Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 19 Jun 2013, 18:25

# Question of the Day - II

Author Message
TAGS:
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 3170
Location: Pune, India
Followers: 598

Kudos [?]: 2128 [9] , given: 97

Question of the Day - II [#permalink]  29 Oct 2010, 11:18
9
KUDOS
00:00

Question Stats:

56% (02:23) correct 43% (01:08) wrong based on 55 sessions
Q. If f(x) = |4x - 1| + |x-3| + |x + 1|, what is the minimum value of f(x)?

(A) 3
(B) 4
(C) 5
(D) 21/4
(E) 7

(Still high on mods! Next week, will make questions on some other topic.)
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Save 10% on Veritas Prep GMAT Courses And Admissions Consulting
Enroll now. Pay later. Take advantage of Veritas Prep's flexible payment plan options.

Veritas Prep Reviews

CEO
Status: Nothing comes easy: neither do I want.
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Posts: 2762
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V31
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
Followers: 126

Kudos [?]: 644 [4] , given: 222

Re: Question of the Day - II [#permalink]  29 Oct 2010, 18:51
4
KUDOS
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
Q. If f(x) = |4x - 1| + |x-3| + |x + 1|, what is the minimum value of f(x)?

(A) 3
(B) 4
(C) 5
(D) 21/4
(E) 7

(Still high on mods! Next week, will make questions on some other topic.)

put x=0 we get f(x) = 5..rule out D and E

put x=1/4 we get f(x) = 0 + 11/4 + 5/4 = 16/4 = 4.. rule out C D and E

Now the answer is either 3 or 4.

Reason for above checking of values:

for every value of x> 3 the f(x) is quite big because of 4x-1
for every value of x < -1 the f(x) if bigger than 3 and 4.
for x >1/4 and x< 3 f(x) is bigger than 4. because f(x) = 4x-1 + 3-x + x+1 = 4x+3 > 3 => only 4 is the probable answer.

Thus we only need to check x>=-1 and x<= 1/4

f(x) in this domain is = 1-4x + 3-x + x+1 = 5-4x => for f(x) to be minimum the x should be +ve

=> for x = 1/4 , f(x) = 4.

This can be solved using graph as well by plotting the f(x) in different domains.
_________________

Fight for your dreams :For all those who fear from Verbal- lets give it a fight

Money Saved is the Money Earned

Jo Bole So Nihaal , Sat Shri Akaal

Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates

Gmat test review :
670-to-710-a-long-journey-without-destination-still-happy-141642.html

Retired Moderator
Joined: 02 Sep 2010
Posts: 814
Location: London
Followers: 57

Kudos [?]: 307 [4] , given: 25

Re: Question of the Day - II [#permalink]  30 Oct 2010, 01:59
4
KUDOS
Let g(x) = |4x - 1| & h(x)=|x-3| + |x + 1| ... So f(x)=g(x)+h(x)

Now h(x) is equal to 4 between -1 and 3 and is higher everywhere else, so it minimizes between -1 & 3

g(x) is minimum at x=(1/4) where it is equal to 0.

Since -1<(1/4)<3 & f(x)=g(x)+h(x) ... It is straight forward to imply that f(x) will be minimum at 1/4, since both g(x) & h(x) are minimum at that point

f(1/4)=g(1/4)+h(1/4)=0+4

_________________
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 3170
Location: Pune, India
Followers: 598

Kudos [?]: 2128 [8] , given: 97

Re: Question of the Day - II [#permalink]  30 Oct 2010, 08:53
8
KUDOS
That's right! I can count on you guys to always give the correct answer and some innovative ways of solving...

Let me give you the method I would use to solve it too...

Where mods are concerned, the fact that mod signifies the distance from 0 on the number line is my best friend...
So |x-3| is the distance from 3, |x + 1| is the distance from -1 and |4x - 1| is 4 times the distance from 1/4

So |4x - 1| + |x-3| + |x + 1| is the sum of distances from 3, -1 and four times the distance from 1/4 e.g. if x takes the value at point A, f(x) will be sum of length of red line, green line and blue line. the question here is, what is the minimum such sum possible?

