rc1.png which of the follwoing if true would support the : GMAT Reading Comprehension (RC)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 17 Jan 2017, 05:14

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# rc1.png which of the follwoing if true would support the

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 16 Feb 2011
Posts: 193
Schools: ABCD
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 173 [0], given: 78

rc1.png which of the follwoing if true would support the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Sep 2012, 10:57
[img]rc1.png[/img]

which of the follwoing if true would support the assertion that the settlers of Mass Bay Colony "were concerned by entanglements between church and state"?

1) they established a body of government in the colony that barred ministers from holding public office
2) they disagreed with the governing foundation in England in which the Anglican Church was headed by the King.
3) early settlers wanted to assume their own freedom of religion

a - 1 and 2
b - 3
c - 2
d - 3 and 2
e - 1 and 3

OA states A.

Why is A) correct? Why would the barring of ministers frm holding public office be considered entanglement between the church and the state? for 1) to be true, I have to assume that ministers were from Church.

Thoughts?
Attachments

rc1.png [ 120.24 KiB | Viewed 1219 times ]

If you have any questions
New!
Moderator
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3085
Followers: 783

Kudos [?]: 6511 [0], given: 1007

### Show Tags

04 Sep 2012, 11:03
i sincerely do not understand nothing on how thi passage i formulate and the response........mah

I do not like veritas at all
_________________
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 7119
Location: Pune, India
Followers: 2130

Kudos [?]: 13629 [1] , given: 222

### Show Tags

04 Sep 2012, 21:54
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
voodoochild wrote:
[img]rc1.png[/img]

which of the follwoing if true would support the assertion that the settlers of Mass Bay Colony "were concerned by entanglements between church and state"?

1) they established a body of government in the colony that barred ministers from holding public office
2) they disagreed with the governing foundation in England in which the Anglican Church was headed by the King.
3) early settlers wanted to assume their own freedom of religion

a - 1 and 2
b - 3
c - 2
d - 3 and 2
e - 1 and 3

OA states A.

Why is A) correct? Why would the barring of ministers frm holding public office be considered entanglement between the church and the state? for 1) to be true, I have to assume that ministers were from Church.

Thoughts?

