|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 21 Apr 2008
Posts: 501
Schools: Kellogg, MIT, Michigan, Berkeley, Marshall, Mellon
Followers: 4
Kudos [?]:
20
[0], given: 13
|
Recent cosmological advances have made it possible to [#permalink]
08 Mar 2009, 10:20
Question Stats:
57% (01:32) correct
42% (00:41) wrong based on 149 sessions
Recent cosmological advances have made it possible to observe stellar objects that would only a decade ago have been unable to be viewed. (A) it possible to observe stellar objects that would only a decade ago have been unable to be viewed (B) it possible to observe stellar objects that would have been invisible only a decade ago (C) possible that one can observe stellar objects invisible only a decade ago (D) possible the observing of stellar objects that were not capable of being viewed only a decade ago (E) possible the observing of stellar objects that only a decade ago would not have been able to be viewed please explain Source: Princeton Reviewoa es segunda letra
_________________
mates, please visit my profile and leave comments johnlewis1980-s-profile-feedback-is-more-than-welcome-80538.html
I'm not linked to GMAT questions anymore, so, if you need something, please PM me
I'm already focused on my application package 
My experience in my second attempt http://gmatclub.com/forum/p544312#p544312 My experience in my third attempt 630-q-47-v-28-engineer-non-native-speaker-my-experience-78215.html#p588275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 1442
Followers: 28
Kudos [?]:
153
[1] , given: 1
|
Re: SC - Cosmological advances [#permalink]
09 Mar 2009, 16:32
1
This post received KUDOS
JohnLewis1980 wrote: Recent cosmological advances have made it possible to observe stellar objects that would only a decade ago have been unable to be viewed.A idem B it possible to observe stellar objects that would have been invisible only a decade ago C possible that one can observe stellar objects invisible only a decade ago D possible the observing of stellar objects that were not capable of being viewed only a decade ago E possible the observing of stellar objects that only a decade ago would not have been able to be viewed please explain Source: Princeton Reviewoa es segunda letraWhile I agree that it/they are two pronouns that one needs to be very careful with, there are exceptions observing of?? Outright wrong. D & E out possible that?? Also C does not show that they have not been visible until now. So Now it is down to A & B. It is raining now. Is the usage of it wrong? No. Similarly, the it here is benign. We can let A go as it moves the invisible part away. B is good as it moves the invisible part and also captures the part that these objects have been invisible for a decade with continuous tense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 03 Mar 2009
Posts: 49
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
31
[0], given: 3
|
Re: SC - Cosmological advances [#permalink]
08 Mar 2009, 14:13
E i think... B changes the meaning by replacing "unable to be viewed" with "invisible".
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 27 Feb 2009
Posts: 62
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
Re: SC - Cosmological advances [#permalink]
08 Mar 2009, 15:12
A or E...
Is it really necessary here?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 30 Nov 2008
Posts: 497
Schools: Fuqua
Followers: 9
Kudos [?]:
101
[0], given: 15
|
Re: SC - Cosmological advances [#permalink]
08 Mar 2009, 20:30
It is ambiguois. Hence A and B are out of the race.
C is out of the race since it changes the meaning of the original sentence. Also the first part of the sentence"Recent cosmological advances have made possible that...." is not a complete clause.
Between D and E, eliminated D due to the presence of BEING.
Left with E as ans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 889
Followers: 6
Kudos [?]:
89
[0], given: 7
|
Re: SC - Cosmological advances [#permalink]
09 Mar 2009, 01:13
A. 1. "invisible" changes the meaning. 2. The use of reference word "it" keeps the sentence straight - e.g. E makes a very awkward reading JohnLewis1980 wrote: Recent cosmological advances have made it possible to observe stellar objects that would only a decade ago have been unable to be viewed.A idem B it possible to observe stellar objects that would have been invisible only a decade ago C possible that one can observe stellar objects invisible only a decade ago D possible the observing of stellar objects that were not capable of being viewed only a decade ago E possible the observing of stellar objects that only a decade ago would not have been able to be viewed please explain Source: Princeton Reviewoa es segunda letra
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 09 Mar 2009
Posts: 10
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
Re: SC - Cosmological advances [#permalink]
09 Mar 2009, 06:08
JohnLewis1980 wrote: Recent cosmological advances have made it possible to observe stellar objects that would only a decade ago have been unable to be viewed.A idem B it possible to observe stellar objects that would have been invisible only a decade ago C possible that one can observe stellar objects invisible only a decade ago D possible the observing of stellar objects that were not capable of being viewed only a decade ago E possible the observing of stellar objects that only a decade ago would not have been able to be viewed please explain Source: Princeton Reviewoa es segunda letra=> In A and B , it is not clear what "it" is referring to C changes the meaning of the sentence. The sentence in C says Stellar objects were invisible a decade ago. In D the " were not capable of being viewed "construction is awkward E by POE.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Nov 2008
Posts: 309
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
17
[0], given: 7
|
Re: SC - Cosmological advances [#permalink]
12 Mar 2009, 01:42
should be B .. IT - Explitive . WOULD - introduced hypothetical past condition ... OA Pls !!
_________________
"CEO in making"
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 07 Nov 2007
Posts: 1837
Location: New York
Followers: 20
Kudos [?]:
296
[0], given: 5
|
Re: SC - Cosmological advances [#permalink]
12 Mar 2009, 08:06
I completely agree with botirvoy. I chose A too..(eventhough sentence is little awkward) B changes the meaning...by using' "invisible" You are not able to see --> doesn't mean that --> they are invisible.. probably you don't have capability to view the same decade ago.... Now you have that capability... to view the same.
_________________
Your attitude determines your altitude Smiling wins more friends than frowning
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 02 Mar 2009
Posts: 138
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
24
[0], given: 0
|
Re: SC - Cosmological advances [#permalink]
12 Mar 2009, 09:49
I shall go with B. It sounds the best.
