Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 23 Oct 2014, 10:57

Going on right now!

Interview Invites from Chicago - Booth | Join the chat room for Live Updates.


Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Reactivating deals that were put on hold may be unwise in

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Current Student
User avatar
Affiliations: SAE
Joined: 11 Jul 2012
Posts: 514
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.5
WE: Project Management (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 34

Kudos [?]: 132 [0], given: 269

Reactivating deals that were put on hold may be unwise in [#permalink] New post 03 Oct 2012, 20:08
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  35% (medium)

Question Stats:

67% (01:55) correct 33% (01:34) wrong based on 91 sessions
Reactivating deals that were put on hold may be unwise in some industries where fundamental changes during the crisis have weakened the competitive position of deal targets or hurt the structural attractiveness of their markets
A. where fundamental changes during the crisis have weakened the competitive position of deal targets or
B. in which fundamental changes during the crisis has weakened the competitive position of deal targets and
C. where fundamental changes during the crisis have weakened the competitive position of deal targets or
D. in which fundamental changes during the crisis have weakened the competitive position of deal targets or
E. where fundamental changes during the time of the crisis have weakened the competitive position of targets of the deal and
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

First Attempt 710 - first-attempt-141273.html


Last edited by getgyan on 04 Oct 2012, 19:33, edited 1 time in total.
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 08 Apr 2012
Posts: 129
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 60 [1] , given: 14

Re: Reactivating deals that were put [#permalink] New post 03 Oct 2012, 23:19
1
This post received
KUDOS
getgyan wrote:
Reactivating deals that were put on hold may be unwise in some industries where fundamental changes during the crisis have weakened the competitive position of deal targets or hurt the structural attractiveness of their markets
A. where fundamental changes during the crisis have weakened the competitive position of deal targets or
B. in which fundamental changes during the crisis has weakened the competitive position of deal targets and
C. where fundamental changes during the crisis have weakened the competitive position of deal targets or
D. in which fundamental changes during the crisis have weakened the competitive position of deal targets or
E. where fundamental changes during the time of the crisis have weakened the competitive position of targets of the deal and


<<Typo alert. A and C are the same.>>

The underlined portion is explaining "some industries". It is a situation "in" some industries. So "in which" is better suited than "where". The problem with (B) is the use of "has" with plural subject "fundamental changes". Thus (D) is the correct answer.
_________________

Shouvik
http://www.Edvento.com
admin@edvento.com

Current Student
User avatar
Affiliations: SAE
Joined: 11 Jul 2012
Posts: 514
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.5
WE: Project Management (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 34

Kudos [?]: 132 [0], given: 269

Re: Reactivating deals that were put [#permalink] New post 04 Oct 2012, 02:21
yashii9 wrote:
E is correct

Whats the OA?

In this question "where" incorrectly refers to industries. Edvento is correct
OA is D

:-D
_________________

First Attempt 710 - first-attempt-141273.html

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 31 Mar 2010
Posts: 139
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 61 [0], given: 38

Re: Reactivating deals that were put [#permalink] New post 04 Oct 2012, 02:35
getgyan wrote:
yashii9 wrote:
E is correct

Whats the OA?

In this question "where" incorrectly refers to industries. Edvento is correct
OA is D

:-D



I was caught between "or "& "and"
weakened x or hurt y -this didnt sound quite good to me
_________________

Push +1 kudos button please, if you like my post

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 04 Dec 2011
Posts: 26
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 3

Re: Reactivating deals that were put [#permalink] New post 04 Oct 2012, 06:58
where---incorrect cannot modify industries
changes---plural...so has not have


getgyan wrote:
Reactivating deals that were put on hold may be unwise in some industries where fundamental changes during the crisis have weakened the competitive position of deal targets or hurt the structural attractiveness of their markets
A. where fundamental changes during the crisis have weakened the competitive position of deal targets or--------wrong----where
B. in which fundamental changes during the crisis has weakened the competitive position of deal targets and----wrong----has
C. where fundamental changes during the crisis have weakened the competitive position of deal targets or---wrong----where
D. in which fundamental changes during the crisis have weakened the competitive position of deal targets or---correct
E. where fundamental changes during the time of the crisis have weakened the competitive position of targets of the deal and----wrong----where
2 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 28 Jun 2009
Posts: 456
Location: United States (MA)
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 109 [2] , given: 46

Re: Reactivating deals that were put [#permalink] New post 04 Oct 2012, 08:34
2
This post received
KUDOS
1st error : where vs in which
2nd error : S-V agreement, S - changes V - has/have

Correcting S-V agreement, we choose 'have'. So rule out options with 'has'. B is out.

