Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 26 Jul 2014, 09:22

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

RC - comparable worth (!women forever!)

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 19 Mar 2007
Posts: 526
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
RC - comparable worth (!women forever!) [#permalink] New post 29 Mar 2007, 03:27
GMAC seems to like women problems :) Please consider another reading comprehension. Spend no more than 18-20 minutes on it!!! :twisted:

**********************
Comparable worth is a concept that rejects the premise of a separate and lower wage hierarchy for jobs that are done primarily by women, arguing instead that earnings should reflect only the worth of the work performed. This worth should be determined by an evaluation system that rates jobs according to their social importance and skill requirements. Because comparable worth does not attack all forms of inequality, it can have only a modest direct effect on the overall degree of inequality in society, but in attacking gender inequality in the job classification system it attacks a major component of gender inequality in the United States. The likelihood that other forms of inequality will become more manifest with the lessening of gender inequality is not a valid argument against comparable worth. Indeed, struggles for comparable worth may help launch campaigns against similar forms of inequity. Still, while conservatives have battled hard against comparable worth, radicals have been reluctant to fight for it because they see the narrow presentations in comparable worth litigation as the limits of the concept. But in addition to helping redress particular inequities, comparable worth could open a discussion of the entire wage system. Its theoretical and political impact will reach far beyond the framework in which it was conceived and force a rethinking of assumptions underlying current employment practices and the market itself.

How comparable worth will affect the hierarchy of wages is more difficult to foresee. It does not directly challenge the concept of a hierarchy; in fact, its insistence that jobs must be evaluated implies a hierarchy. However, its rejection of the market as an adequate basis for determining wages initiates a discussion of how value should be assigned to jobs. Advocates of comparable worth have challenged prevailing standards of evaluation, which them from formal job ovalions first developed in industrial settings. These evaluations, based on points awarded for different job tasks, gave considerable emphasis to such activities as strenuous lifting and the operation of expensive equipment. Consequently, the skills and knowledge more typical of work done by women are less heavily emphasized. The `Dictionary of Occupational Titles’ reveals numerous current instances of such imbalance in job ratings.

While comparable-worth advocates accept the principle of a hierarchy of wages, arguing only that they seek more objective measures of job worth, the issues they raise provoke a broader debate. This debate does not, as the opponents have claimed, concern the feasibility of setting up and applying evaluative standards. Employers have done that for centuries. Rather, the debate is about the social values and priorities underlying the wage hierarchy and, ultimately, the market where age-old conventions and political, as opposed to purely economic, forces enter the process of setting wages.


1. Which of the following summarizes a main point of the passage?
(A) The history of comparable worth closely parallels the history of changes in the structure of the economic system.
(B) The ultimate success of comparable worth depends on a public discussion of the historical conditions that led to its formulation.
(C) Comparable worth has social implications that extend beyond specific adjustments to the wage hierarchies for men and women.
(D) Comparable worth is gaining adherents even though it has traditionally met with organized opposition.
(E) Comparable worth has been instrumental in affording women access to jobs that had been held largely by men.


2. It can be inferred that the phrase a separate and lower wage hierarchy for jobs that are done primarily by women, as used in lines 2-3 of the passage, most nearly means which of the following?
(A) That there is a greater range of salaries for men than for women
(B) That women typically receive less money than men do for doing jobs of approximately the same value
(C) That there are fewer wage-earning women than men in the work force
(D) That men have traditionally been more likely than women to receive advancement on the basis of seniority
(E) That men and women typically do not compete for the same jobs


3. In the first paragraph of the passage, the author describes the potential role and function of comparable worth in language that most often suggests
(A) artistic endeavors
(B) business transactions
(C) criminal investigations
(D) military operations
(E) scientific experiments


4. It can be inferred from the passage that advocates of comparable worth believe which of the following?
(A) A given kind of work has a particular inherent value to the employer or to society.
(B) The market is more influenced by political and social forces now than it was in the past.
(C) Gender inequality in the United States is primarily a product of the current economic system.
(D) Conservatives and radicals have the same reasons for not supporting comparable worth.
(E) Those who devised job-evaluation standards were more interested in economic than political issues.

5. As used by the author in line 2 of the last paragraph, “more objectiveâ€
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Jul 2006
Posts: 299
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 30 Mar 2007, 09:45
1.a
2.b
3.d
4.a
5.a
6.c
7.e
8.c

Hard passage, do not know how I did. Did not answer 9 because I cannot figure out how it is related to the passage at all...
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 18 Nov 2006
Posts: 125
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: RC - comparable worth (!women forever!) [#permalink] New post 30 Mar 2007, 10:26
[quote="nick_sun"]GMAC seems to like women problems :) Please consider another reading comprehension. Spend no more than 18-20 minutes on it!!! :twisted:

