Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Rebecca runs at a constant rate on the treadmill and it take [#permalink]

Show Tags

14 Jun 2013, 11:06

1

This post received KUDOS

7

This post was BOOKMARKED

00:00

A

B

C

D

E

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

43% (04:52) correct
57% (03:40) wrong based on 89 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Rebecca runs at a constant rate on the treadmill and it takes her 2 hours longer to reach a certain milestone than the time it takes Jeff to reach that same milestone. If Jeff also moves at a constant rate and the two are allowed to combine their distances traveled to reach 25% beyond the initial milestone in 3 hours, how many hours would it take for Rebecca alone to reach the equivalent distance of 2 milestones?

Re: Rebecca runs at a constant rate on the treadmill and it take [#permalink]

Show Tags

19 Jun 2013, 22:05

targetbschool wrote:

Don't we have to take 25% of combined distance ( 1+1) = 5/2 ?

The wording may be a bit confusing, but "the two are allowed to combine their distances traveled to reach 25% beyond the initial milestone in 3 hours" is supposed to be equivalent to:

In 3 hours, if R and J travel at their constant rates, their combined distance is 25% beyond the initial milestone.

So indeed it should be 3 * (R + J) = 5/4 * milestone. _________________

Re: Rebecca runs at a constant rate on the treadmill and it take [#permalink]

Show Tags

20 Jun 2013, 16:56

mattce wrote:

targetbschool wrote:

Don't we have to take 25% of combined distance ( 1+1) = 5/2 ?

The wording may be a bit confusing, but "the two are allowed to combine their distances traveled to reach 25% beyond the initial milestone in 3 hours" is supposed to be equivalent to:

In 3 hours, if R and J travel at their constant rates, their combined distance is 25% beyond the initial milestone.

So indeed it should be 3 * (R + J) = 5/4 * milestone.

Even I thought wordings are confusing.... Not sure how will I tackle such Q in actual Exam?

Thanks! _________________

"Where are my Kudos" ............ Good Question = kudos

Re: Rebecca runs at a constant rate on the treadmill and it take [#permalink]

Show Tags

20 Jun 2013, 22:09

targetbschool wrote:

Zarrolou wrote:

\(R*(t+2)=1 milestone\) \(J*t=1 milestone\)

\((R+J)*3=\frac{5}{4} milestones\)

From the upper equations get the rate for R and J \(R=\frac{1}{t+2}\) and \(J=\frac{1}{t}\), now substitute them into the lower equation

\((\frac{1}{t+2}+\frac{1}{t})*3=\frac{5}{4}\)

Solve for t and you get \(t=4\)

So Rebecca alone to reaches 1 milestone in \(4+2=6\) hours => two milestones in 12 IMO E

Don't we have to take 25% of combined distance ( 1+1) = 5/2 ?

The text is a bit complicated, however the equation ( 1+1) = 5/2 cannot be the one we are looking for as \(2\neq{\frac{5}{2}}\). We have to write this condition with the speed*time=space relationship _________________

It is beyond a doubt that all our knowledge that begins with experience.

Re: Rebecca runs at a constant rate on the treadmill and it take [#permalink]

Show Tags

07 Aug 2013, 14:56

Rebecca runs at a constant rate on the treadmill and it takes her 2 hours longer to reach a certain milestone than the time it takes Jeff to reach that same milestone. If Jeff also moves at a constant rate and the two are allowed to combine their distances traveled to reach 25% beyond the initial milestone in 3 hours, how many hours would it take for Rebecca alone to reach the equivalent distance of 2 milestones?

Milestone = d

Rebecca = t+2 Jeff = t

1.25 = r*3

Rebecca: d=r*(t+2) Jeff: d = r*(t)

r*t=1.25d (d/t+2 + d/t)*3 = 1.25d

Could someone explain to me why 1.) you use 1 and 5/4 instead of d and 2.) how to simplify? Thanks!

Re: Rebecca runs at a constant rate on the treadmill and it take [#permalink]

Show Tags

09 Sep 2014, 07:24

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email. _________________

Re: Rebecca runs at a constant rate on the treadmill and it take [#permalink]

Show Tags

19 Jun 2015, 23:41

1

This post received KUDOS

Lapetiteflo wrote:

How do you derive so easily the solution for t from this 2nd order equation ?? It takes me at least 3 minutes

After you get here, (1/t+2 + 1/t)∗3=5/4, Take 3 to the other side, and it becomes (1/t+2 +1/t) = 5/12. Now look at the answer choices, t has to be a number divisible by 12. So either A, B or E. Replace t with A or 4. And you quickly see that 1/6 + 1/4 = 5/12. Therefore, t is 4. Don't over complicate things by trying to calculate everything. You can apply this strategy to a lot of questions and save time.

http://blog.ryandumlao.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/IMG_20130807_232118.jpg The GMAT is the biggest point of worry for most aspiring applicants, and with good reason. It’s another standardized test when most of us...

I recently returned from attending the London Business School Admits Weekend held last week. Let me just say upfront - for those who are planning to apply for the...