Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 16 Apr 2014, 12:25

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Really did'nt understand how they approached this

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 25 Oct 2008
Posts: 612
Location: Kolkata,India
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 117 [0], given: 100

GMAT Tests User
Really did'nt understand how they approached this [#permalink] New post 31 Oct 2009, 13:02
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Really did'nt understand how they approached this question!!Please help :)
Attachments

3.JPG
3.JPG [ 41.26 KiB | Viewed 853 times ]


_________________

countdown-beginshas-ended-85483-40.html#p649902

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 29 Oct 2009
Posts: 211
Followers: 64

Kudos [?]: 519 [0], given: 18

GMAT Tests User
Re: Og 11 #78 [#permalink] New post 31 Oct 2009, 14:09
I'd go with C.

to find the length of QR, we have to know both the y coordinates of Q and R.
similarly, to find length of PR, we have to know both the x coordinates of P and R.

Thus, each statement by itself is insufficient to determine the lengths and hence the ratio.

alternately, the ratio of the lengths can be given by tan(x). where 'x' denotes the slope of the line PQ. In order to find the slope, it is necessary to know both the x and y coordinates of 2 points on the line.

Thus again we can see that each statement by itself would be insufficient but together they would be sufficient.

In this case, length of QR = 4 - (-1) = 5
length of PR = 3 - (-2) = 5

therefore ratio is 1.


whats the OA?
_________________

Click below to check out some great tips and tricks to help you deal with problems on Remainders!
compilation-of-tips-and-tricks-to-deal-with-remainders-86714.html#p651942

Word Problems Made Easy!
1) Translating the English to Math : word-problems-made-easy-87346.html
2) 'Work' Problems Made Easy : work-word-problems-made-easy-87357.html
3) 'Distance/Speed/Time' Word Problems Made Easy : distance-speed-time-word-problems-made-easy-87481.html

Intern
Intern
Joined: 25 Oct 2009
Posts: 24
Schools: Wharton, HBS, Stanford
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 12

Re: Og 11 #78 [#permalink] New post 31 Oct 2009, 14:14
I don't know how OG approached this, but I think in the following way:

the question is "Is QR=PR?"

Given that QR and PR are both parallel to one of axes, their lenths is

for vertical Yh-Yl, or d-b in our case, and
for horizontal Xh-Xl, or c-a.

Refrased question is "Is d-b=c-a?"

Each statement gives coordinate only for one point, each statement alone is NOT SUFFICIENT, but together SUFFICIENT.

The answer is C.

KUDOS if you find it helpful ;)
_________________

KUDOS if you find it helpful ;)

Intern
Intern
Joined: 03 Oct 2009
Posts: 38
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Schools: NY Stern; Columbia; Cornell; Waterloo; U of T
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 8

Re: Og 11 #78 [#permalink] New post 31 Oct 2009, 15:26
tejal777 wrote:
Really did'nt understand how they approached this question!!Please help :)


The Q boield down to is PR = QR? --> PR to be = QR --> Angle P = Angle Q. We know that Angle R is a Right angle. --> P+Q = 90. But d/n know their ratio.--> So, we need the co-ordinates of both the points P and Q to measure the length of PR /QR. No info is given about the Triangle PQR (i.e. is it a 30-60-90 triangle). But I understand that If we extend PR, QR is extended proportionately (right triangle theorem).

I would go with C, as neither of the statements is enough to have the slope of the traingle PQR.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 25 Oct 2008
Posts: 612
Location: Kolkata,India
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 117 [0], given: 100

GMAT Tests User
Re: Og 11 #78 [#permalink] New post 01 Nov 2009, 19:55
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 25 Oct 2008
Posts: 612
Location: Kolkata,India
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 117 [0], given: 100

GMAT Tests User
Re: Og 11 #78 [#permalink] New post 02 Nov 2009, 05:09
Could somebody show the workings?
_________________

countdown-beginshas-ended-85483-40.html#p649902

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 29 Oct 2009
Posts: 211
Followers: 64

