Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
all fractions are close to 1/3 So if we take each \(I. 47/150<50/150=1/3\) \(II. 111/330>110/330=1/3\) \(III. 299/900<300/900=1/3\) Now between II and III we can easily figure out that 299 is closer to 300 than \(47*3\). So III>I So the correct order from smallest to largest is : \(I>III>II\) So shouldn't it be B? _________________
So the correct order from smallest to largest is : \(I>III>II\) So shouldn't it be B?
Yes, you are 100% correct. I changed this in the problem above. I said "smallest to largest", but then when I did it in my head, I put them in order from largest to smallest! Sorry about any confusion. Mike _________________
Re: Rank those three in order from smallest to biggest. [#permalink]
19 Dec 2012, 05:28
I. 47/150 is almost 50/150 = 1/3. It is (50-47)/150 = 3/150 = 1/50 away from 1/3 II. 111/330 is beyond 110/330 = 1/3 III. 299/900 is almost 300/900 = 1/3. 299/900 is (300-299)/900 = 1/900 away from 1/3
I is the farther to the left of 1/3 than III while II is the largest.
Check out this awesome article about Anderson on Poets Quants, http://poetsandquants.com/2015/01/02/uclas-anderson-school-morphs-into-a-friendly-tech-hub/ . Anderson is a great place! Sorry for the lack of updates recently. I...