Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 28 Jul 2016, 10:11
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Recently discovered fossil evidence casts doubt on the

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1793
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 77 [0], given: 0

Recently discovered fossil evidence casts doubt on the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Jan 2004, 11:01
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 100% (02:08) wrong based on 2 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

11. Recently discovered fossil evidence casts doubt on the evolutionary theory that dinosaurs are more closely related to reptiles than to other classes of animals. Fossils show that some dinosaurs had hollow bones-a feature found today only in warm-blooded creatures, such as birds, that have a high metabolic rate. Dinosaurs had well-developed senses of sight and hearing, which is not true of present-day cold-blooded creatures like reptiles. The highly arched mouth roof of some dinosaurs would have permitted them to breathe while eating, as fast-breathing animals, such as birds, need to do. Today, all fast-breathing animals are warm-blooded. Finally, fossils reveal that many dinosaurs had a pattern of growth typical of warm-blooded animals.

The argument in the passage proceeds by

(A) attempting to justify one position by demonstrating that an opposing position is based on erroneous information

(B) establishing a general principle that it then uses to draw a conclusion about a particular case

(C) dismissing a claim made about the present on the basis of historical evidence

(D) assuming that if all members of a category have a certain property then all things with that property belong to the category

(E) presenting evidence that a past phenomenon is more similar to one rather than the other of two present-day phenomena
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 28 Oct 2003
Posts: 501
Location: 55405
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Jan 2004, 12:29
That's a doozy!

(A) attempting to justify one position by demonstrating that an opposing position is based on erroneous information

Looks good at first, but I don't think so-- He doesn't cite any errors in "information" per se, but cites evidence that is inconsistent with the current classification

(B) establishing a general principle that it then uses to draw a conclusion about a particular case

He never establishes a "general principle" such as "all hollow-boned animals are not most closely related to reptiles"

(C) dismissing a claim made about the present on the basis of historical evidence

Not even close.

(D) assuming that if all members of a category have a certain property then all things with that property belong to the category

I don't know that he "assumes" anything, but this is probably correct.

(E) presenting evidence that a past phenomenon is more similar to one rather than the other of two present-day phenomena

Are the presence of hollow bones and arched mouths really "phenomena"? Sounds like a good answer otherwise...

I await the correct answer.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1793
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 77 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Jan 2004, 14:17
Correct answer is E. I chose D. However I never thought that the author talks about two phenomenon

Hi stoolfi ( I like this name - if it is your name )
Your explainations are very good indeed.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 05 Aug 2014
Posts: 10
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: Recently discovered fossil evidence casts doubt on the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Apr 2016, 05:10
i think the right answer is E. I will go with E.
Re: Recently discovered fossil evidence casts doubt on the   [#permalink] 11 Apr 2016, 05:10
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 Experts publish their posts in the topic Recently discovered fossil evidence casts doubt Vyshak 6 16 Feb 2016, 20:13
Recently discovered fossil evidence casts doubt on the gurpreet07 6 11 Feb 2009, 21:53
Recently discovered fossil evidence casts doubt on the bhatiagp 6 29 Apr 2008, 04:17
Paleontologists have discovered fossils of centipedes that vineetgupta 3 27 Mar 2007, 10:43
Recently discovered fossil evidence casts doubt on the jyotsnasarabu 11 03 Dec 2006, 09:35
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Recently discovered fossil evidence casts doubt on the

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.