'in which' is right. Because where can not modify industries. So rule of A, C and E. [A and C are identical, typo??]

D is the answer.
2 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Jun 2010
Posts: 363
Schools: IE'14, ISB'14, Kellogg'15
WE 1: 7 Yrs in Automobile (Commercial Vehicle industry)
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 173 [2] , given: 50

Reviews Badge
Re: Reactivating deals that were put [#permalink] New post 04 Oct 2012, 08:37
2
This post received
KUDOS
getgyan wrote:
Reactivating deals that were put on hold may be unwise in some industries where fundamental changes during the crisis have weakened the competitive position of deal targets or hurt the structural attractiveness of their markets
A. where fundamental changes during the crisis have weakened the competitive position of deal targets or
B. in which fundamental changes during the crisis has weakened the competitive position of deal targets and
C. where fundamental changes during the crisis have weakened the competitive position of deal targets or
D. in which fundamental changes during the crisis have weakened the competitive position of deal targets or
E. where fundamental changes during the time of the crisis have weakened the competitive position of targets of the deal and


Here only 2 thing we have to take care. "Where Vs which" and "and Vs or"

As per the context if something is weakened then we can not hurt that again. So the usage will be weakened...or hurt. Is is similar to an OG question where some cattles were injured or killed. (Same applies here injured & kills does not make sense).
B has SV agreement error too
In which correctly modifies industries.
So Answer is D.
_________________

Regards
SD
-----------------------------
Press Kudos if you like my post.
Debrief 610-540-580-710(Long Journey): from-600-540-580-710-finally-achieved-in-4th-attempt-142456.html

1 KUDOS received
Current Student
User avatar
Affiliations: SAE
Joined: 11 Jul 2012
Posts: 514
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.5
WE: Project Management (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 34

Kudos [?]: 132 [1] , given: 269

Re: Reactivating deals that were put [#permalink] New post 04 Oct 2012, 19:39
1
This post received
KUDOS
SOURH7WK wrote:
Here only 2 thing we have to take care. "Where Vs which" and "and Vs or"

As per the context if something is weakened then we can not hurt that again. So the usage will be weakened...or hurt. Is is similar to an OG question where some cattles were injured or killed. (Same applies here injured & kills does not make sense).
B has SV agreement error too
In which correctly modifies industries.
So Answer is D.


We are not weakening and hurting the same thing. We are weakening the competitive position of deal targets and hurting the the structural attractiveness of their markets

Any thoughts? :-D

yashii9 wrote:
I was caught between "or "& "and"
weakened x or hurt y -this didnt sound quite good to me


The thing is "and" is not wrong here, rather the options which has "and" are wrong.
We cannot be sure of the intent of the author and therefore "and" and "or" are both correct in this context.

Let us look at the two options which has "and"

B. in which fundamental changes during the crisis has weakened the competitive position of deal targets and (has is wrong verb for changes, it should be have, eliminate)
E. where fundamental changes during the time of the crisis have weakened the competitive position of targets of the deal and ("where" incorrectly refers to industries, eliminate)

Don't you think so? Any thoughts?

:-D
_________________

First Attempt 710 - first-attempt-141273.html

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 31 Mar 2010
Posts: 139
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 61 [0], given: 38

Re: Reactivating deals that were put [#permalink] New post 04 Oct 2012, 19:44
getgyan wrote:
SOURH7WK wrote:
Here only 2 thing we have to take care. "Where Vs which" and "and Vs or"

As per the context if something is weakened then we can not hurt that again. So the usage will be weakened...or hurt. Is is similar to an OG question where some cattles were injured or killed. (Same applies here injured & kills does not make sense).
B has SV agreement error too
In which correctly modifies industries.
So Answer is D.


We are not weakening and hurting the same thing. We are weakening the competitive position of deal targets and hurting the the structural attractiveness of their markets

Any thoughts? :-D

yashii9 wrote:
I was caught between "or "& "and"
weakened x or hurt y -this didnt sound quite good to me


The thing is "and" is not wrong here, rather the options which has "and" are wrong.
We cannot be sure of the intent of the author and therefore "and" and "or" are both correct in this context.