When we are talking about the way things were in US a couple of centuries ago, the word 'minister' refers to 'a member of the clergy; a religious minister' and is used in that way only here. It is not used in the context of 'Minister of State' or 'Finance Minister'.
If you have read something on skirmishes between the state and the church, you will see that 'minister' refers to a person from the church.
Now that I think about it, it may not be intuitive to people who read only newspapers. This is the reason we tell you that it is good to read books on different topics. The passage uses tricky language but you can easily figure out what it is telling you with some effort.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for $199 Veritas Prep Reviews Moderator Joined: 01 Sep 2010 Posts: 3085 Followers: 783 Kudos [?]: 6511 [0], given: 1007 Re: Veritas RC [#permalink] ### Show Tags 05 Sep 2012, 00:11 VeritasPrepKarishma wrote: voodoochild wrote: [img]rc1.png[/img] which of the follwoing if true would support the assertion that the settlers of Mass Bay Colony "were concerned by entanglements between church and state"? 1) they established a body of government in the colony that barred ministers from holding public office 2) they disagreed with the governing foundation in England in which the Anglican Church was headed by the King. 3) early settlers wanted to assume their own freedom of religion a - 1 and 2 b - 3 c - 2 d - 3 and 2 e - 1 and 3 OA states A. Why is A) correct? Why would the barring of ministers frm holding public office be considered entanglement between the church and the state? for 1) to be true, I have to assume that ministers were from Church. Thoughts? When we are talking about the way things were in US a couple of centuries ago, the word 'minister' refers to 'a member of the clergy; a religious minister' and is used in that way only here. It is not used in the context of 'Minister of State' or 'Finance Minister'. If you have read something on skirmishes between the state and the church, you will see that 'minister' refers to a person from the church. Now that I think about it, it may not be intuitive to people who read only newspapers. This is the reason we tell you that it is good to read books on different topics. The passage uses tricky language but you can easily figure out what it is telling you with some effort. with all my respect for you Karishma and your preparation (you have a lot of it) but in my personal opinion I see a bunch of RC passages from a wide variety of sources and NO ONE emulate in a good manner the offical ones. They seem more a paste and cut. OG Passages have, even when are really twisted, a fluency and a consistency. Anyway, Thanks for your work _________________ Manager Joined: 03 Jul 2012 Posts: 139 GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V36 GPA: 3.9 WE: Programming (Computer Software) Followers: 4 Kudos [?]: 92 [0], given: 16 Re: Veritas RC [#permalink] ### Show Tags 05 Sep 2012, 08:08 Even I got the answer A. Even if u don't know that The Ministers here are religious clerks, I think you can still answer the question. The passage says that the ppl settled in Mass Bay Colony fled England and were concerned about the entanglements between Church and the govt. So, it makes sense that they wanna keep govt ppl away from holding religious positions and vice-versa to avoid the effects of the Church on the govt. Makes sense? Correct me if I am wrong. Manager Joined: 16 Feb 2011 Posts: 193 Schools: ABCD Followers: 1 Kudos [?]: 173 [0], given: 78 Re: Veritas RC [#permalink] ### Show Tags 05 Sep 2012, 10:43 VeritasPrepKarishma wrote: voodoochild wrote: [img]rc1.png[/img] which of the follwoing if true would support the assertion that the settlers of Mass Bay Colony "were concerned by entanglements between church and state"? 1) they established a body of government in the colony that barred ministers from holding public office 2) they disagreed with the governing foundation in England in which the Anglican Church was headed by the King. 3) early settlers wanted to assume their own freedom of religion a - 1 and 2 b - 3 c - 2 d - 3 and 2 e - 1 and 3 OA states A. Why is A) correct? Why would the barring of ministers frm holding public office be considered entanglement between the church and the state? for 1) to be true, I have to assume that ministers were from Church. Thoughts? When we are talking about the way things were in US a couple of centuries ago, the word 'minister' refers to 'a member of the clergy; a religious minister' and is used in that way only here. It is not used in the context of 'Minister of State' or 'Finance Minister'. If you have read something on skirmishes between the state and the church, you will see that 'minister' refers to a person from the church. Now that I think about it, it may not be intuitive to people who read only newspapers. This is the reason we tell you that it is good to read books on different topics. The passage uses tricky language but you can easily figure out what it is telling you with some effort. Karishma, Thanks for your detailed response. The author doesn't state what happened in the new colonies. How do you know that ministers were from the Church? They could be native Americans too. The passage states that they were concerned about the entanglements between Church and govt in England (even 'UK'/'England' is not said), it doesn't state that such entanglements existed or possible in new colonies......I see your point about knowing outside stuff. I agree that this passage demands knowing something that's not supported in the passage. Please correct me if I am wrong - such answers by default are wrong in official guide/GMAT. Show me any one question that requires outside knowledge. There are a lot of passages in which answers can be false, if you know about the subject. For instance, there is a caffeine passage in OG....it's a good one. With the latest research, some of the answer choices are not supported at all, if you consider outside knowledge..... I am not sure whether this RC is GMATlike... Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor Joined: 16 Oct 2010 Posts: 7119 Location: Pune, India Followers: 2130 Kudos [?]: 13629 [0], given: 222 Re: Veritas RC [#permalink] ### Show Tags 05 Sep 2012, 20:19 voodoochild wrote: Karishma, Thanks for your detailed response. The author doesn't state what happened in the new colonies. How do you know that ministers were from the Church? They could be native Americans too. The passage states that they were concerned about the entanglements between Church and govt in England (even 'UK'/'England' is not said), it doesn't state that such entanglements existed or possible in new colonies......I see your point about knowing outside stuff. I agree that this passage demands knowing something that's not supported in the passage. Please correct me if I am wrong - such answers by default are wrong in official guide/GMAT. Show me any one question that requires outside knowledge. There are a lot of passages in which answers can be false, if you know about the subject. For instance, there is a caffeine passage in OG....it's a good one. With the latest research, some of the answer choices are not supported at all, if you consider outside knowledge..... I am not sure whether this RC is GMATlike... You need to learn to learn from your mistakes and then move on. Over analyzing only wastes time. As for this question requiring 'outside knowledge', it doesn't. I agree that some people may not immediately realize that 'minister' refers to 'members of the church'. It's something like the word 'difference'. For some people, difference between a and b implies 'a - b', for others it implies mod(a - b). Such words do appear in OG as well but we know that if GMAC finds cultural differences in performance of a particular question, they omit the question from the bank. For me and many others, the question is very straight forward because instinctively, minister implies church minister to us. They are after all talking about separating the state and the church. It may not be so for you. So learn and move on. _________________ Karishma Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor My Blog Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for$199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Re: Veritas RC   [#permalink] 05 Sep 2012, 20:19
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
The passage suggests that which of the following was true of Black... 1 30 May 2016, 04:36
9 Until recently, zoologists believed that all species of phocids (true 6 26 Jan 2015, 06:08
2 Relieving an improvished country of its debt would seem to 4 18 Apr 2011, 14:21
Investing in real estate would be a profitable venture at 1 02 Aug 2008, 03:46
Display posts from previous: Sort by