Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 31 Aug 2016, 21:36

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Recently a court ruled that current law allows companies to

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

CEO
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 2911
Schools: Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008
Followers: 22

Kudos [?]: 237 [0], given: 0

Recently a court ruled that current law allows companies to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jul 2006, 22:05
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

15% (low)

Question Stats:

79% (02:03) correct 21% (01:42) wrong based on 174 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Recently a court ruled that current law allows companies to reject a job applicant if working in the job would entail a 90 percent chance that the applicant would suffer a heart attack. The presiding judge justified the ruling, saying that it protected both employees and employers.

This use of his court ruling as part of the law could not be effective in regulating employment practices if which of the following were true?

(A) The best interests of employers often conflict with the interests of employees.
(B) No legally accepted methods exist for calculating the risk of a job applicant's having a heart attack as a result of being employed in any particular occupation.
(C) Some jobs might involve health risks other than the risk of heart attack.
(D) Employees who have a 90 percent chance of suffering a heart attack may be unaware that their risk is so great.
(E) The number of people applying for jobs at a company might decline if the company, by screening applicants for risk of heart attack, seemed to suggest that the job entailed high risk of heart attack.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - MBA CLASS OF 2008

Last edited by WoundedTiger on 24 Oct 2014, 04:20, edited 1 time in total.
Director
Joined: 26 Sep 2005
Posts: 576
Location: Munich,Germany
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

Re: Recently a court ruled that current law allows companies to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jul 2006, 22:19
B, IMO , gives us a reason why this ruling can cause prolems. If there is no legally acceptable way determinig the risk, then there can be conflicting results. Employers might calculate a percentage which is <90%, but potenital employees might calcuate the risk as >90%, o vice-versa which will cause problems in employment practices.
VP
Joined: 25 Nov 2004
Posts: 1493
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 85 [0], given: 0

Re: Recently a court ruled that current law allows companies to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jul 2006, 22:27
(B) No legally accepted methods exist for calculating the risk of a job applicant's having a heart attack as a result of being employed in any particular occupation.
SVP
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 1737
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 0

Re: Recently a court ruled that current law allows companies to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jul 2006, 22:34
Clear winner B.

Employment practices are supposed to be fair.
IF no legally accpeted methods are present to find the chances of a person suffering a heart attack then the ruling cannot be a fair emploemtn practice.
VP
Joined: 14 May 2006
Posts: 1415
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 135 [0], given: 0

Re: Recently a court ruled that current law allows companies to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Jul 2006, 10:37
if B is true, then the argument doesn't make sense

so B should be IT
Manager
Joined: 05 Jun 2006
Posts: 113
Location: London
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Re: Recently a court ruled that current law allows companies to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Jul 2006, 03:13
B, but not sure I can rule out A that easily
Manager
Joined: 11 Jan 2006
Posts: 230
Location: Arkansas, US
WE 1: 2.5 yrs in manufacturing
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 18

Re: Recently a court ruled that current law allows companies to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Jul 2006, 03:21
Can rule out everything else...B is the winner
Manager
Joined: 15 Nov 2005
Posts: 244
Location: Italy
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 0

Re: Recently a court ruled that current law allows companies to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Jul 2006, 03:38
I do not know if this one is a gmat question type btw for me it seems that B wins
_________________

â€œIf money is your hope for independence you will never have it. The only real security that a man will have in this world is a reserve of knowledge, experience, and ability.â€

CEO
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 2911
Schools: Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008
Followers: 22

Kudos [?]: 237 [0], given: 0

Re: Recently a court ruled that current law allows companies to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Jul 2006, 07:37
Good job friends. OA is B.
_________________

SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - MBA CLASS OF 2008

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 9332
Followers: 808

Kudos [?]: 165 [0], given: 0

Re: Recently a court ruled that current law allows companies to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 May 2015, 17:32
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 9332
Followers: 808

Kudos [?]: 165 [0], given: 0

Re: Recently a court ruled that current law allows companies to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Jun 2016, 10:05
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: Recently a court ruled that current law allows companies to   [#permalink] 28 Jun 2016, 10:05
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
12 After the recent court rulings, commercial shark fishing and 13 23 Jul 2014, 17:06
Recently a court ruled that current law allows companies to 12 07 Dec 2011, 01:36
1 Under current federal law, employers are allowed to offer 8 28 May 2008, 19:52
Under current federal law, employers are allowed to offer 0 26 Jul 2007, 16:11
When a company refuses to allow other companies to produce 18 15 Oct 2006, 11:44
Display posts from previous: Sort by