Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 350,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Quick Way to Graph Inequalities [#permalink]
04 Mar 2009, 00:29

39

This post received KUDOS

26

This post was BOOKMARKED

So you're like me and hate inequalities. I've come up with a way to determine what an equality looks like on a graph without plugging in points or solving any math.

Most inequalities look like this: ±x±y<±k OR ±x±y>±k where k is a constant

This is important to know, because each sign in the equality will tell you something important about the graph.

+x indicates you keep EVERYTHING normal (I'll explain later) +y indicates a NEGATIVE slope < indicates you shade to the left (<---) +k indicates the x-intercept is positive (to the right of the origin)

-x indicates you FLIP EVERYTHING (slope, direction of shading, x-int) -y indicates POSITIVE slope > indicates you shade to the RIGHT (--->) -k indicates the x-intercept is negative

Example: 3x+4y<3

Attachment:

1.gif [ 1.87 KiB | Viewed 17603 times ]

You look at +3x and know you don't have to do anything with that since it's positive. +4y indicates the slope is NEGATIVE (it's the opposite of +) < indicates you shade LEFT of the line and +3 indicates the x-int is to the RIGHT of the origin

-2x+5y<-3

Attachment:

2.gif [ 1.59 KiB | Viewed 17493 times ]

-2x means everything gets REVERSED! Like opposite day... that means +5y (which originally indicates a negative slope) is now a POSITIVE slope and < means you shade to the RIGHT (not the left as usual) and -3 means the x-int is POSITIVE (not negative, since x is negative)

Got it?

It's a little something to memorize, but I believe it would help a lot in combination with Walker's Graphic Approach located here: http://gmatclub.com/forum/7-t68037. I think it would definitely save a lot of time when working on some DS problems, which are KNOWN to have tons of inequalities.

Tell me what you think. This is my first post, so go easy on me I can do more examples if you need!

Re: Quick Way to Graph Inequalities [#permalink]
10 Nov 2009, 15:15

3

This post received KUDOS

1

This post was BOOKMARKED

This is a very good post. Quick solving is the key in GMAT and this certainly goes a long way in helping!

There is one thing I would like to add though.

Suppose we encounter an equation in which we are required to multiply or divide by the variable x or y (as in the question explained by walker in his topic dealing with graphs), then we have to simply break it up into two cases and solve it.

Let me take the following equation as an example (those of you who have gone through walkers post might recognize this equation):

\((x/y) > 2\)

now in order to plot it using the 'quick' approach, we have to break it up in to two cases.

1) When y is positive:

\(x > 2y\) which can be written as \(x - 2y > 0\)

This case gives us the required line. However, it only gives us the region for y>0. To find the region for y<0, we need case 2.

2) When y is negative:

\((x/-y) > 2\) , now multiply both sides with -1 and simplify.

we get \(x + 2y < 0\)

This case gives us the region for all y<0.

Thus from the above two cases, we infer that:

1) For all positive values of y, the region lies to the right (as given by the equation in case 1).

2) For all negative values of y, the region lies to the left (as given by the equation in case 2).

Note: x = 0 is the line above which all y is positive and below which all y is negative. Thus, it will act as a boundary line. Also, while plotting the line, we should think of an '=' present instead of the inequality in the original equation. The inequality comes into the picture when we want to plot the region.

Re: Quick Way to Graph Inequalities [#permalink]
04 Mar 2009, 05:28

2

This post received KUDOS

Here's a couple more examples:

5x-7y<-4

Attachment:

3.gif [ 1.91 KiB | Viewed 17287 times ]

+5x: No reversing/reversing/"oppositing" -7y: Positive slope <: shade to the left of the line -4: X-intercept is negative (to the left of the origin)

-3x-6y<-9

Attachment:

4.gif [ 1.84 KiB | Viewed 17283 times ]

-3x: Everything will be reversed! -6y: Positive slope, but since there's a -3x, it will be negative <: Supposed to mean shade to the left, but it's right this time because of the -3x -9: Like the others, generally means negative x-intercept. It will be positive because of the -3x

Re: Quick Way to Graph Inequalities [#permalink]
07 Mar 2009, 09:12

2

This post received KUDOS

1

This post was BOOKMARKED

ritula wrote:

wht if k=0? say x-2y>0 How will the graph be like?

