" Phil is the greatest sportsperson in the history of football. Most of the football lovers agree with this fact while some disagree with it".
if i have to pre phrase this,what would the conclusion be?
Conclusion is the author's opinion. It is what he/she is trying to convey through the argument. What do you think the author is trying to convey? What does he/she believe in?
Without knowing the rest of the argument, it is hard to say but from what it is given, I would say that the conclusion is the following:
"Phil is the greatest sportsperson in the history of football."
This is what the author thinks. He/she also says that most football lovers agree with this FACT. HE/she says that it is a fact so he/she does believe in it.
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for $199
Veritas Prep Reviews