Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 28 Aug 2016, 05:20

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

RC: Federal Authorities, local witnesses

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 25 May 2008
Posts: 46
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 0

RC: Federal Authorities, local witnesses [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 Oct 2008, 06:07
Question:

Federal authorities involved in the investigation have found the local witnesses are difficult to locate, reticent, and are suspicious of strangers

b. local witnesses to be difficult to locate, reticent, and are
c. that local witnessea re difficult to locate, reticent, and
d. local witnesses are difficult to locate and reticent, and they are
e. that local witnesses are difficult to locate and reticent, and they are

Why?

Should a that not be present right after found??

Director
Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 838
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 61 [0], given: 0

Re: RC: Federal Authorities, local witnesses [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 Oct 2008, 09:38
hbs2012 wrote:
Question:

Federal authorities involved in the investigation have found the local witnesses are difficult to locate, reticent, and are suspicious of strangers

b. local witnesses to be difficult to locate, reticent, and are
c. that local witnessea re difficult to locate, reticent, and
d. local witnesses are difficult to locate and reticent, and they are
e. that local witnesses are difficult to locate and reticent, and they are

Why?

Should a that not be present right after found??

A doesnt sound good but it sounds better than the rest

in E you cant say "local witnesses are difficult to locate and reticent" because it doesnt make sense

whats the source of this question?
Intern
Joined: 25 May 2008
Posts: 46
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 0

Re: RC: Federal Authorities, local witnesses [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 Oct 2008, 22:31
Thanks Bigtreezl

The source for the above question is Old Test papers.
These have been labeled test codes
This particular one is from test code 14.. I think.

But.. it would be even more helpful if you could explain why E doesn't sound right.. I thought it sounded parallel
VP
Joined: 30 Jun 2008
Posts: 1043
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 511 [1] , given: 1

Re: RC: Federal Authorities, local witnesses [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 Oct 2008, 22:43
1
KUDOS
hbs2012 wrote:
Thanks Bigtreezl

The source for the above question is Old Test papers.
These have been labeled test codes
This particular one is from test code 14.. I think.

But.. it would be even more helpful if you could explain why E doesn't sound right.. I thought it sounded parallel

hbs2012 (I do hope you make it to hbs All the best)

Ok now, we can eliminate E because it has the ambiguous "they". Who are they ?? locals ? detectives ?
Using this we can eliminate D as well.

Choice A has the redundant "and are". It is better to say Locals are x,y and z
Choice B "to be" and "and are" is not parallel.

This leaves us with choice C ( OA is C, Please check the answer key, Test 14 Pg.33 Section 6 10th question)
_________________

"You have to find it. No one else can find it for you." - Bjorn Borg

Intern
Joined: 25 May 2008
Posts: 46
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 0

Re: RC: Federal Authorities, local witnesses [#permalink]

Show Tags

14 Oct 2008, 00:32
Thanks bigtreezl
SVP
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1570
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 234 [0], given: 0

Re: RC: Federal Authorities, local witnesses [#permalink]

Show Tags

14 Oct 2008, 02:07
amitdgr wrote:
hbs2012 wrote:
Thanks Bigtreezl

The source for the above question is Old Test papers.
These have been labeled test codes
This particular one is from test code 14.. I think.

But.. it would be even more helpful if you could explain why E doesn't sound right.. I thought it sounded parallel

hbs2012 (I do hope you make it to hbs All the best)

Ok now, we can eliminate E because it has the ambiguous "they". Who are they ?? locals ? detectives ?
Using this we can eliminate D as well.

Choice A has the redundant "and are". It is better to say Locals are x,y and z
Choice B "to be" and "and are" is not parallel.

