mxb908 wrote:
The question states the following
Is rs/(r+s)>1/2
1. r>1 and s>1
2. r>2 and s>0
I rephrased the question to ask me the following:
2rs>r+s or,
r+s-2rs<0
So basically i was solving for if the r + S - 2rs <0 ?
OA is A
Statement 1 is sufficient if you plug any +ve numbers the result will be -ve, thus implying that the statement is definitively true
Statement 2 is sufficient as per my analysis, but as per the Gmat club explanation it is not sufficient. Could someone please explain me as to where i could be going wrong.
thanks so much,
Best,
There is nothing you can do other than plug-in.
The question is: Is 2rs > r+s ?
Statement 2) r>2 and s>0
Lets assume if r = 300, s = 0.05
2rs > r+s ?
2rs = 2x0.05x300 = 30
r+s = 300+ 0.05 = 300.05
2rs < r+s. so the given statement is not true.
Lets assume differently if r = 300, s = 1
2rs > r+s ?
2rs = 2x1x300 = 600
r+s = 300+1 = 301
2rs > r+s. so the given statement is true.
Therefore 2 is not suff.
statement 1 is suff.
_________________
Verbal: new-to-the-verbal-forum-please-read-this-first-77546.html
Math: new-to-the-math-forum-please-read-this-first-77764.html
Gmat: everything-you-need-to-prepare-for-the-gmat-revised-77983.html
GT