Attachment:

Ques.jpg [ 4.56 KiB | Viewed 5124 times ]

Can I say that minimum total distance will be covered from point 1/4?
Attachment:

Ques1.jpg [ 3.43 KiB | Viewed 5123 times ]

The logic being that the distance from 3 to -1, which is 4 units has to be covered. Why to cover any distance from 1/4 at all?
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Save 10% on Veritas Prep GMAT Courses And Admissions Consulting
Enroll now. Pay later. Take advantage of Veritas Prep's flexible payment plan options.

Veritas Prep Reviews

Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 3170
Location: Pune, India
Followers: 598

Kudos [?]: 2128 [0], given: 97

Re: Question of the Day - II [#permalink]  30 Oct 2010, 08:57
In other words, as my mentor says, assume there is one guy on point 3, one on point -1 and 4 guys on point 1/4. If they have to meet up, but cover minimum distance, they should meet at point 1/4. What happens when there are 4 such points? Lets add another term (2x - 3) to f(x)...
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Save 10% on Veritas Prep GMAT Courses And Admissions Consulting
Enroll now. Pay later. Take advantage of Veritas Prep's flexible payment plan options.

Veritas Prep Reviews

Manager
Joined: 11 Jul 2010
Posts: 231
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 20

Re: Question of the Day - II [#permalink]  30 Oct 2010, 09:29

The 3 guys standing at the new 3/2 post + the existing persons at -1 and 3 can again meet at 1/4 as that would be the shortest distance
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 3170
Location: Pune, India
Followers: 598

Kudos [?]: 2128 [1] , given: 97

Re: Question of the Day - II [#permalink]  30 Oct 2010, 16:17
1
KUDOS
gmat1011 wrote:

The 3 guys standing at the new 3/2 post + the existing persons at -1 and 3 can again meet at 1/4 as that would be the shortest distance

Yes, that is right! The answer still remains 1/4.
Since |2x - 3| = 2|x - 3/2| it is twice the distance from 3/2 (or we can say, there are 2 guys are 3/2). The guy at -1 and 3 still need to cover 4 units together. If the 2 guys at 3/2 come down to 1/4, they would have covered less distance than if 4 guys were made to travel anywhere from 1/4.
Attachment:

Ques.jpg [ 5.2 KiB | Viewed 5077 times ]

Try some other combinations. e.g. f(x) = |x - 1| + |x-3| + |x + 1| + |x + 6|
f(x) = |2x - 3| + |4x + 7| etc
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Save 10% on Veritas Prep GMAT Courses And Admissions Consulting
Enroll now. Pay later. Take advantage of Veritas Prep's flexible payment plan options.

Veritas Prep Reviews

CEO
Status: Nothing comes easy: neither do I want.
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Posts: 2762
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V31
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
Followers: 126

Kudos [?]: 644 [0], given: 222

Re: Question of the Day - II [#permalink]  09 Nov 2010, 23:23
VP
Status: There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 1395
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 86 [0], given: 10

Re: Question of the Day - II [#permalink]  14 Jun 2011, 02:14
for x = 0, f(x) = 5. POE options C,D and E.
for x = 1/4, f(x) = 4.
B it is.
_________________

Visit -- http://www.sustainable-sphere.com/
Promote Green Business,Sustainable Living and Green Earth !!