Ritula,

When k = 0, then the striaght line will always pass thru the origin. The way that I do is, make it if the form y<=>= mx. Depending on whether m(which is the slope) is positive or negative, we determine how we can draw the graph.

If m is positive, the line runs from bottom left to top right. If m is negative, the line runs from top left to bottom right.

One more thing that you can make a note.

If |m| < 1(absolute value of slope) then line is inclined towards X axis. If |m| > 1(absolute value of slope) then line is inclined towards Y axis. If |m| = 1(absolute value of slope) then line is inclined exactly 45 degrees with X axis.

In our case, x - 2y>0, can be written as y<1/2x. Slope is positive, and is less than 1. Hence the graph looks like the below.

I have drawn the cases where the slope is positive and negative and also when the slope is > 1 or less than 1. Hope you get the idea now.

Attachments

Various lines passing thru origin.jpg [ 358.33 KiB | Viewed 17059 times ]

Last edited by mrsmarthi on 09 Mar 2009, 19:09, edited 1 time in total.

Re: Quick Way to Graph Inequalities [#permalink]
04 Mar 2009, 05:40

Nach0 wrote:

Here's a couple more examples:

5x-7y<-4

Attachment:

3.gif

+5x: No reversing/reversing/"oppositing" -7y: Positive slope <: shade to the left of the line -4: X-intercept is negative (to the left of the origin)

-3x-6y<-9

Attachment:

4.gif

-3x: Everything will be reversed! -6y: Positive slope, but since there's a -3x, it will be negative <: Supposed to mean shade to the left, but it's right this time because of the -3x -9: Like the others, generally means negative x-intercept. It will be positive because of the -3x

Excellent +1 from me.

the exact values can be plotted by substituting x =... -2,-1.0,1,2,3.... which will be useful in merging two graphs and finding the intersection.

Re: Quick Way to Graph Inequalities [#permalink]
04 Mar 2009, 05:50

selvae wrote:

Nach0 wrote:

Here's a couple more examples:

5x-7y<-4

Attachment:

3.gif

+5x: No reversing/reversing/"oppositing" -7y: Positive slope <: shade to the left of the line -4: X-intercept is negative (to the left of the origin)

-3x-6y<-9

Attachment:

4.gif

-3x: Everything will be reversed! -6y: Positive slope, but since there's a -3x, it will be negative <: Supposed to mean shade to the left, but it's right this time because of the -3x -9: Like the others, generally means negative x-intercept. It will be positive because of the -3x

Excellent +1 from me.

the exact values can be plotted by substituting x =... -2,-1.0,1,2,3.... which will be useful in merging two graphs and finding the intersection.

Also kind of fine tuning the logic (still you hold the patent )

for the scenario 2, where you said when X coeff. is negative, can be converted to scenario 1 by multilying -1 both the side.

So -4x+5y<6 becomes, 4x -5y >-6 the diagram still look the same. and the user dont have to remember too much of logics.

Re: Quick Way to Graph Inequalities [#permalink]
07 Mar 2009, 09:22

kbulse wrote:

2 Nach0

how do you find at which points lines intersect axises? thanks

This is simple.

Put x = 0, and find the y intercept(treating inequality as equality sign). Then the point obtained will be (0, y intercept) which is the point on Y axis.

Similary put x =0 and find the x intercept(treating inequality as equality sign). Then the point obtained will be (x intercept,0) which is the point on X axis.

It will either provide you with a graph or an inequality. From then you must match it with the corrersponding answer.

You can practice taking what you've learned and applying right away. It will help to quickly determine what kind of grap you are working with.

Thanks Nach0 for the link above. Really very helpful. Do you know if there are any other exercises on this serevr which may be good for GMAT? _________________

The Stanford interview is an alumni-run interview. You give Stanford your current address and they reach out to alumni in your area to find one that can interview you...

Originally, I was supposed to have an in-person interview for Yale in New Haven, CT. However, as I mentioned in my last post about how to prepare for b-school interviews...

Interested in applying for an MBA? In the fourth and final part of our live QA series with guest expert Chioma Isiadinso, co-founder of consultancy Expartus and former admissions...