Reducing speed limits neither saves lives nor protects the environment. This is
because the more slowly a car is driven, the more time it spends on the road spewing exhaust into the air and running the risk of colliding with other vehicles.
The arguments reasoning is flawed because the argument
A. neglects the fact that some motorists completely ignore speed limits.
B. Ignore the possibility of benefits from lowering speed limits other than environmental and safety benefits.
C. Fails to consider that if speed limits are reduced, increased driving times will increase the number of cars on the road at any given time.
D. Presumes, without providing justification, that total emissions for a given automobile trip are determined primarily by the amount of time the trip takes
E. Presumes, without providing justification, that drivers run a significant risk of collision only if they spend a lot of time on the road.
a- off the scope
b- what other benefits can be there?
c-this will support the argument
d-here we go, this must be an answer
e-very tempting, but words only if they spend a lot of time
- raises flag, this is irrelevant as even with high speed trip may take a lot of time.