Q170 DS GMAT Review 12th Edition - Questionable answer : DS Archive
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 19 Jan 2017, 09:08

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Q170 DS GMAT Review 12th Edition - Questionable answer

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
Intern
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Posts: 2
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Q170 DS GMAT Review 12th Edition - Questionable answer [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Jun 2011, 16:00
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

75% (02:15) correct 25% (00:00) wrong based on 4 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Dear All,

I just need someone to please take a look at this question in GMAT Review 12th Edition, DS, Q170.

If n is a positive integer, is n3 - n divisible by 4?

(1) n=2k + 1, where k is an integer,
(2) n2 + n is divisible by 6.

GMAT answer is A.

However.

n3 - n = n (n2 - 1) = n ( n+1) (n-1) = (n-1) n (n+1), i.e. 3 cons. integers.

n = 2K + 1, where k is an integer. n is a positive ODD integer, i.e. 2K + 1 > 0 and K> -1/2.

So, we can have cons. integers:

0, 1, 2 (where zero is an even integer)

2, 3, 4
and so on, where we are going to have at least one "four", therefore the answer seems to be sufficient EXCEPT we have this possibility of 0, 1, 2 where, as we know, zero is an even integer. n = 2K + 1 holds and so does (n-1) n (n+1). So, in my opinion, this is INSUFFICIENT.

Please help.

Thank you.

Alex
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Director
Affiliations: GMATQuantum
Joined: 19 Apr 2009
Posts: 588
Followers: 112

Kudos [?]: 429 [1] , given: 14

Re: Q170 DS GMAT Review 12th Edition - Questionable answer [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Jun 2011, 17:21
1
This post received
KUDOS
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 1183
Followers: 420

Kudos [?]: 1505 [0], given: 4

Re: Q170 DS GMAT Review 12th Edition - Questionable answer [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Jun 2011, 18:46
Aleks1974 wrote:
Dear All,

I just need someone to please take a look at this question in GMAT Review 12th Edition, DS, Q170.

If n is a positive integer, is n3 - n divisible by 4?

(1) n=2k + 1, where k is an integer,
(2) n2 + n is divisible by 6.

GMAT answer is A.

However.

n3 - n = n (n2 - 1) = n ( n+1) (n-1) = (n-1) n (n+1), i.e. 3 cons. integers.

n = 2K + 1, where k is an integer. n is a positive ODD integer, i.e. 2K + 1 > 0 and K> -1/2.

So, we can have cons. integers:

0, 1, 2 (where zero is an even integer)

2, 3, 4
and so on, where we are going to have at least one "four", therefore the answer seems to be sufficient EXCEPT we have this possibility of 0, 1, 2 where, as we know, zero is an even integer. n = 2K + 1 holds and so does (n-1) n (n+1). So, in my opinion, this is INSUFFICIENT.

Zero is divisible by every positive integer. Remember we say that a is divisible by b if a/b is an integer. So zero is divisible by 4, for example, because 0/4 = 0, which is an integer. So the case where n^3 - n = 0 is not an exception in this question; in that case n^3 - n is certainly divisible by 4.
_________________

GMAT Tutor in Toronto

If you are looking for online GMAT math tutoring, or if you are interested in buying my advanced Quant books and problem sets, please contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

Director
Status: No dream is too large, no dreamer is too small
Joined: 14 Jul 2010
Posts: 651
Followers: 42

Kudos [?]: 861 [0], given: 39

Re: Q170 DS GMAT Review 12th Edition - Questionable answer [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Jun 2011, 03:10
The excellent solution is given in video solution. see it.
_________________

Collections:-
PSof OG solved by GC members: http://gmatclub.com/forum/collection-ps-with-solution-from-gmatclub-110005.html
DS of OG solved by GC members: http://gmatclub.com/forum/collection-ds-with-solution-from-gmatclub-110004.html
100 GMAT PREP Quantitative collection http://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-prep-problem-collections-114358.html
Collections of work/rate problems with solutions http://gmatclub.com/forum/collections-of-work-rate-problem-with-solutions-118919.html
Mixture problems in a file with best solutions: http://gmatclub.com/forum/mixture-problems-with-best-and-easy-solutions-all-together-124644.html

Intern
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Posts: 2
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: Q170 DS GMAT Review 12th Edition - Questionable answer [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Jun 2011, 07:21
IanStewart wrote:
Aleks1974 wrote:
Dear All,

I just need someone to please take a look at this question in GMAT Review 12th Edition, DS, Q170.

If n is a positive integer, is n3 - n divisible by 4?

(1) n=2k + 1, where k is an integer,
(2) n2 + n is divisible by 6.

GMAT answer is A.

However.

n3 - n = n (n2 - 1) = n ( n+1) (n-1) = (n-1) n (n+1), i.e. 3 cons. integers.

n = 2K + 1, where k is an integer. n is a positive ODD integer, i.e. 2K + 1 > 0 and K> -1/2.

So, we can have cons. integers:

0, 1, 2 (where zero is an even integer)

2, 3, 4
and so on, where we are going to have at least one "four", therefore the answer seems to be sufficient EXCEPT we have this possibility of 0, 1, 2 where, as we know, zero is an even integer. n = 2K + 1 holds and so does (n-1) n (n+1). So, in my opinion, this is INSUFFICIENT.

Zero is divisible by every positive integer. Remember we say that a is divisible by b if a/b is an integer. So zero is divisible by 4, for example, because 0/4 = 0, which is an integer. So the case where n^3 - n = 0 is not an exception in this question; in that case n^3 - n is certainly divisible by 4.

Thank you! That's what I needed.

Alex
VP
Status: There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 1353
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 240 [0], given: 10

Re: Q170 DS GMAT Review 12th Edition - Questionable answer [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Jun 2011, 03:27
B is not sufficient because,
n = 2 , 3 give different values.

A is always divisible. Sufficient.
_________________

Visit -- http://www.sustainable-sphere.com/
Promote Green Business,Sustainable Living and Green Earth !!

Re: Q170 DS GMAT Review 12th Edition - Questionable answer   [#permalink] 13 Jun 2011, 03:27
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Q170 DS GMAT Review 12th Edition - Questionable answer

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.