This leaves us with choice C ( OA is C, Please check the answer key, Test 14 Pg.33 Section 6 10th question)

This makes sense. I was wondering how A could be right.
Manager
Joined: 22 Jul 2008
Posts: 154
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

Re: RC: Federal Authorities, local witnesses [#permalink]

Show Tags

15 Oct 2008, 14:16
C is correct.
Manager
Joined: 16 Jan 2008
Posts: 109
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 6

Re: RC: Federal Authorities, local witnesses [#permalink]

Show Tags

16 Oct 2008, 11:43
C is correct, I've seen this que in OG
BSchool Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Oct 2009
Posts: 601
GMAT 1: 530 Q47 V17
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36
Followers: 36

Kudos [?]: 257 [0], given: 410

Re: RC: Federal Authorities, local witnesses [#permalink]

Show Tags

20 Mar 2010, 09:29
Thanku for the explanations
Manager
Joined: 25 Dec 2009
Posts: 66
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 2

Re: RC: Federal Authorities, local witnesses [#permalink]

Show Tags

07 Jun 2010, 23:20
amitdgr wrote:
hbs2012 wrote:
Thanks Bigtreezl

The source for the above question is Old Test papers.
These have been labeled test codes
This particular one is from test code 14.. I think.

But.. it would be even more helpful if you could explain why E doesn't sound right.. I thought it sounded parallel

hbs2012 (I do hope you make it to hbs All the best)

Ok now, we can eliminate E because it has the ambiguous "they". Who are they ?? locals ? detectives ?
Using this we can eliminate D as well.

Choice A has the redundant "and are". It is better to say Locals are x,y and z
Choice B "to be" and "and are" is not parallel.

This leaves us with choice C ( OA is C, Please check the answer key, Test 14 Pg.33 Section 6 10th question)

in E. 'that local witnesses are difficult to locate and reticent, and they are'

the usage of 'that' makes it clear that 'witnesses'is the subject for the later clause. hence they can be used to refer to witnesses. but the problem with this question is pure parallelism. choice C is clear winner because choice E adds a pronoun that is destroys the parallelism
Intern
Joined: 29 Jul 2010
Posts: 46
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 1

Re: RC: Federal Authorities, local witnesses [#permalink]

Show Tags

11 Sep 2010, 23:33
But, how is C parallel??
difficult to locate..
difficult to reticent..
and dificult to suspicious of strangers???
I think there is no parallelism..
somebody, pls explain
Manager
Joined: 25 Dec 2009
Posts: 66
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 2

Re: RC: Federal Authorities, local witnesses [#permalink]

Show Tags

12 Sep 2010, 06:39

choice E is TOTALLY wrong because 'they' here refers to federal authorities. you may ask why? it is so because a (comma and) structure shows a prallel clause and refers back to federal authrities. same with D

apart from the meaing change without the usage of 'that' in A and B, C corrects one more thing , i.e., ||ism

difficult to locate, reticent, and suspicious of

the parts marked in red are parallel. 'to locate' is an adverbial modifier that modifies 'difficult'. the 'to' in this case isnt the infinitive parallel structure u r looking for.
Manager
Joined: 08 Feb 2010
Posts: 143
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: RC: Federal Authorities, local witnesses [#permalink]

Show Tags

14 Sep 2010, 19:04
I think a should be correct
Manager
Joined: 25 Dec 2009
Posts: 66
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 2

Re: RC: Federal Authorities, local witnesses [#permalink]

Show Tags

15 Sep 2010, 08:17
this choice is simplt NOT correct. infact this is a sucker answer choice. let me try again.

federal authorities is the subject of the clause, 'have found' is the main verb and 'local withness' is the object of the main clause. now 'local witness' can not be object of the first part(Federal authorities involved in the investigation have found the local witnesses) of the sentence and at the same time be subject of the 2nd part(the local witnesses are difficult to locate, reticent, and are suspicious of strangers)
. we need a subordinator 'that' to solve this issue.

well even if u do not spot this grammatical errror, the biggest problem here is that meaning is nonsensical. as u know whenever and is used, u need to check for parallel structure. when you check parallel for 'and are', u will find the verb 'have found'. so the clause predeeding 'have found' applies even to 'are'.

so the meaning u get is
Federal authorities involved in the investigation are suspicious of strangers. this clause makes no sense
Re: RC: Federal Authorities, local witnesses   [#permalink] 15 Sep 2010, 08:17
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Author's tone 0 22 Jul 2010, 06:29
1 RC 3 24 Jun 2008, 23:25
RC 6 21 Jun 2008, 12:46
RC 2 27 Mar 2008, 02:28
RC: author’s attitude toward something in the passage 1 03 Jul 2007, 13:20
Display posts from previous: Sort by