Manager
Joined: 19 Apr 2011
Posts: 114
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 2

Re: Question of the Day - II [#permalink]  14 Jun 2011, 03:47
Very good question thanks for posting
Intern
Joined: 24 Jul 2011
Posts: 14
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 8

Re: Question of the Day - II [#permalink]  15 Mar 2012, 11:07
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
gmat1011 wrote:

The 3 guys standing at the new 3/2 post + the existing persons at -1 and 3 can again meet at 1/4 as that would be the shortest distance

Yes, that is right! The answer still remains 1/4.
Since |2x - 3| = 2|x - 3/2| it is twice the distance from 3/2 (or we can say, there are 2 guys are 3/2). The guy at -1 and 3 still need to cover 4 units together. If the 2 guys at 3/2 come down to 1/4, they would have covered less distance than if 4 guys were made to travel anywhere from 1/4.
Attachment:
Ques.jpg

Try some other combinations. e.g. f(x) = |x - 1| + |x-3| + |x + 1| + |x + 6|
f(x) = |2x - 3| + |4x + 7| etc

Karishman, how are you deciding that distance for 2 guys to travel from 3/2 would be less than distance by 4 guys to move from 1/4 ?
In example : |x - 1| + |x-3| + |x + 1| + |x + 6| .. the posts on the number line are : -6, -1 , 1 and 3. In order to minimize value of this expression to 9, how to chose the x ?

Please correct me if I am wrong.
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 3170
Location: Pune, India
Followers: 598

Kudos [?]: 2128 [2] , given: 97

Re: Question of the Day - II [#permalink]  15 Mar 2012, 11:24
2
KUDOS
Karishman, how are you deciding that distance for 2 guys to travel from 3/2 would be less than distance by 4 guys to move from 1/4 ?
In example : |x - 1| + |x-3| + |x + 1| + |x + 6| .. the posts on the number line are : -6, -1 , 1 and 3. In order to minimize value of this expression to 9, how to chose the x ?

Please correct me if I am wrong.

Forget these numbers. Think logically.

My house is 10 miles away from your house. If we have to meet up, how much distance do we need to cover together? In any case, we need to cover 10 miles together at least, right? Either you come down to my place (you cover 10 miles) or I come down to yours (I cover 10 miles) or we meet mid way (10 miles covered together) or we meet up at a nice coffee place 2 miles further down from my house in the opposite direction in which case we will need to cover more than 10 miles (i.e. we cover 2 + 12 = 14 miles)

Now say, another friend is at my place. In which case will people cover minimum distance together? If two of us come down to your place, we cover 10+10 = 20 miles together but if you come down to our place, you cover only 10 miles. If instead, we meet midway, we cover 5+5 and you cover 5 miles so in all 15 miles. So less number of people should travel the entire distance.
If there are 4 people at point A and 2 at point B, minimum distance will be covered if people at point B travel to point A. So people at 3/2 should come down to 1/4.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Save 10% on Veritas Prep GMAT Courses And Admissions Consulting
Enroll now. Pay later. Take advantage of Veritas Prep's flexible payment plan options.

Veritas Prep Reviews

Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 3170
Location: Pune, India
Followers: 598

Kudos [?]: 2128 [3] , given: 97

Re: Question of the Day - II [#permalink]  15 Mar 2012, 11:33
3
KUDOS
In example : |x - 1| + |x-3| + |x + 1| + |x + 6| .. the posts on the number line are : -6, -1 , 1 and 3. In order to minimize value of this expression to 9, how to chose the x ?

Please correct me if I am wrong.

x is that point on the number line whose sum of distances from -6, -1, 1 and 3 is minimum. So basically there is a person each at points -6, -1, 1 and 3. You need to make them all meet by covering minimum distance.
Distance between -6 and 3 is 9 which must be covered by these 2 people to meet. These 2 can meet at any point: -6, -1, 0, 1 or 3 etc they will cover a distance of 9 together.
If -1 and 1 have to meet too, they need to cover a distance of 2 together. Say, if person at -1 travels down to 1 and -6 and 3 also meet at 1, the minimum distance covered will be 9+2 = 11 and they will all be able to meet.
If they instead meet at -1, the situation will be the same and total distance covered will be 11 again. In fact, they can meet at any point between -1 and 1, the total distance covered will be 11.

