Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 21 Oct 2014, 10:32

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Ranking Systems

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
1 KUDOS received
CEO
CEO
avatar
Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Posts: 3281
Followers: 21

Kudos [?]: 435 [1] , given: 0

Ranking Systems [#permalink] New post 30 Nov 2004, 17:55
1
This post received
KUDOS
Many readers have expressed confusion regarding the Cluster Ranking System. The model stems from, well you guessed it, a cluster analysis of business schools. As with any ranking system (whether it is of NCAA football or GPA) one should use scholastic rankings with caution. Further, these rankings concern only general reputation of the school and often schools have domain specific ranks that are much stronger than their general rank.

Why use cluster analysis instead of a strict, floor to ceiling ordinal list?
Primarily because these strict ordinal lists have the danger of forcing distinctions among programs of virtually identical standing. In addition, the variables that we use to measure scholastic quality and opportunities are extremely imprecise. Thus, we are deluding ourselves if we believe that we can make meaningful distinctions among schools of similar standing. However, we can make broad distinctions among schools of dissimilar standing.

Why not simply use a "top 5, top 10" list?
These lists are disfavored since they suggest that schools are highly discontinuous in their opportunity sets. For instance, the #11 school (however defined) might be mistakenly viewed as being meaninfullly inferior to the #10 school. Another reason that these lists are disfavored is that the standing of institutions rarely change as rapidly as their standings in league tables change (Yes, glaciers do move, but one should not confuse them with cheetahs).

Why not call them Tier I or Tier II etc.?
I suppose one could use these terms, but I prefer the descriptive labels. I like the way that the labels call attention to the proximity of the cluster to the elite schools. Thus, Near Elite makes it clear that these are prestigious schools if not quite on the level of the most esteemed general reputation schools.

Why do these clusters include only US schools?
This is certainly a legitimate criticism. The main reason concerns the type of information available from each school. However, one can rather easily project non-US schools onto this cluster system. For instance, INSEAD and LBS could be included in the Elite cluster.

Ultraelite- The 7 most esteemed US schools, essentially the top of the elite group.

Elite- The most selective group of school (used as both a generic term for all 16 top schools and and a specific term for the schools just below the Ultraelite)

Transelite- The schools that overlap with many of the Elite group. This handful of schools essentially "blends into" the lower edge of the Elite group.

Near Elite- Usually relatively small and highly specialized schools. Within specific domains such as finance and marketing these schools are outstanding.

Near Elite Frontier: These are nationally recognized programs that are less selective than the Near Elite schools. Many offer outstanding opportunities for budget conscious consumers.

Hjort
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 03 Nov 2004
Posts: 489
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 30 Nov 2004, 23:15
hjort,

great post. i was reading a few of your reviews and i was wondering why you classified stuff as elite, nearelite etc. providing with a definition for each term it is clearer now for many of us. i guess my quesiton would be in which categorie would you put the following schools:

UNC - Chapel Hill, UVA-Darden, Ohio State-Fisher, Boston Uni, Boston College, Northeastern Uni, UConn, University of South Carolina and Thunderbird.
CEO
CEO
avatar
Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Posts: 3281
Followers: 21

Kudos [?]: 435 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 01 Dec 2004, 19:48
Perhaps this helps for General Reputation:

UNC TransElite
UVA Elite
Ohio State, Thunderbird, BC, BU Near Elite Frontier

Hjort
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 03 Nov 2004
Posts: 489
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 01 Dec 2004, 20:19
thanx for the quick reply hjort. this classification really helps me choose better schools in which i will have a greater chance of getting into . thnx again cheerz :-D
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 03 Nov 2004
Posts: 489
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 09 Dec 2004, 17:52
hey hjort,

which schools would you include in the ultraelite , elite, transelite, and nearelite rankings ?
CEO
CEO
avatar
Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Posts: 3281
Followers: 21

Kudos [?]: 435 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 11 Dec 2004, 13:50
Another good question . . . I am building up the reviews on this site starting with the Near Elite and working toward the Ultra Elite.

Hjort
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 03 Nov 2004
Posts: 489
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 11 Dec 2004, 21:08
that would be great i kinda saw a pattern there. thanx again
1 KUDOS received
CEO
CEO
avatar
Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Posts: 3281
Followers: 21

Kudos [?]: 435 [1] , given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 15 Dec 2004, 19:14
1
This post received
KUDOS
In no particular order within clusters . . .