Mr. JohnLewis..can you please post the official answer?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 21 Apr 2008
Posts: 501
Schools: Kellogg, MIT, Michigan, Berkeley, Marshall, Mellon
Followers: 4
Kudos [?]:
20
[0], given: 13
|
Re: SC - Cosmological advances [#permalink]
14 Mar 2009, 11:04
Hi Mates, OA is BThanks for your explanations Cheers
_________________
mates, please visit my profile and leave comments johnlewis1980-s-profile-feedback-is-more-than-welcome-80538.html
I'm not linked to GMAT questions anymore, so, if you need something, please PM me
I'm already focused on my application package 
My experience in my second attempt http://gmatclub.com/forum/p544312#p544312 My experience in my third attempt 630-q-47-v-28-engineer-non-native-speaker-my-experience-78215.html#p588275
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 16 Dec 2009
Posts: 2
Location: NYC
Schools: St. Josephs University, Daniels College (University of Denver)
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
Re: SC - Cosmological advances [#permalink]
25 Dec 2009, 17:15
I went with B, but can't back it up with anything besides a gut feeling that it was the right answer.
_________________
"Sometimes I wonder whether the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on or by imbeciles who really mean it." Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 27 May 2009
Posts: 223
Followers: 5
Kudos [?]:
29
[0], given: 2
|
Re: SC - Cosmological advances [#permalink]
26 Dec 2009, 00:35
JohnLewis1980 wrote: Recent cosmological advances have made it possible to observe stellar objects that would only a decade ago have been unable to be viewed.A idem B it possible to observe stellar objects that would have been invisible only a decade ago C possible that one can observe stellar objects invisible only a decade ago D possible the observing of stellar objects that were not capable of being viewed only a decade ago E possible the observing of stellar objects that only a decade ago would not have been able to be viewed please explain Source: Princeton Reviewoa es segunda letraA idem - wordyB it possible to observe stellar objects that would have been invisible only a decade ago - best option CORRECT - short and clearC possible that one can observe stellar objects invisible only a decade ago - objects were there but not visible to us. So, it cannot be invisible objects D possible the observing of stellar objects that were not capable of being viewed only a decade ago - to observe is correct E possible the observing of stellar objects that only a decade ago would not have been able to be viewed - wordy and to observe is correct
_________________
I do not suffer from insanity. I enjoy every minute of it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 01 Aug 2008
Posts: 775
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
33
[0], given: 99
|
Re: SC - Cosmological advances [#permalink]
26 Dec 2009, 11:22
I will go with A here.
B changes the meaning. it says "objects invisible only a decade ago", meaning thse objects were invicible a decade ago but not visible now, right?
B is better grammer wise but gives a different meaning.
IMO A.
Last edited by ugimba on 27 Dec 2009, 20:45, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 02 Oct 2009
Posts: 198
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
13
[0], given: 4
|
Re: SC - Cosmological advances [#permalink]
27 Dec 2009, 20:37
B
lack of 'it' makes connection or qualification harder for c,d,e
|
|
|
|
|
|
Verbal GMAT Forum Moderator
Joined: 31 Jan 2010
Posts: 500
WE 1: 4 years Tech
Followers: 8
Kudos [?]:
67
[0], given: 149
|
Re: SC - Cosmological advances [#permalink]
04 Jan 2011, 01:18
GmatGuruNy is Princeton Review instructor . Gotta PM him for clarifications.Invisible does change the meaning
_________________
My Post Invites Discussions not answers Try to give back something to the Forum.I want your explanations, right now ! Please let me know your opinion about the Chandigarh Gmat Centrehttp://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-experience-at-chandigarh-india-centre-111830.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
Verbal GMAT Forum Moderator
Joined: 31 Jan 2010
Posts: 500
WE 1: 4 years Tech
Followers: 8
Kudos [?]:
67
[0], given: 149
|
Re: SC - Cosmological advances [#permalink]
04 Jan 2011, 12:59
No Point giving answers without explanations
_________________
My Post Invites Discussions not answers Try to give back something to the Forum.I want your explanations, right now ! Please let me know your opinion about the Chandigarh Gmat Centrehttp://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-experience-at-chandigarh-india-centre-111830.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 01 Jan 2011
Posts: 90
Schools: INSEAD,IIMA,IIMB
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 2
|
Re: SC - Cosmological advances [#permalink]
09 Jan 2011, 02:01
made it possible is correct...from A and B ...B fits well.
_________________
_________________________ Try and you will succeed !
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 07 Jul 2010
Posts: 103
Location: Hanoi, Vietnam
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
5
[0], given: 18
|
Re: SC - Cosmological advances [#permalink]
09 Jan 2011, 02:07
E is the best because its not only grammatically right but also concise.
_________________
Hung M.Tran Faculty of Banking and Finance, National Economics University of Vietnam
Follow me on Twitter : http://twitter.com/AndyTranHung
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Oct 2010
Posts: 267
Location: India
GMAT 1: 560 Q36 V31
GPA: 3
Followers: 5
Kudos [?]:
14
[0], given: 24
|
Re: SC - Cosmological advances [#permalink]
07 Feb 2011, 10:00
andysimple wrote: E is the best because its not only grammatically right but also concise. Hi Andy, Just checking but E doesn't seem concise. In fact, B is my choice.
_________________
petrifiedbutstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: SC - Cosmological advances
[#permalink]
07 Feb 2011, 10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
tuanquang269, Vercules, Legendaddy, noboru, Marcab, metallicafan, rajeevrks27, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, souvik101990, doe007, MacFauz, PTK, carcass, kissthegmat, Narenn, GetThisDone
|