Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 23 Jul 2014, 18:02

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Reducing speed limits neither saves lives nor protects the

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 22 Aug 2007
Posts: 573
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Reducing speed limits neither saves lives nor protects the [#permalink] New post 17 Oct 2007, 17:17
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Reducing speed limits neither saves lives nor protects the environment. This is
because the more slowly a car is driven, the more time it spends on the road spewing exhaust into the air and running the risk of colliding with other vehicles.
The arguments reasoning is flawed because the argument

A. neglects the fact that some motorists completely ignore speed limits.

B. Ignore the possibility of benefits from lowering speed limits other than environmental and safety benefits.

C. Fails to consider that if speed limits are reduced, increased driving times will increase the number of cars on the road at any given time.

D. Presumes, without providing justification, that total emissions for a given automobile trip are determined primarily by the amount of time the trip takes

E. Presumes, without providing justification, that drivers run a significant risk of collision only if they spend a lot of time on the road.
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 2593
Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 179 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR_shy [#permalink] New post 17 Oct 2007, 17:41
IrinaOK wrote:
Reducing speed limits neither saves lives nor protects the environment. This is
because the more slowly a car is driven, the more time it spends on the road spewing exhaust into the air and running the risk of colliding with other vehicles.
The arguments reasoning is flawed because the argument

A. neglects the fact that some motorists completely ignore speed limits.

B. Ignore the possibility of benefits from lowering speed limits other than environmental and safety benefits.

C. Fails to consider that if speed limits are reduced, increased driving times will increase the number of cars on the road at any given time.

D. Presumes, without providing justification, that total emissions for a given automobile trip are determined primarily by the amount of time the trip takes

E. Presumes, without providing justification, that drivers run a significant risk of collision only if they spend a lot of time on the road.


Btwn D and E, I say D.

A: irrelevant
B: we are talking about enviro and safety. Irrelevant.
C: This actually strengthens the argument. Doesn't expose a potential flaw.

D and E. I like D better than E b/c E makes sense that spending more time on the road equates to increased chance of getting into an accident.

However, just b/c a car goes slow doesn't mean its emitting more pollutants, which in fact is why I chose this answer b/c when are car goes faster it uses more gas comparable to a slower rate and pollutes more.
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 03 Apr 2006
Posts: 20
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: CR_shy [#permalink] New post 18 Oct 2007, 01:20
IrinaOK wrote:
Reducing speed limits neither saves lives nor protects the environment. This is
because the more slowly a car is driven, the more time it spends on the road spewing exhaust into the air and running the risk of colliding with other vehicles.
The arguments reasoning is flawed because the argument

A. neglects the fact that some motorists completely ignore speed limits.

B. Ignore the possibility of benefits from lowering speed limits other than environmental and safety benefits.

C. Fails to consider that if speed limits are reduced, increased driving times will increase the number of cars on the road at any given time.

D. Presumes, without providing justification, that total emissions for a given automobile trip are determined primarily by the amount of time the trip takes

E. Presumes, without providing justification, that drivers run a significant risk of collision only if they spend a lot of time on the road.

a- off the scope
b- what other benefits can be there?
c-this will support the argument
d-here we go, this must be an answer
e-very tempting, but words only if they spend a lot of time - raises flag, this is irrelevant as even with high speed trip may take a lot of time.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 22 Aug 2007
Posts: 573
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR_shy [#permalink] New post 18 Oct 2007, 03:19
Utkur, "only if" is a good point.

"only if" signals extreme, and that extreme is not mentioned in the passage, in fact passage does not limit the possibility that there are other reasons for car accidents and thus the argument is not flawed in that way.

AO is D,

Thank you, guys!
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Aug 2007
Posts: 370
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR_shy [#permalink] New post 18 Oct 2007, 19:21
Its E
Re: CR_shy   [#permalink] 18 Oct 2007, 19:21
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
7 Experts publish their posts in the topic Reducing speed limits neither saves lives nor protects the SudiptoGmat 18 16 Feb 2010, 07:31
1 Reducing speed limits neither saves lives nor protects the vaivish1723 2 30 Jun 2009, 21:06
Reducing speed limits neither saves lives nor protects the rdg 9 02 Mar 2007, 12:04
Reducing speed limits neither saves lives nor protects the rahulraao 5 14 Nov 2005, 04:37
Reducing speed limits neither saves lives nor protects the crazyfin 3 28 Sep 2005, 00:56
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Reducing speed limits neither saves lives nor protects the

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.