To check, put x = 1. you get |x - 1| + |x-3| + |x + 1| + |x + 6| = 11
put x = -1, you get |x - 1| + |x-3| + |x + 1| + |x + 6| = 11
put x = 0, you get |x - 1| + |x-3| + |x + 1| + |x + 6| = 11
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Save 10% on Veritas Prep GMAT Courses And Admissions Consulting
Enroll now. Pay later. Take advantage of Veritas Prep's flexible payment plan options.

Veritas Prep Reviews

Intern
Joined: 24 Jul 2011
Posts: 14
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 8

Re: Question of the Day - II [#permalink]  15 Mar 2012, 14:48
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
In example : |x - 1| + |x-3| + |x + 1| + |x + 6| .. the posts on the number line are : -6, -1 , 1 and 3. In order to minimize value of this expression to 9, how to chose the x ?

Please correct me if I am wrong.

x is that point on the number line whose sum of distances from -6, -1, 1 and 3 is minimum. So basically there is a person each at points -6, -1, 1 and 3. You need to make them all meet by covering minimum distance.
Distance between -6 and 3 is 9 which must be covered by these 2 people to meet. These 2 can meet at any point: -6, -1, 0, 1 or 3 etc they will cover a distance of 9 together.
If -1 and 1 have to meet too, they need to cover a distance of 2 together. Say, if person at -1 travels down to 1 and -6 and 3 also meet at 1, the minimum distance covered will be 9+2 = 11 and they will all be able to meet.
If they instead meet at -1, the situation will be the same and total distance covered will be 11 again. In fact, they can meet at any point between -1 and 1, the total distance covered will be 11.

To check, put x = 1. you get |x - 1| + |x-3| + |x + 1| + |x + 6| = 11
put x = -1, you get |x - 1| + |x-3| + |x + 1| + |x + 6| = 11
put x = 0, you get |x - 1| + |x-3| + |x + 1| + |x + 6| = 11

Thanks Karishma for this detailed explanation.
I got it now.
I was getting 11 as a distance but was not sure, if I should try other values of x to check if there could be a lower value than 11.

To seal the concept, for |2x-3|+|4x+7|, minimum distance be : 3/2+7/4=13/4 ?
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 3170
Location: Pune, India
Followers: 598

Kudos [?]: 2128 [1] , given: 97

Re: Question of the Day - II [#permalink]  15 Mar 2012, 22:03
1
KUDOS
I was getting 11 as a distance but was not sure, if I should try other values of x to check if there could be a lower value than 11.

To seal the concept, for |2x-3|+|4x+7|, minimum distance be : 3/2+7/4=13/4 ?

Look at the diagram below. Make a number line in such questions.
Attachment:

Ques3.jpg [ 5.1 KiB | Viewed 3953 times ]

For x and y to meet, they have to cover a distance of 9 together. For p and q to meet, they have to cover a distance of 2 together. They can meet anywhere between -1 and 1 and they will cover a total distance of 11 only. So x can take any value -1 < x < 1 and the value of the expression will be 11.

|2x-3|+|4x+7| = 2|x-3/2| + 4|x+7/4|

Attachment:

Ques4.jpg [ 5.35 KiB | Viewed 3959 times ]

There are 4 people at -7/4 and 2 people at 3/2. Distance between the two points is 7/4 + 3/2 = 13/4
For these people to meet covering the minimum distance, the 2 people X and Y should travel to point -7/4. (Make minimum people travel). So minimum distance that needs to be covered = 2*13/4 = 13/2 (because 2 people travel 13/4 each) which is the minimum value of the expression. The value of x when the expression takes minimum value is -7/4.
Check by putting x = -7/4. You get |2x-3|+|4x+7| = 13/2

Also see that when you put x = 0 or 3/2 etc, the value of the expression is higher.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Save 10% on Veritas Prep GMAT Courses And Admissions Consulting
Enroll now. Pay later. Take advantage of Veritas Prep's flexible payment plan options.

