0? (1) abc = 0 (2) bcd = 0

then you certainly do not need to know 'about each variable' to answer the question; the answer is D even though we don't know the value of any of the variables. There are many official DS questions with multiple unknowns which follow a similar pattern - the question asks for the value of some combination of unknowns, and while you cannot determine the value of the unknowns themselves, you can still answer the question. Q168 in the DS section of OG12 is one of many examples.

spacelandprep wrote:

Let's modify this for the GMAT: "Whenever I'm about to pick an answer, I think, "Would a typical GMAT taker pick that answer?"And if they would, I do not pick that answer."

There are many GMAT questions which are genuinely simple. Applying this test to real GMAT questions could easily lead a test taker to 'outsmart' him or herself, and pick the wrong answer rather than the correct one. While I agree one should be suspicious of 'obvious' answers in DS, the safest thing for the test taker to do is to understand the math involved, rather than apply gimmicky 'tricks' which will only give you the right answer some of the time.
_________________

GMAT Tutor in Toronto

If you are looking for online GMAT math tutoring, or if you are interested in buying my advanced Quant books and problem sets, please contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

The question asks whether the product of four variables will be 1. The variables are completely unqualified, so to answer this question something must be known about each variable.

I've seen prep company representatives repeat this idea in many places, and it's mathematical nonsense. If you change your question to:

Does abcd = 0? (1) abc = 0 (2) bcd = 0

then you certainly do not need to know 'about each variable' to answer the question; the answer is D even though we don't know the value of any of the variables. There are many official DS questions with multiple unknowns which follow a similar pattern - the question asks for the value of some combination of unknowns, and while you cannot determine the value of the unknowns themselves, you can still answer the question. Q168 in the DS section of OG12 is one of many examples.

It is true that something must be known about each variable for Q168. The sufficient statement mentions both variables.

IanStewart wrote:

spacelandprep wrote:

Let's modify this for the GMAT: "Whenever I'm about to pick an answer, I think, "Would a typical GMAT taker pick that answer?"And if they would, I do not pick that answer."

There are many GMAT questions which are genuinely simple. Applying this test to real GMAT questions could easily lead a test taker to 'outsmart' him or herself, and pick the wrong answer rather than the correct one. While I agree one should be suspicious of 'obvious' answers in DS, the safest thing for the test taker to do is to understand the math involved, rather than apply gimmicky 'tricks' which will only give you the right answer some of the time.

While knowing the math is the safest route to a correct answer, it's not always a possible route. Familiarity with the mathematical concepts covered on the GMAT is essential but sometimes a question is simply going to be beyond you, well maybe not you, but some of us. Having an alternate form of approach is necessary in those instances. It's by no means a guarantee, but anything that improves the odds of getting a tough question correct when using math is not an option is a great tool.

Happy New Year everyone! Before I get started on this post, and well, restarted on this blog in general, I wanted to mention something. For the past several months...

It’s quickly approaching two years since I last wrote anything on this blog. A lot has happened since then. When I last posted, I had just gotten back from...

Happy 2017! Here is another update, 7 months later. With this pace I might add only one more post before the end of the GSB! However, I promised that...