Kudos [?]: 519 [0], given: 18

GMAT Tests User
Re: Og 11 #78 [#permalink] New post 02 Nov 2009, 05:15
hey,
which part of the solutions above did you have a difficulty in following?
i'll be glad to explain it in a little more detail if you let me know.
cheers!
_________________

Click below to check out some great tips and tricks to help you deal with problems on Remainders!
compilation-of-tips-and-tricks-to-deal-with-remainders-86714.html#p651942

Word Problems Made Easy!
1) Translating the English to Math : word-problems-made-easy-87346.html
2) 'Work' Problems Made Easy : work-word-problems-made-easy-87357.html
3) 'Distance/Speed/Time' Word Problems Made Easy : distance-speed-time-word-problems-made-easy-87481.html

1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 18 Aug 2009
Posts: 333
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 146 [1] , given: 13

GMAT Tests User
Re: Og 11 #78 [#permalink] New post 02 Nov 2009, 05:31
1
This post received
KUDOS
Consider point R as R(e, f)

Statement 1) C=3
From this statement you can draw a conclusion that e=3 as QR is parallel to Y-axis. But we do not know the value of f. So Insufficient.

Statement 2) B=-1
From this statement you can draw a conclusion that f=-1 as PR is parallel to X-axis. But we do not know the value of e. So Insufficient.

Together, we know that e=3 & f=-1. So R(e,f) = R(3, -1)

Now you can find out the distance between P & R, and R & Q:
Dist between P & R = \sqrt{(-2-3)^2+(-1-(-1))^2}=5
Dist between Q & R = \sqrt{(3-3)^2+(4-(-1))^2}=5

So Statement 1 and 2 together are sufficient.
Remember, you don't need to calculate the distances to answer the questions. You just need to know if the distances can be calculated using Statement 1 and 2.

Questions? Shoot...
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 29 Oct 2009
Posts: 211
Followers: 64

Kudos [?]: 519 [0], given: 18

GMAT Tests User
Re: Og 11 #78 [#permalink] New post 02 Nov 2009, 05:39
choice C is correct because when data from both statements is provided (that is the coordinates of both the points) it can be possible to determine the lengths of both the lines.

since it is given that QR is parallel to the y-axis and PR is parallel to x-axis, we can find the coordinates of point R.

the x coordinate for R will be the same as that of Q (which is point c)
and the y coordinate will be the same as that of P (which is point b)

therefore coordinates of R will be (c,b)

now in order to calculate the length of QR, we need the y coordinates of both Q and R.. that is points d and b.
(the x coordinates are not necessary since we know that the line is parallel to the y axis.)

similarly, to calculate the length of PR, we need the x coordinates of both P and R.. that is points a and c.
(the y coordinates are not necessary because we know that the line is parallel to x axis.)

thus if we know the numerical value of the points represented by a,b,c and d, we can find the lengths of both the lines (QR and PR).

now, if we know the lengths of both the lines, we can easily find the ratio and see whether or not it will be equal to 1.

if there is any particular statement in my explanation where you loose the flow or cannot understand, just let me know!

hope this helps!

cheers!
_________________

Click below to check out some great tips and tricks to help you deal with problems on Remainders!
compilation-of-tips-and-tricks-to-deal-with-remainders-86714.html#p651942

Word Problems Made Easy!
1) Translating the English to Math : word-problems-made-easy-87346.html
2) 'Work' Problems Made Easy : work-word-problems-made-easy-87357.html
3) 'Distance/Speed/Time' Word Problems Made Easy : distance-speed-time-word-problems-made-easy-87481.html

Re: Og 11 #78   [#permalink] 02 Nov 2009, 05:39
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts Attached. Couldnt really understand it crackgmat750 9 08 Aug 2004, 17:16
New posts DIDNT QUITE UNDERSTAND THIS... arjtryarjtry 3 01 Sep 2008, 17:23
New posts hmm. i didnt quite understand this... arjtryarjtry 5 11 Sep 2008, 18:48
New posts Not sure I understand what it is asking or how to approach hartattack11 2 22 Mar 2010, 07:34
New posts Experts publish their posts in the topic How to approach this ? hafgola 3 20 Sep 2011, 02:07
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Really did'nt understand how they approached this

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.