Veritas Prep Reviews

Intern
Joined: 24 Jul 2011
Posts: 14
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 8

Re: Question of the Day - II [#permalink]  16 Mar 2012, 09:01
Thanks a lot, Karishma.
Intern
Joined: 24 Jul 2011
Posts: 14
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 8

Re: Question of the Day - II [#permalink]  16 Mar 2012, 19:48
I am wondering how can this method be used in questions where there are negative between terms :
Ex: minimum value of : |x+6|-|x-1| ?
Manager
Joined: 28 Jul 2011
Posts: 212
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 12

Re: Question of the Day - II [#permalink]  20 Mar 2012, 14:33
I got C = 5

f(x) = |4x-1| + |x-3| + |x+1|

=(4x-1) + (x-3) + (x+1) or = - (4x-1) - (x-3) - (x+1)
so, x= 1/2

then i used the value of x=1/2

f(x) = |4x-1| + |x-3| + |x+1|

f(1/2) = |4(1/2)-1| + |(1/2)-3| + |(1/2)+1|
= |1| + |-5/2| + |3/2|
= 1 + 5/2 + 3/2
= 5

Is that correct?
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 3170
Location: Pune, India
Followers: 598

Kudos [?]: 2128 [0], given: 97

Re: Question of the Day - II [#permalink]  20 Mar 2012, 21:07
kuttingchai wrote:
I got C = 5

f(x) = |4x-1| + |x-3| + |x+1|

=(4x-1) + (x-3) + (x+1) or = - (4x-1) - (x-3) - (x+1)
so, x= 1/2

then i used the value of x=1/2

f(x) = |4x-1| + |x-3| + |x+1|

f(1/2) = |4(1/2)-1| + |(1/2)-3| + |(1/2)+1|
= |1| + |-5/2| + |3/2|
= 1 + 5/2 + 3/2
= 5

Is that correct?

Put x = 1/4 and the minimum value you will get is 4.
How did you get x = 1/2?
I would suggest you to check out one of the approaches mentioned above.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Save 10% on Veritas Prep GMAT Courses And Admissions Consulting
Enroll now. Pay later. Take advantage of Veritas Prep's flexible payment plan options.

Veritas Prep Reviews

Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 3170
Location: Pune, India
Followers: 598

Kudos [?]: 2128 [1] , given: 97

Re: Question of the Day - II [#permalink]  20 Mar 2012, 21:17
1
KUDOS
I am wondering how can this method be used in questions where there are negative between terms :
Ex: minimum value of : |x+6|-|x-1| ?

You can do it with a negative sign too.
You want to find the minimum value of (distance from -6) - (distance from 1)

Make a number line with -6 and 1 on it.
(-6)..........................(1)

Think of a point in the center of -6 and 1. Its distance from -6 is equal to distance from 1 and hence (distance from -6) - (distance from 1) = 0 .

What if instead, the point x is at -6? Distance from -6 is 0 and distance from 1 is 7 so (distance from -6) - (distance from 1) = 0 - 7 = -7

If you keep moving to the left, (distance from -6) - (distance from 1) will remain -7 so the minimum value is -7.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Save 10% on Veritas Prep GMAT Courses And Admissions Consulting
Enroll now. Pay later. Take advantage of Veritas Prep's flexible payment plan options.

Veritas Prep Reviews

Re: Question of the Day - II   [#permalink] 20 Mar 2012, 21:17
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Questions i and ii are based on the following: Although its 11 03 Mar 2005, 00:00
GMAT prep II - probability question 5 26 Nov 2007, 14:40
Latest questions - II 2 29 Apr 2010, 22:54
Chat with a GMAT Expert II - post your questions 8 22 Jul 2010, 19:57
20 Question of the Day 25 27 Oct 2010, 08:45
Display posts from previous: Sort by