Let us look at the two options which has "and"

B. in which fundamental changes during the crisis has weakened the competitive position of deal targets and (has is wrong verb for changes, it should be have, eliminate)
E. where fundamental changes during the time of the crisis have weakened the competitive position of targets of the deal and ("where" incorrectly refers to industries, eliminate)

Don't you think so? Any thoughts?

:-D


Of course makes sense :)

I was too stupid to eliminate all the choices with or and then eliminated B coz of "has"

:)
_________________

Push +1 kudos button please, if you like my post

Director
Director
avatar
Status: Gonna rock this time!!!
Joined: 22 Jul 2012
Posts: 549
Location: India
GMAT 1: 640 Q43 V34
GMAT 2: 630 Q47 V29
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 562

Re: Reactivating deals that were put on hold may be unwise in [#permalink] New post 08 Feb 2013, 21:08
The Official answer explanation also states that the correct connector is 'or' and not 'and'.
Could you please throw some light as to why 'or' is correct?
_________________

hope is a good thing, maybe the best of things. And no good thing ever dies.

Who says you need a 700 ?Check this out : http://gmatclub.com/forum/who-says-you-need-a-149706.html#p1201595

My GMAT Journey : end-of-my-gmat-journey-149328.html#p1197992

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 10 Feb 2014
Posts: 73
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 25

GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
Reactivating deals that were put on hold may be unwise in [#permalink] New post 22 Jun 2014, 09:22
Reactivating deals that were put on hold may be unwise in some industries where
fundamental changes during the crisis have weakened the competitive position of deal
targets or
hurt the structural attractiveness of their markets

A. where fundamental changes during the crisis have weakened the competitive
position of deal targets or

B. in which fundamental changes during the crisis has weakened the competitive
position of deal targets and

C. where fundamental changes during the crisis have weakened the competitive
position of deal targets or

D. in which fundamental changes during the crisis have weakened the
competitive position of deal targets or

E. where fundamental changes during the time of the crisis have weakened the
competitive position of targets of the deal and

Last edited by Gnpth on 23 Jun 2014, 07:02, edited 1 time in total.
Merging similar topic
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 24 Oct 2013
Posts: 163
Location: Canada
GMAT 1: Q49 V38
WE: Design (Transportation)
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 81

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: Reactivating deals that were put on hold [#permalink] New post 22 Jun 2014, 17:19
Just by the way, Option A and C are same! You might wanna check that again. :)
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 05 Sep 2010
Posts: 659
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 102 [0], given: 37

Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: Reactivating deals that were put on hold [#permalink] New post 22 Jun 2014, 23:41
Quote:
Just by the way, Option A and C are same! You might wanna check that again. :)

good observation !!


i marked C in this SC and i find no reason as why "where" cannot refer to "some industries" . if "where" can refer to metaphorical places such as "societies" in real GMAC question then "where" can refer to "some industries"
Expert Post
2 KUDOS received
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 4877
Location: Pune, India
Followers: 1154

Kudos [?]: 5369 [2] , given: 165

Re: Reactivating deals that were put on hold [#permalink] New post 23 Jun 2014, 00:27
2
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
aditya8062 wrote:
Quote:
Just by the way, Option A and C are same! You might wanna check that again. :)

good observation !!


i marked C in this SC and i find no reason as why "where" cannot refer to "some industries" . if "where" can refer to metaphorical places such as "societies" in real GMAC question then "where" can refer to "some industries"


Responding to a pm:

You need to look for the best option among the given choices.

The have/has decision point is suitably dealt with in (A), (C), (D) and (E).

While referring to "some industries", the use of "in which" is certainly better than the use of "where" - which usually signifies a physical place. Only (D) uses "in which" and is the answer.

Answer (D)
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Save $100 on Veritas Prep GMAT Courses And Admissions Consulting
Enroll now. Pay later. Take advantage of Veritas Prep's flexible payment plan options.

Veritas Prep Reviews

Re: Reactivating deals that were put on hold   [#permalink] 23 Jun 2014, 00:27
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Reactivating deals that were put on hold Game 0 23 Jun 2014, 00:27
Reactivating deals that were put on hold may be unwise in therock 5 16 Mar 2011, 22:41
In Roman times, defeated enemies were generally put to death rainfall 6 03 Dec 2009, 02:03
I was on the Subway this morning, and people were holding mendelay 3 06 Oct 2009, 06:06
BW - Many are putting their MBA dreams on hold... nink 0 09 Jan 2009, 05:51
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Reactivating deals that were put on hold may be unwise in

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.