**********************
Comparable worth is a concept that rejects the premise of a separate and lower wage hierarchy for jobs that are done primarily by women, arguing instead that earnings should reflect only the worth of the work performed. This worth should be determined by an evaluation system that rates jobs according to their social importance and skill requirements. Because comparable worth does not attack all forms of inequality, it can have only a modest direct effect on the overall degree of inequality in society, but in attacking gender inequality in the job classification system it attacks a major component of gender inequality in the United States. The likelihood that other forms of inequality will become more manifest with the lessening of gender inequality is not a valid argument against comparable worth. Indeed, struggles for comparable worth may help launch campaigns against similar forms of inequity. Still, while conservatives have battled hard against comparable worth, radicals have been reluctant to fight for it because they see the narrow presentations in comparable worth litigation as the limits of the concept. But in addition to helping redress particular inequities, comparable worth could open a discussion of the entire wage system. Its theoretical and political impact will reach far beyond the framework in which it was conceived and force a rethinking of assumptions underlying current employment practices and the market itself.

How comparable worth will affect the hierarchy of wages is more difficult to foresee. It does not directly challenge the concept of a hierarchy; in fact, its insistence that jobs must be evaluated implies a hierarchy. However, its rejection of the market as an adequate basis for determining wages initiates a discussion of how value should be assigned to jobs. Advocates of comparable worth have challenged prevailing standards of evaluation, which them from formal job ovalions first developed in industrial settings. These evaluations, based on points awarded for different job tasks, gave considerable emphasis to such activities as strenuous lifting and the operation of expensive equipment. Consequently, the skills and knowledge more typical of work done by women are less heavily emphasized. The `Dictionary of Occupational Titles’ reveals numerous current instances of such imbalance in job ratings.

While comparable-worth advocates accept the principle of a hierarchy of wages, arguing only that they seek more objective measures of job worth, the issues they raise provoke a broader debate. This debate does not, as the opponents have claimed, concern the feasibility of setting up and applying evaluative standards. Employers have done that for centuries. Rather, the debate is about the social values and priorities underlying the wage hierarchy and, ultimately, the market where age-old conventions and political, as opposed to purely economic, forces enter the process of setting wages.


1. Which of the following summarizes a main point of the passage?
(A) The history of comparable worth closely parallels the history of changes in the structure of the economic system.
(B) The ultimate success of comparable worth depends on a public discussion of the historical conditions that led to its formulation.
(C) Comparable worth has social implications that extend beyond specific adjustments to the wage hierarchies for men and women.
(D) Comparable worth is gaining adherents even though it has traditionally met with organized opposition.
(E) Comparable worth has been instrumental in affording women access to jobs that had been held largely by men.


2. It can be inferred that the phrase a separate and lower wage hierarchy for jobs that are done primarily by women, as used in lines 2-3 of the passage, most nearly means which of the following?
(A) That there is a greater range of salaries for men than for women
(B) That women typically receive less money than men do for doing jobs of approximately the same value
(C) That there are fewer wage-earning women than men in the work force
(D) That men have traditionally been more likely than women to receive advancement on the basis of seniority
(E) That men and women typically do not compete for the same jobs


3. In the first paragraph of the passage, the author describes the potential role and function of comparable worth in language that most often suggests
(A) artistic endeavors
(B) business transactions
(C) criminal investigations
(D) military operations
(E) scientific experiments


4. It can be inferred from the passage that advocates of comparable worth believe which of the following?
(A) A given kind of work has a particular inherent value to the employer or to society.
(B) The market is more influenced by political and social forces now than it was in the past.
(C) Gender inequality in the United States is primarily a product of the current economic system.
(D) Conservatives and radicals have the same reasons for not supporting comparable worth.
(E) Those who devised job-evaluation standards were more interested in economic than political issues.

5. As used by the author in line 2 of the last paragraph, “more objectiveâ€
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 19 Mar 2007
Posts: 526
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 30 Mar 2007, 11:34
Well done guys :) Must admit Blissful hit most points among us.

OAs: 1.C 2.B 3.D 4.A 5.E 6.A 7.E 8.D 9.D
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 11 Mar 2007
Posts: 9
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Correct Answer to #1 [#permalink] New post 29 Apr 2007, 04:43
The correct answer to #1 is B. Can anyone explain why? I thought it was D.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Jul 2004
Posts: 474
Location: united states
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 13 May 2007, 14:51
Blissful, could you summarise your RC strategy? I find myself wanting most of the times whenever I see such passages.

thanks
shoonya
_________________

for every person who doesn't try because he is
afraid of loosing , there is another person who
keeps making mistakes and succeeds..

  [#permalink] 13 May 2007, 14:51
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
11 Experts publish their posts in the topic Comparable worth, as a standard applied to eliminate solarzj 21 16 May 2012, 23:25
Comparable worth is a concept that rejects the premise of a loll 1 04 Nov 2011, 19:49
Comparable worth is a concept that rejects the premise of a adiraju 4 09 Jul 2009, 07:36
Comparable worth, as a standard applied to eliminate sondenso 15 13 May 2008, 20:03
Comparable worth is a concept that rejects the premise of a old_dream_1976 1 26 Jul 2006, 20:19
Display posts from previous: Sort by

RC - comparable worth (!women forever!)

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.