Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Pardon me for the wrong answer given last time. The answer is indeed B.

Only in the case of R>0 would the equation (r+t)/(r-t)>0. r>t be satisfied. If r is less than 0, then the equation may result is either case. If R>0, then if t is more than r then, the original equation will not be satisfied. I had checked this with number subs .. for any value of R more than 0, the equation to be valid, t shoud be less than r.

Sorry for causing the confusion.
Regards _________________

You have made a mistake here. If r is less than t, then the original equation does not stand good. Taking your case, you have mentioned, if r=3, then the orginal equation (r+4)/(r-4)>0 will be less than 0. But we are not suppose to change the orginal equation in here.

If t>0, take as an example t=1 and r=3. in this case the result will be (3+1)/(3-1) =2>0 sufficient

But if r>0 this do not mean that t must be positive it could be any number less than r. for example, r=2 t=-4
(2-4)/(2+4)=-2/6 . In other cases the result will be poistive. hence, Insufficient.

If t>0, take as an example t=1 and r=3. in this case the result will be (3+1)/(3-1) =2>0 sufficient

But if r>0 this do not mean that t must be positive it could be any number less than r. for example, r=2 t=-4 (2-4)/(2+4)=-2/6 . In other cases the result will be poistive. hence, Insufficient.

Correct me if I am wrong.

good luck all

No, dr_sabr, it is wrong. Look, the stem SHOULD be always true, and in your example it is not satisfied! But it should be!

I will take 1) first.
If t>0, take as an example t=1 and r=3. in this case the result will be (3+1)/(3-1) =2>0 sufficient. because whatever is t, r must be >t.

2) But if r>0 this do not mean that t must be positive it could be any number less than r. for example, r=2 t=-4 =>(2-4)/(2+4)=-2/6 . In another case if r=3 t=2 =>(3+2)/(3-2)=5>0 . hence, Insufficient

Correct me if I am mistaken . _________________

-Genius is one percent inspiration, and ninety-nine percent perspiration.

2) But if r>0 this do not mean that t must be positive it could be any number less than r.

NOT any number less than r, but any number, for which the STEM is true! i.e., for which (r+t)/(r-t) > 0. But in your example this is not the case: r = 2, t = -4 and (r+t)/(r-t) = -1/3 < 0 and this contradicts the stem!!!

dr_sabr wrote:

for example, r=2 t=-4 =>(2-4)/(2+4)=-2/6 . In another case if r=3 t=2 =>(3+2)/(3-2)=5>0 . hence, Insufficient

But in your example this is not the case: r = 2, t = -4 and (r+t)/(r-t) = -1/3 < 0 and this contradicts the stem!!!

I think that I misunderstood this question, I thought the stem was r>t . Thank you Emmanuel for correcting me. I hope I don't make this mistake on the test. _________________

-Genius is one percent inspiration, and ninety-nine percent perspiration.

But in your example this is not the case: r = 2, t = -4 and (r+t)/(r-t) = -1/3 < 0 and this contradicts the stem!!!

I think that I misunderstood this question, I thought the stem was r>t . Thank you Emmanuel for correcting me. I hope I don't make this mistake on the test.

I hope that you will do such questions easily on the test, once you have seen what problems can arise here.