Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 21 Aug 2014, 16:22

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Reducing speed limits neither saves lives nor protects the

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Aug 2005
Posts: 84
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Reducing speed limits neither saves lives nor protects the [#permalink] New post 28 Sep 2005, 00:56
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Reducing speed limits neither saves lives nor protects the environment. This is because the more slowly a car is driven, the more time it spends on the road spewing exhaust into the air and running the risk of colliding with other vehicles.

The argument’s reasoning is flawed because the argument

(A) neglects the fact that some motorists completely ignore speed limits.
(B) Ignore the possibility of benefits from lowering speed limits other than environmental and safety benefits.
(C) Fails to consider that if speed limits are reduced, increased driving times will increase the number of cars on the road at any given time.
(D) Presumes, without providing justification, that total emissions for a given automobile trip are determined primarily by the amount of time the trip takes
(E) Presumes, without providing justification, that drivers run a significant risk of collision only if they spend a lot of time on the road.
_________________

------------------------------

only if i could choose....

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Aug 2005
Posts: 102
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 28 Sep 2005, 01:38
I would go for D..... In E "only if" makes it little extreme.
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5253
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 126 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User Reviews Badge
 [#permalink] New post 28 Sep 2005, 01:51
For the exact same reasons, I too will choose D. E is worded deceptively using "only."
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Aug 2005
Posts: 84
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 28 Sep 2005, 02:44
OA is D..

u people have eyes or microscopes....i just missed that "only if" and hence chose the more general B.
_________________

------------------------------

only if i could choose....

  [#permalink] 28 Sep 2005, 02:44
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Reducing speed limits neither saves lives nor protects the vaivish1723 2 30 Jun 2009, 21:06
Reducing speed limits neither saves lives nor protects the bigtreezl 15 21 Oct 2008, 10:37
Reducing speed limits neither saves lives nor protects the IrinaOK 4 17 Oct 2007, 17:17
Reducing speed limits neither saves lives nor protects the rdg 9 02 Mar 2007, 12:04
Reducing speed limits neither saves lives nor protects the rahulraao 5 14 Nov 2005, 04:37
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Reducing speed limits neither saves lives nor protects the

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.