Ultraelite

MIT
Columbia
Penn
Stanford
Chicago
Harvard
Northwestern

Elite

NYU
Michigan
Cornell
UCLA
Duke
UC Berkeley
Yale
Dartmouth
Virginia

Transelite

Emory
USC (Marshall)
Texas (McCombs)
Carnegie Mellon
North Carolina (Kenan-Flagler)

Near Elite

Washington University (Olin)
Purdue
Rochester
Vanderbilt
Georgetown
Notre Dame
Maryland (Smith)
Indiana (Kelley)


Some notes on clusters:

As a generality, the Near Elite schoools are quite small. Even a relatively large NE school such as Maryland has fewer FT students than Stanford, the smallest of the Ultraelites.

The Near Elites have a number of specialist schools that are difficult to beat within their specialty. For instance, Maryland and Rochester are outstanding schools in their specific domains.

Hjort

Last edited by Hjort on 05 Jan 2005, 17:58, edited 1 time in total.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 03 Nov 2004
Posts: 489
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 15 Dec 2004, 20:00
thanx for the great list hjort, it is a really helpful tool for all of us. :-D
CEO
CEO
avatar
Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Posts: 3281
Followers: 21

Kudos [?]: 435 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 15 Dec 2004, 20:04
Please feel free to ask any questions . . .
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 03 Nov 2004
Posts: 489
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 15 Dec 2004, 20:18
:-D surprised not to see cornel and michigan not in the ultraelite cluster. whats your basis for placement in clusters - general reputation/recruiters/gmat scores ... etc??
CEO
CEO
avatar
Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Posts: 3281
Followers: 21

Kudos [?]: 435 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 16 Dec 2004, 17:40
Generally, I have included the typical information such as admissions, placement, league table standings in forming the clusters. As I recall, Michigan was strongly in the elite group but simply did not have the overall recruiting power of the ultraelite. Cornell is pretty typical elite school but also lacks the recruiting power of the ultraelites. It is not that Cornell and Michigan are weak so much as the Ultraelites are simply so strong.

Hjort
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 03 Nov 2004
Posts: 489
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 16 Dec 2004, 19:46
very well put hjort, thanx for clarifying it.


kayser
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4318
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 172 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 16 Dec 2004, 21:02
Hey Hjort, this is a superb post. Thank you very much. By the way, I happened to have read the post on Wharton resumes and well, I guess it's normal that anyone would just feel somewhat intimidated by such CVs. However, apart from ultraelite schools, should one expect to see such CV caliber at Elite schools(INSEAD, LBS) or transelite schools :? ?
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 02 Sep 2004
Posts: 35
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Hi [#permalink] New post 21 Dec 2004, 21:19
This classification is the cornerstone on which Hjort helped me to select my schools and believe me this made my life much easier.

The whole process of selecting the schools otherwise does not have a scientific bend to it....

About - CVs being great and blah blah blah....Paul dont worry. CV writing is an art and most CV's can be tailored to show strength.


Finally, I would like to add that the Cluster classification should be assisted with cluster by specialization. The combination of the two would help in shortlisting the schools better.

Regards
_________________

To be or not to be....

GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4318
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 172 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 24 Dec 2004, 06:47
Thank you nitinag for the info.
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

CEO
CEO
avatar
Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Posts: 3281
Followers: 21

Kudos [?]: 435 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 26 Dec 2004, 22:33
Over time I would like to put up information regarding specific domains such as finance and marketing. Sadly, however, this is one of those projects that will have to wait . . .

Hjort
Joined: 31 Dec 1969
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, Other
GPA: 3.64
WE: Accounting (Accounting)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 70 [0], given: 78565

CAT Tests
 [#permalink] New post 27 Dec 2004, 02:08
Hello Hjort ,

Can you please tell us about MBA in university of california ,Irwin


Thanks
CEO
CEO
avatar
Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Posts: 3281
Followers: 21

Kudos [?]: 435 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 27 Dec 2004, 15:01
I have created a separate post for UC Irvine.

Hjort
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 14 Dec 2004
Posts: 1709
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 0

Granular schools ranks [#permalink] New post 05 Jan 2005, 00:02
Hi Hjort,

Your post regarding ranking is really helpful. I appreciate it.

I saw many questions on the forum like, "which school is better for particular program?"

Can you please give us ranking of the schools according to the programs?
That would also be really helpful, since some of the schools may change the clusters for some programs. Also, most of us select school depending on what program we are interested in! ...... it would be really helpful :)

Cheers,
Vivek
Granular schools ranks   [#permalink] 05 Jan 2005, 00:02
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
International B-school ranking system weijunzi 1 26 Mar 2013, 07:22
Ranking heyholetsgo 0 16 Jan 2012, 15:15
Rankings seanpatin 13 06 Jul 2007, 16:37
Rankings u2lover 8 01 Dec 2006, 13:07
Rankings kayser`soze 6 17 Jan 2005, 06:20
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Ranking Systems

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 28 posts ] 



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.