Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 02 May 2016, 18:12
GMAT Club Tests


GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance


we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Recent years have brought minority-owned businesses in the

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message

Hide Tags

1 KUDOS received
User avatar
Joined: 07 Dec 2011
Posts: 104
Location: India
Concentration: International Business, Strategy
GMAT Date: 07-30-2012
GPA: 2.66
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 36

Kudos [?]: 292 [1] , given: 116

Recent years have brought minority-owned businesses in the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jun 2012, 03:35
This post received
Recent years have brought minority-owned businesses in the United States unprecedented opportunities—as well as new and significant risks. Civil rights activists have long argued that one of the principal reasons why Blacks, Hispanics, and other minority groups have difficulty establishing themselves in business is that they lack access to the sizable orders and subcontracts that are generated by large companies. Now Congress, in apparent agreement, has required by law that businesses awarded federal contracts of more than $500,000 do their best to find minority subcontractors and record their efforts to do so on forms filed with the government. Indeed, some federal and local agencies have gone so far as to set specific percentage goals for apportioning parts of public works contracts to minority enterprises.
Corporate response appears to have been substantial. According to figures collected in 1977, the total of corporate contracts with minority businesses rose from $77 million in 1972 to $1.1 billion in 1977. The projected total of corporate contracts with minority businesses for the early 1980’s is estimated to be over 53 billion per year with no letup anticipated in the next decade. Promising as it is for minority businesses, this increased patronage poses dangers for them, too. First, minority firms risk expanding too fast and overextending themselves financially, since most are small concerns and, unlike large businesses, they often need to make substantial investments in new plants, staff, equipment, and the like in order to perform work subcontracted to them. If, thereafter, their subcontracts are for some reason reduced, such firms can face potentially crippling fixed expenses. The world of corporate purchasing can be frustrating for small entrepreneurs who get requests for elaborate formal estimates and bids. Both consume valuable time and resources, and a small company’s efforts must soon result in orders, or both the morale and the financial health of the business will suffer.
A second risk is that White-owned companies may seek to cash in on the increasing apportionments through formation of joint ventures with minority-owned concerns. Of course, in many instances there are legitimate reasons for joint ventures; clearly, White and minority enterprises can team up to acquire business that neither could acquire alone. But civil rights groups and minority business owners have complained to Congress about minorities being set up as “fronts” with White backing, rather than being accepted as full partners in legitimate joint ventures.
Third, a minority enterprise that secures the business of one large corporate customer often runs the danger of becoming—and remaining—dependent. Even in the best of circumstances, fierce competition from larger, more established companies makes it difficult for small concerns to broaden their customer bases: when such firms have nearly guaranteed orders from a single corporate benefactor, they may truly have to struggle against complacency arising from their current success.

The passage suggests that the failure of a large business to have its bids for subcontracts result quickly in orders might cause it to
(A) experience frustration but not serious financial harm
(B) face potentially crippling fixed expenses
(C) have to record its efforts on forms filed with the government
(D) increase its spending with minority subcontractors
(E) revise its procedure for making bids for federal contracts and subcontracts

The passage supplies information that would answer which of the following questions?
(A) What federal agencies have set percentage goals for the use of minority-owned businesses in public works contracts?
(B) To which government agencies must businesses awarded federal contracts report their efforts to find minority subcontractors?
(C) How widespread is the use of minority-owned concerns as “fronts” by White backers seeking to obtain subcontracts?
(D) How many more minority-owned businesses were there in 1977 than in 1972?
(E) What is one set of conditions under which a small business might find itself financially overextended?

It can be inferred from the passage that, compared with the requirements of law, the percentage goals set by “some federal and local agencies” (lines 14-15) are
(A) more popular with large corporations
(B) more specific
(C) less controversial
(D) less expensive to enforce
(E) easier to comply with

The author would most likely agree with which of the following statements about corporate response to working with minority subcontractors?
(A) Annoyed by the proliferation of “front” organizations, corporations are likely to reduce their efforts to work with minority-owned subcontractors in the near future.
(B) Although corporations showed considerable interest in working with minority businesses in the 1970’s, their aversion to government paperwork made them reluctant to pursue many government contracts.
(C) The significant response of corporations in the 1970’s is likely to be sustained and conceivably be increased throughout the 1980’s.
(D) Although corporations are eager to cooperate with minority-owned businesses, a shortage of capital in the 1970’s made substantial response impossible.
(E) The enormous corporate response has all but eliminated the dangers of over-expansion that used to plague small minority-owned businesses.

Please press Kudos if you found this post helpful

Joined: 16 Oct 2011
Posts: 135
Location: United States
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 5

Reviews Badge
Re: Hardest of the 700 lot RC Q [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jun 2012, 10:55

Very tough.. Kindly post the OA's
2 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Oct 2010
Posts: 271
Location: India
GMAT 1: 560 Q36 V31
GPA: 3
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 56 [2] , given: 27

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Recent years have brought minority-owned businesses in the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Jul 2012, 10:10
This post received
Here are my responses:

1. A (Quite a tricky question. Just the previous sentence uses the words "crippling fixed expenses". So if you're in a real rush, you may not read the next sentence closely to note the difference, and the subsequent answer.)
2. E (This is only one that qualifies. The others just mention similar information to trap you)
3. B (Pretty straightforward. The last line in the first para answers you upfront.)
4. C (Slightly tricky, considering the information is nestled away in the second para. 3rd sentence that deals with information about the 80's gives you the answer)


GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 7385
Followers: 697

Kudos [?]: 139 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: Recent years have brought minority-owned businesses in the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Apr 2014, 05:54
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: Recent years have brought minority-owned businesses in the   [#permalink] 11 Apr 2014, 05:54
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Recent years have brought minority-owned businesses in the saurabhgoel 2 04 Jan 2012, 16:45
Recent years have brought minority-owned businesses in the anilnandyala 1 13 Oct 2010, 20:08
Recent years have brought minority-owned businesses in the RaviChandra 3 08 Oct 2009, 13:15
Recent years have brought minority-owned businesses in the goalsnr 3 08 Jul 2008, 23:18
Recent years have brought minority-owned businesses in the vscid 8 08 Dec 2007, 12:36
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Recent years have brought minority-owned businesses in the

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.